Felipe J Colón-González1,2,3,4, Leonardo Soares Bastos1,3,5, Barbara Hofmann6, Alison Hopkin6, Quillon Harpham6, Tom Crocker7, Rosanna Amato7, Iacopo Ferrario6, Francesca Moschini6, Samuel James6, Sajni Malde6, Eleanor Ainscoe6, Vu Sinh Nam8, Dang Quang Tan9, Nguyen Duc Khoa9, Mark Harrison7, Gina Tsarouchi6, Darren Lumbroso6, Oliver J Brady1,2, Rachel Lowe1,2,3. 1. Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 3. Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 4. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom. 5. Scientific Computing Programme, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro. 6. HR Wallingford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. 7. Met Office, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom. 8. National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam. 9. General Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With enough advanced notice, dengue outbreaks can be mitigated. As a climate-sensitive disease, environmental conditions and past patterns of dengue can be used to make predictions about future outbreak risk. These predictions improve public health planning and decision-making to ultimately reduce the burden of disease. Past approaches to dengue forecasting have used seasonal climate forecasts, but the predictive ability of a system using different lead times in a year-round prediction system has been seldom explored. Moreover, the transition from theoretical to operational systems integrated with disease control activities is rare. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We introduce an operational seasonal dengue forecasting system for Vietnam where Earth observations, seasonal climate forecasts, and lagged dengue cases are used to drive a superensemble of probabilistic dengue models to predict dengue risk up to 6 months ahead. Bayesian spatiotemporal models were fit to 19 years (2002-2020) of dengue data at the province level across Vietnam. A superensemble of these models then makes probabilistic predictions of dengue incidence at various future time points aligned with key Vietnamese decision and planning deadlines. We demonstrate that the superensemble generates more accurate predictions of dengue incidence than the individual models it incorporates across a suite of time horizons and transmission settings. Using historical data, the superensemble made slightly more accurate predictions (continuous rank probability score [CRPS] = 66.8, 95% CI 60.6-148.0) than a baseline model which forecasts the same incidence rate every month (CRPS = 79.4, 95% CI 78.5-80.5) at lead times of 1 to 3 months, albeit with larger uncertainty. The outbreak detection capability of the superensemble was considerably larger (69%) than that of the baseline model (54.5%). Predictions were most accurate in southern Vietnam, an area that experiences semi-regular seasonal dengue transmission. The system also demonstrated added value across multiple areas compared to previous practice of not using a forecast. We use the system to make a prospective prediction for dengue incidence in Vietnam for the period May to October 2020. Prospective predictions made with the superensemble were slightly more accurate (CRPS = 110, 95% CI 102-575) than those made with the baseline model (CRPS = 125, 95% CI 120-168) but had larger uncertainty. Finally, we propose a framework for the evaluation of probabilistic predictions. Despite the demonstrated value of our forecasting system, the approach is limited by the consistency of the dengue case data, as well as the lack of publicly available, continuous, and long-term data sets on mosquito control efforts and serotype-specific case data. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that by combining detailed Earth observation data, seasonal climate forecasts, and state-of-the-art models, dengue outbreaks can be predicted across a broad range of settings, with enough lead time to meaningfully inform dengue control. While our system omits some important variables not currently available at a subnational scale, the majority of past outbreaks could be predicted up to 3 months ahead. Over the next 2 years, the system will be prospectively evaluated and, if successful, potentially extended to other areas and other climate-sensitive disease systems.
BACKGROUND: With enough advanced notice, dengue outbreaks can be mitigated. As a climate-sensitive disease, environmental conditions and past patterns of dengue can be used to make predictions about future outbreak risk. These predictions improve public health planning and decision-making to ultimately reduce the burden of disease. Past approaches to dengue forecasting have used seasonal climate forecasts, but the predictive ability of a system using different lead times in a year-round prediction system has been seldom explored. Moreover, the transition from theoretical to operational systems integrated with disease control activities is rare. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We introduce an operational seasonal dengue forecasting system for Vietnam where Earth observations, seasonal climate forecasts, and lagged dengue cases are used to drive a superensemble of probabilistic dengue models to predict dengue risk up to 6 months ahead. Bayesian spatiotemporal models were fit to 19 years (2002-2020) of dengue data at the province level across Vietnam. A superensemble of these models then makes probabilistic predictions of dengue incidence at various future time points aligned with key Vietnamese decision and planning deadlines. We demonstrate that the superensemble generates more accurate predictions of dengue incidence than the individual models it incorporates across a suite of time horizons and transmission settings. Using historical data, the superensemble made slightly more accurate predictions (continuous rank probability score [CRPS] = 66.8, 95% CI 60.6-148.0) than a baseline model which forecasts the same incidence rate every month (CRPS = 79.4, 95% CI 78.5-80.5) at lead times of 1 to 3 months, albeit with larger uncertainty. The outbreak detection capability of the superensemble was considerably larger (69%) than that of the baseline model (54.5%). Predictions were most accurate in southern Vietnam, an area that experiences semi-regular seasonal dengue transmission. The system also demonstrated added value across multiple areas compared to previous practice of not using a forecast. We use the system to make a prospective prediction for dengue incidence in Vietnam for the period May to October 2020. Prospective predictions made with the superensemble were slightly more accurate (CRPS = 110, 95% CI 102-575) than those made with the baseline model (CRPS = 125, 95% CI 120-168) but had larger uncertainty. Finally, we propose a framework for the evaluation of probabilistic predictions. Despite the demonstrated value of our forecasting system, the approach is limited by the consistency of the dengue case data, as well as the lack of publicly available, continuous, and long-term data sets on mosquito control efforts and serotype-specific case data. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that by combining detailed Earth observation data, seasonal climate forecasts, and state-of-the-art models, dengue outbreaks can be predicted across a broad range of settings, with enough lead time to meaningfully inform dengue control. While our system omits some important variables not currently available at a subnational scale, the majority of past outbreaks could be predicted up to 3 months ahead. Over the next 2 years, the system will be prospectively evaluated and, if successful, potentially extended to other areas and other climate-sensitive disease systems.
Authors: Donald S Shepard; Eduardo A Undurraga; Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto; María G Guzmán; Scott B Halstead; Eva Harris; Rose Nani Mudin; Kristy O Murray; Roberto Tapia-Conyer; Duane J Gubler Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2014-11-20
Authors: Samir Bhatt; Peter W Gething; Oliver J Brady; Jane P Messina; Andrew W Farlow; Catherine L Moyes; John M Drake; John S Brownstein; Anne G Hoen; Osman Sankoh; Monica F Myers; Dylan B George; Thomas Jaenisch; G R William Wint; Cameron P Simmons; Thomas W Scott; Jeremy J Farrar; Simon I Hay Journal: Nature Date: 2013-04-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Evan L Ray; Logan C Brooks; Jacob Bien; Matthew Biggerstaff; Nikos I Bosse; Johannes Bracher; Estee Y Cramer; Sebastian Funk; Aaron Gerding; Michael A Johansson; Aaron Rumack; Yijin Wang; Martha Zorn; Ryan J Tibshirani; Nicholas G Reich Journal: Int J Forecast Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Van-Hau Nguyen; Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh; James Mulhall; Hoang Van Minh; Trung Q Duong; Nguyen Van Chien; Nguyen Thi Trang Nhung; Vu Hoang Lan; Hoang Ba Minh; Do Cuong; Nguyen Ngoc Bich; Nguyen Huu Quyen; Tran Nu Quy Linh; Nguyen Thi Tho; Ngu Duy Nghia; Le Van Quoc Anh; Diep T M Phan; Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung; Mai Thai Son Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Sarbhan Singh; Lai Chee Herng; Lokman Hakim Sulaiman; Shew Fung Wong; Jenarun Jelip; Norhayati Mokhtar; Quillon Harpham; Gina Tsarouchi; Balvinder Singh Gill Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Simon Pollett; Michael A Johansson; Nicholas G Reich; David Brett-Major; Sara Y Del Valle; Srinivasan Venkatramanan; Rachel Lowe; Travis Porco; Irina Maljkovic Berry; Alina Deshpande; Moritz U G Kraemer; David L Blazes; Wirichada Pan-Ngum; Alessandro Vespigiani; Suzanne E Mate; Sheetal P Silal; Sasikiran Kandula; Rachel Sippy; Talia M Quandelacy; Jeffrey J Morgan; Jacob Ball; Lindsay C Morton; Benjamin M Althouse; Julie Pavlin; Wilbert van Panhuis; Steven Riley; Matthew Biggerstaff; Cecile Viboud; Oliver Brady; Caitlin Rivers Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Vicente Navarro Valencia; Yamilka Díaz; Juan Miguel Pascale; Maciej F Boni; Javier E Sanchez-Galan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Damien K Ming; Nguyen M Tuan; Bernard Hernandez; Sorawat Sangkaew; Nguyen L Vuong; Ho Q Chanh; Nguyen V V Chau; Cameron P Simmons; Bridget Wills; Pantelis Georgiou; Alison H Holmes; Sophie Yacoub Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-03-14