Amit G Singal1, Yixing Chen2, Shrihari Sridhar3, Vikas Mittal4, Hannah Fullington5, Muzeeb Shaik3, Akbar K Waljee6, Jasmin Tiro7. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital, Dallas, Texas; Department of Population Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital, Dallas, Texas; Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: amit.singal@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. 3. Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. 4. Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Population Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital, Dallas, Texas. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Michigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction (MiCHAMP), Ann Arbor, Michigan. 7. Department of Population Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital, Dallas, Texas; Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital, Dallas, Texas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There has been increased interest in interventions to promote hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance given low utilization and high proportions of late stage detection. Accurate prediction of patients likely versus unlikely to respond to interventions could allow a cost-effective approach to outreach and facilitate targeting more intensive interventions to likely non-responders. DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a mailed outreach strategy to promote HCC surveillance among 1200 cirrhosis patients at a safety-net health system between December 2014 and March 2017. We developed regularized logistic regression (RLR) and gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm models to predict surveillance completion during each of the 3 screening rounds in a training set (n = 960). Model performance was assessed using multiple performance metrics in an independent test set (n = 240). RESULTS: Among 1200 patients, surveillance was completed in 41-47% of patients over the three rounds. The RLR and GBM models demonstrated good discriminatory accuracy, with area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of 0.67 and 0.66 respectively in the first surveillance round and improved to 0.77 by the third surveillance round after incorporating prior screening behavior as a feature. Additional performance characteristics including the Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test and reliability diagrams were also evaluated. The most important variables for the predictive model were prior screening completion status and past primary care contact. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive models can help stratify patients' likelihood to respond to surveillance outreach invitations, facilitating tailored strategies to maximize effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HCC surveillance population health programs.
OBJECTIVE: There has been increased interest in interventions to promote hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance given low utilization and high proportions of late stage detection. Accurate prediction of patients likely versus unlikely to respond to interventions could allow a cost-effective approach to outreach and facilitate targeting more intensive interventions to likely non-responders. DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a mailed outreach strategy to promote HCC surveillance among 1200 cirrhosis patients at a safety-net health system between December 2014 and March 2017. We developed regularized logistic regression (RLR) and gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm models to predict surveillance completion during each of the 3 screening rounds in a training set (n = 960). Model performance was assessed using multiple performance metrics in an independent test set (n = 240). RESULTS: Among 1200 patients, surveillance was completed in 41-47% of patients over the three rounds. The RLR and GBM models demonstrated good discriminatory accuracy, with area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of 0.67 and 0.66 respectively in the first surveillance round and improved to 0.77 by the third surveillance round after incorporating prior screening behavior as a feature. Additional performance characteristics including the Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test and reliability diagrams were also evaluated. The most important variables for the predictive model were prior screening completion status and past primary care contact. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive models can help stratify patients' likelihood to respond to surveillance outreach invitations, facilitating tailored strategies to maximize effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HCC surveillance population health programs.
Authors: Ma Somsouk; Carly Rachocki; Ajitha Mannalithara; Dianne Garcia; Victoria Laleau; Barbara Grimes; Rachel B Issaka; Ellen Chen; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jorge A Marrero; Laura M Kulik; Claude B Sirlin; Andrew X Zhu; Richard S Finn; Michael M Abecassis; Lewis R Roberts; Julie K Heimbach Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mahendra S Nehra; Ying Ma; Christopher Clark; Ruben Amarasingham; Don C Rockey; Amit G Singal Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Christopher D Jensen; Douglas A Corley; Virginia P Quinn; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jeffrey K Lee; Wei K Zhao; Amy R Marks; Joanne E Schottinger; Nirupa R Ghai; Alexander T Lee; Richard Contreras; Carrie N Klabunde; Charles P Quesenberry; Theodore R Levin; Pauline A Mysliwiec Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Douglas M Post; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2015-01-01
Authors: Amit G Singal; Sarah Reddy; Himani Radadiya Aka Patel; Deyaun Villarreal; Aisha Khan; Yan Liu; Vanessa Cerda; Nicole E Rich; Caitlin C Murphy; Jasmin A Tiro; Jennifer R Kramer; Ruben Hernaez Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 13.576
Authors: Neehar D Parikh; Nabihah Tayob; Taim Al-Jarrah; Jennifer Kramer; Jennifer Melcher; Donna Smith; Patrick Marquardt; Po-Hong Liu; Runlong Tang; Fasiha Kanwal; Amit G Singal Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-07-01