Literature DB >> 33661668

The role of movement kinematics in facial emotion expression production and recognition.

Sophie Sowden1, Bianca A Schuster1, Connor T Keating1, Dagmar S Fraser1, Jennifer L Cook1.   

Abstract

The kinematics of peoples' body movements provide useful cues about emotional states: for example, angry movements are typically fast and sad movements slow. Unlike the body movement literature, studies of facial expressions have focused on spatial, rather than kinematic, cues. This series of experiments demonstrates that speed comprises an important facial emotion expression cue. In Experiments 1a-1c we developed (N = 47) and validated (N = 27) an emotion-induction procedure, and recorded (N = 42) posed and spontaneous facial expressions of happy, angry, and sad emotional states. Our novel analysis pipeline quantified the speed of changes in distance between key facial landmarks. We observed that happy expressions were fastest, sad were slowest, and angry expressions were intermediate. In Experiment 2 (N = 67) we replicated our results for posed expressions and introduced a novel paradigm to index communicative emotional expressions. Across Experiments 1 and 2, we demonstrate differences between posed, spontaneous, and communicative expression contexts. Whereas mouth and eyebrow movements reliably distinguished emotions for posed and communicative expressions, only eyebrow movements were reliable for spontaneous expressions. In Experiments 3 and 4 we manipulated facial expression speed and demonstrated a quantifiable change in emotion recognition accuracy. That is, in a discovery (N = 29) and replication sample (N = 41), we showed that speeding up facial expressions promotes anger and happiness judgments, and slowing down expressions encourages sad judgments. This influence of kinematics on emotion recognition is dissociable from the influence of spatial cues. These studies demonstrate that the kinematics of facial movements provide added value, and an independent contribution to emotion recognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33661668     DOI: 10.1037/emo0000835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  6 in total

1.  Subnormal short-latency facial mimicry responses to dynamic emotional facial expressions in male adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits.

Authors:  Anton van Boxtel; Ruud Zaalberg; Minet de Wied
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.348

2.  Dopaminergic Modulation of Dynamic Emotion Perception.

Authors:  B A Schuster; S Sowden; A J Rybicki; D S Fraser; C Press; P Holland; J L Cook
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Caricatured facial movements enhance perception of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Forida Begum; Francesca Pizzorni Ferrarese; Sarah Jans; Caroline Woolley; Justin Sulik
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  The spatio-temporal features of perceived-as-genuine and deliberate expressions.

Authors:  Shushi Namba; Koyo Nakamura; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  An exploration of the impact of contextual information on the emotion recognition ability of autistic adults.

Authors:  Dale Metcalfe; Karen McKenzie; Kristofor McCarty; Thomas V Pollet; George Murray
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2022-02-14

6.  Differences Between Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults in the Recognition of Anger from Facial Motion Remain after Controlling for Alexithymia.

Authors:  Connor T Keating; Dagmar S Fraser; Sophie Sowden; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-05-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.