Baowen Xue1, Anne McMunn1. 1. Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe how men and women divided childcare and housework demands during the height of the first Covid-19 lockdown in the UK, and whether these divisions were associated with worsening mental health during the pandemic. BACKGROUND: School closures and homeworking during the Covid-19 crisis have resulted in an immediate increase in unpaid care work, which draws new attention to gender inequality in divisions of unpaid care work. METHODS: Data come from the wave 9 (2017-19) of Understanding Society and the following April (n = 15,426) and May (n = 14,150) waves of Understanding Society Covid-19 study. Psychological distress was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) at both before and during the lockdown, and unpaid care work was measured during the lockdown. Linear regression models were used. RESULTS: Women spent much more time on unpaid care work than men during lockdown, and it was more likely to be the mother than the father who reduced working hours or changed employment schedules due to increased time on childcare. Women who spent long hours on housework and childcare were more likely to report increased levels of psychological distress. Working parents who adapted their work patterns increased more psychological distress than those who did not. This association was much stronger if he or she was the only member in the household who adapted their work patterns, or if she was a lone mother. Fathers increased more psychological distress if they reduced work hours but she did not, compared to neither reducing work hours. CONCLUSION: There are continued gender inequalities in divisions of unpaid care work. Juggling home working with homeschooling and childcare as well as extra housework is likely to lead to poor mental health for people with families, particularly for lone mothers.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how men and women divided childcare and housework demands during the height of the first Covid-19 lockdown in the UK, and whether these divisions were associated with worsening mental health during the pandemic. BACKGROUND: School closures and homeworking during the Covid-19 crisis have resulted in an immediate increase in unpaid care work, which draws new attention to gender inequality in divisions of unpaid care work. METHODS: Data come from the wave 9 (2017-19) of Understanding Society and the following April (n = 15,426) and May (n = 14,150) waves of Understanding Society Covid-19 study. Psychological distress was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) at both before and during the lockdown, and unpaid care work was measured during the lockdown. Linear regression models were used. RESULTS:Women spent much more time on unpaid care work than men during lockdown, and it was more likely to be the mother than the father who reduced working hours or changed employment schedules due to increased time on childcare. Women who spent long hours on housework and childcare were more likely to report increased levels of psychological distress. Working parents who adapted their work patterns increased more psychological distress than those who did not. This association was much stronger if he or she was the only member in the household who adapted their work patterns, or if she was a lone mother. Fathers increased more psychological distress if they reduced work hours but she did not, compared to neither reducing work hours. CONCLUSION: There are continued gender inequalities in divisions of unpaid care work. Juggling home working with homeschooling and childcare as well as extra housework is likely to lead to poor mental health for people with families, particularly for lone mothers.
Authors: Mattia Caldarulo; Jared Olsen; Ashlee Frandell; Shaika Islam; Timothy P Johnson; Mary K Feeney; Lesley Michalegko; Eric W Welch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Georgia Salanti; Natalie Peter; Thomy Tonia; Alexander Holloway; Ian R White; Leila Darwish; Nicola Low; Matthias Egger; Andreas D Haas; Seena Fazel; Ronald C Kessler; Helen Herrman; Christian Kieling; Dominique J F De Quervain; Simone N Vigod; Vikram Patel; Tianjing Li; Pim Cuijpers; Andrea Cipriani; Toshi A Furukawa; Stefan Leucht Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 51.598
Authors: Hosam Alzahrani; Fahad Alshehri; Muhsen Alsufiany; Hatem H Allam; Rania Almeheyawi; Marwa M Eid; Kabir P Sadarangani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bria Scriven Mele; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Patricia Harasym; Sandra M Dumanski; Kirsten Fiest; Ian D Graham; Kara Nerenberg; Colleen Norris; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Louise Pilote; Harlan Pruden; Valeria Raparelli; Doreen Rabi; Shannon M Ruzycki; Ranjani Somayaji; Henry Thomas Stelfox; Sofia B Ahmed Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Andreia Teixeira; Ronaldo Gabriel; José Martinho; Graça Pinto; Luís Quaresma; Aurélio Faria; Irene Oliveira; Helena Moreira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390