Literature DB >> 33661004

Comparison of Chemical Structure and Cell Morphology Information for Multitask Bioactivity Predictions.

Maria-Anna Trapotsi1, Lewis H Mervin2, Avid M Afzal3, Noé Sturm4, Ola Engkvist4, Ian P Barrett3, Andreas Bender1.   

Abstract

The understanding of the mechanism-of-action (MoA) of compounds and the prediction of potential drug targets play an important role in small-molecule drug discovery. The aim of this work was to compare chemical and cell morphology information for bioactivity prediction. The comparison was performed using bioactivity data from the ExCAPE database, image data (in the form of CellProfiler features) from the Cell Painting data set (the largest publicly available data set of cell images with ∼30,000 compound perturbations), and extended connectivity fingerprints (ECFPs) using the multitask Bayesian matrix factorization (BMF) approach Macau. We found that the BMF Macau and random forest (RF) performance were overall similar when ECFPs were used as compound descriptors. However, BMF Macau outperformed RF in 159 out of 224 targets (71%) when image data were used as compound information. Using BMF Macau, 100 (corresponding to about 45%) and 90 (about 40%) of the 224 targets were predicted with high predictive performance (AUC > 0.8) with ECFP data and image data as side information, respectively. There were targets better predicted by image data as side information, such as β-catenin, and others better predicted by fingerprint-based side information, such as proteins belonging to the G-protein-Coupled Receptor 1 family, which could be rationalized from the underlying data distributions in each descriptor domain. In conclusion, both cell morphology changes and chemical structure information contain information about compound bioactivity, which is also partially complementary, and can hence contribute to in silico MoA analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33661004     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  4 in total

1.  Cell Morphological Profiling Enables High-Throughput Screening for PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Phenotypic Signature.

Authors:  Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Elizabeth Mouchet; Guy Williams; Tiziana Monteverde; Karolina Juhani; Riku Turkki; Filip Miljković; Anton Martinsson; Lewis Mervin; Kenneth R Pryde; Erik Müllers; Ian Barrett; Ola Engkvist; Andreas Bender; Kevin Moreau
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Analysis of the benefits of imputation models over traditional QSAR models for toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Moritz Walter; Luke N Allen; Antonio de la Vega de León; Samuel J Webb; Valerie J Gillet
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 8.489

Review 3.  Computational analyses of mechanism of action (MoA): data, methods and integration.

Authors:  Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Layla Hosseini-Gerami; Andreas Bender
Journal:  RSC Chem Biol       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Integrating cell morphology with gene expression and chemical structure to aid mitochondrial toxicity detection.

Authors:  Srijit Seal; Jordi Carreras-Puigvert; Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Hongbin Yang; Ola Spjuth; Andreas Bender
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-08-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.