Frederick Huynh1,2,3, Charles Jimenez Cruz1,2,4,5, Ho Kyoung Hwang1,2, Woo Jung Lee1,2, Chang Moo Kang6,7. 1. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Ludlow Faculty Research Building #201, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea. 2. Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 3. HepatoPancreatoBiliary (HPB) Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. Liver and Pancreas Center, Department of Surgery, The Medical City Clark, Mabalacat, Philippines. 5. Centro Medico De Santisimo Rosario Hospital, Balanga City, Philippines. 6. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Ludlow Faculty Research Building #201, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea. cmkang@yuhs.ac. 7. Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. cmkang@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There continues to be an interest in minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic surgery. At our institution, there has been a progressive change from an open to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (laparoscopic, robotic, or laparoscopic-robotic) approach for central pancreatectomies (CP). The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes with open CP (O-CP) versus minimally invasive CP (MI-CP). METHODS: A retrospective medical review of patients who underwent CP between 1993 and 2018 at Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea was performed. Short-term perioperative outcomes were compared between O-CP and MI-CP. RESULTS: Thirty-one CPs (11 open, 20 MIS) were identified during the study period. No difference was observed in admission days between O-CP and MI-CP (21.2 vs. 16.7 days, p = 0.340), although operating time was significantly increased in the MI-CP group (296.8 vs. 374.8 min, p = 0.036). Blood loss was significantly less in MI-CP vs. O-CP (807.1 vs. 214.0 mls, p = 0.001), with no difference in post-operative new-onset diabetes (9% vs. 5%). The overall post-operative pancreatic fistula rate was 25.8%, and no significant difference between O-CP and MI-CP or complication rates (45% vs. 40%) was observed. CONCLUSION: Despite increased operative time, MI-CP is feasible and comparable to conventional O-CP with regard to surgical outcomes in well-selected patients.
BACKGROUND: There continues to be an interest in minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic surgery. At our institution, there has been a progressive change from an open to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (laparoscopic, robotic, or laparoscopic-robotic) approach for central pancreatectomies (CP). The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes with open CP (O-CP) versus minimally invasive CP (MI-CP). METHODS: A retrospective medical review of patients who underwent CP between 1993 and 2018 at Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea was performed. Short-term perioperative outcomes were compared between O-CP and MI-CP. RESULTS: Thirty-one CPs (11 open, 20 MIS) were identified during the study period. No difference was observed in admission days between O-CP and MI-CP (21.2 vs. 16.7 days, p = 0.340), although operating time was significantly increased in the MI-CP group (296.8 vs. 374.8 min, p = 0.036). Blood loss was significantly less in MI-CP vs. O-CP (807.1 vs. 214.0 mls, p = 0.001), with no difference in post-operative new-onset diabetes (9% vs. 5%). The overall post-operative pancreatic fistula rate was 25.8%, and no significant difference between O-CP and MI-CP or complication rates (45% vs. 40%) was observed. CONCLUSION: Despite increased operative time, MI-CP is feasible and comparable to conventional O-CP with regard to surgical outcomes in well-selected patients.
Authors: Jong Min Lee; Yoon Dae Han; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 4.584