Zhi Chen1, Singla Sethiel Mosha2, Tong Zhang1, Ming Xu3, Yanli Li2, Zhuoqing Hu2, Weiqiang Liang4, Xiaoyi Deng2, Tingting Ou2, Ling Li5, Wangen Li6. 1. Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.183 Zhongshan Avenue West, Tianhe District, 510630, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.250 Changgang Road East, Haizhu District, 510260, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.250 Changgang Road East, Haizhu District, 510260, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Nanhai Hospital of Southern Medical University, No.40 Foping Road, Nanhai District, 528200, Foshan, China. 5. Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.250 Changgang Road East, Haizhu District, 510260, Guangzhou, China. alana3344@sina.com. 6. Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.250 Changgang Road East, Haizhu District, 510260, Guangzhou, China. liwg660@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: The incidence of thyroid nodules is increasing year by year around the world. However, ultrasound is not recommended as a screening test for the general population or patients with a normal thyroid on palpation by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). In practice, some individuals with normal thyroid palpation have nodules that can just be found out by ultrasound. No studies have directly described the risk of nodules found by ultrasound or by palpation up to now. More evidence is needed to carry out for helping us balance the over diagnosis and missed diagnosis of malignant lesions. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective study to investigate the incidence of malignant lesions in ultrasound-found nodules in a large cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 2957 patients who underwent thyroid ultrasound evaluation and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) between Jan 2013 and Dec 2019. The cytologic examinations were analyzed based on the Bethesda system. For nodules suspected to be follicular neoplasm or other malignant tumors by cytological tests, patients were recommended for surgery and histopathology examinations. RESULTS: Compared with palpation-found nodules, ultrasound-found nodules were presenting less as purely cystic nodules (10.1 % vs. 39.9 %, x2 = 355.69, p = 0.000), smaller size (17.5 ± 9.9 mm vs. 28.0 ± 12.5 mm, t = 23.876 p = 0.000), and higher TI-RADS score (5.5 ± 2.9 vs. 3.4 ± 3.3, t = 18.084, p = 0.000), respectively. More ultrasound-found nodules were diagnosed as carcinoma by histology examinations [136 (11.2 %) nodules found by ultrasound vs. 68 (3.9 %) by palpation, x2 = 59.737, p = 0.000], and 88 (64.7 %) nodules found by ultrasound were non-microcarcinoma. Among the malignant nodules confirmed by histopathology, a higher proportion of microcarcinoma was detected in ultrasound-found nodules [35.3 % (48/136) vs. 16.2 % (11/68), x2 = 8.183, p = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the results observed in our research, malignant nodules were more common in nodules screened out by ultrasound, and nearly two thirds of them were non-microcarcinoma. We suggest the recommendation against screening thyroid nodules by ultrasound needs to be re-evaluated.
BACKGROUNDS: The incidence of thyroid nodules is increasing year by year around the world. However, ultrasound is not recommended as a screening test for the general population or patients with a normal thyroid on palpation by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). In practice, some individuals with normal thyroid palpation have nodules that can just be found out by ultrasound. No studies have directly described the risk of nodules found by ultrasound or by palpation up to now. More evidence is needed to carry out for helping us balance the over diagnosis and missed diagnosis of malignant lesions. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective study to investigate the incidence of malignant lesions in ultrasound-found nodules in a large cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 2957 patients who underwent thyroid ultrasound evaluation and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) between Jan 2013 and Dec 2019. The cytologic examinations were analyzed based on the Bethesda system. For nodules suspected to be follicular neoplasm or other malignant tumors by cytological tests, patients were recommended for surgery and histopathology examinations. RESULTS: Compared with palpation-found nodules, ultrasound-found nodules were presenting less as purely cystic nodules (10.1 % vs. 39.9 %, x2 = 355.69, p = 0.000), smaller size (17.5 ± 9.9 mm vs. 28.0 ± 12.5 mm, t = 23.876 p = 0.000), and higher TI-RADS score (5.5 ± 2.9 vs. 3.4 ± 3.3, t = 18.084, p = 0.000), respectively. More ultrasound-found nodules were diagnosed as carcinoma by histology examinations [136 (11.2 %) nodules found by ultrasound vs. 68 (3.9 %) by palpation, x2 = 59.737, p = 0.000], and 88 (64.7 %) nodules found by ultrasound were non-microcarcinoma. Among the malignant nodules confirmed by histopathology, a higher proportion of microcarcinoma was detected in ultrasound-found nodules [35.3 % (48/136) vs. 16.2 % (11/68), x2 = 8.183, p = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the results observed in our research, malignant nodules were more common in nodules screened out by ultrasound, and nearly two thirds of them were non-microcarcinoma. We suggest the recommendation against screening thyroid nodules by ultrasound needs to be re-evaluated.
Authors: Salvatore Vaccarella; Silvia Franceschi; Freddie Bray; Christopher P Wild; Martyn Plummer; Luigino Dal Maso Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Jin Young Kwak; Kyung Hwa Han; Jung Hyun Yoon; Hee Jung Moon; Eun Ju Son; So Hee Park; Hyun Kyung Jung; Ji Soo Choi; Bo Mi Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Samantha Tam; Moran Amit; Mongkol Boonsripitayanon; Naifa L Busaidy; Maria E Cabanillas; Steven G Waguespack; Neil D Gross; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Michelle D Williams; Stephen Y Lai; Erich M Sturgis; Mark E Zafereo Journal: Thyroid Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: M Jinih; F Faisal; K Abdalla; M Majeed; A A Achakzai; C Heffron; J McCarthy; H P Redmond Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 1.891