| Literature DB >> 33663037 |
Christine Kang1,2, Ah-Reum Cho1,2, Hyeon Jeong Lee1,2, Hyae Jin Kim1,2, Eun-Jung Kim3, Soeun Jeo1,2, Jeong-Min Hong1,2, Daehoan Moon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of microcirculation in organ function, monitoring microcirculation is not a routine practice. With developments in microscopic technology, incident dark field (IDF) microscopy (Cytocam) has allowed visualization of the microcirculation. Dorsal skinfold chamber (DSC) mouse model has been used to investigate microcirculation physiology. By employing Cytocam-IDF imaging with DSC model to assess microcirculatory alteration in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endotoxemia, we attempted to validate availability of Cytocam-IDF imaging of microcirculation.Entities:
Keywords: dorsal skinfold chamber model; glycocalyx; incident dark field; microcirculation; sepsis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33663037 PMCID: PMC7940105 DOI: 10.4266/acc.2020.00969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acute Crit Care ISSN: 2586-6052
Figure 1.Markings made prior to dorsal skinfold chamber (DSC) implantation (A). Completion of DSC implantation; note the placement of glass cover slip below the retaining ring (B).
Figure 2.Image taken after removal of the retaining ring and glass cover slip (A). Direct contact of the observational window with green light emitting microscope (B).
Weight change
| Variable | Weight (g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before DSC implantation | After DSC implantation (baseline) | Before video recording | P-value[ | |
| Control (n=8) | 26.0±2.1 | 28.0±2.1 | 26.3±2.4 | <0.001 |
| Sepsis (n=8) | 26.6±0.9 | 28.6±0.9 | 23.8±1.9 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
DSC: dorsal skinfold chamber; n: number of mice.
Weight after DSC implantation vs. weight before video recording.
Microcirculatory variables
| Parameter | Control (n=8) | Sepsis (n=8) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFI | 2.8±0.3 | 2.1±0.8 | 0.033 |
| De Backer score | 13.4±5.0 | 10.6±5.6 | 0.296 |
| Total vessel density (mm/mm2) | 14.5±5.4 | 11.7±6.2 | 0.356 |
| Proportion of perfused vessels (%) | 21.7±14.4 | 18.6±14.1 | 0.682 |
| Perfused vessel density (mm/mm2) | 2.9 (0.7–7.6) | 0.1 (0–0.2) | 1.000 |
| Heterogeneity index | 0.05 (0–0.22) | 0.30 (0.16–0.98) | 0.032 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range).
n: number of mice; MFI: microvascular flow index.
Figure 3.Electron microscopy of a cross section of dorsal skin vessel; control (A) and sepsis (B). ×20,000; white arrow, lanthanum nitrate-stained glycocalyx layer.