Gautier Breville1, Amelie Bailly2, Loraine Fisch1,3, Zsolt Kulcsar4, Deborah Pugin2, Emmanuel Carrera1. 1. Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Intensive Care Unit, Department of APSI, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Neurovascular Unit, Department of Neurology, Groupement Hospitalier de l'Ouest Lémanique, Nyon, Switzerland. 4. Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Diagnostic Department, Zurich University Hospitals, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
Background: A fatal outcome occurs in 2% of patients with Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS). Due to its rarity, guidelines for the management of the most severe forms of RCVS are lacking. Case presentation: Here, we describe the case of a 55 year-old woman who died from complications of RCVS and reviewed patients with fatal outcome reported in the literature. In our patient, the first episode of neurological deterioration was preceded by an increase of cerebral blood flow velocities assessed with transcranial Doppler. A fatal evolution could not be prevented despite therapeutic escalation consisting of multiple non-invasive and invasive treatments including cervical sympathetic bloc and continuous arterial infusion of nimodipine at the site of severe vasoconstriction. Conclusion: This case and the review of literature illustrate the challenges in the management of patients with severe RCVS. We describe here how monitoring of cerebral blood flow might help anticipate clinical worsening at the beginning of the disease and propose novel invasive and non-invasive therapeutic strategies based on monitoring of neurophysiological parameters.
Background: A fatal outcome occurs in 2% of patients with Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS). Due to its rarity, guidelines for the management of the most severe forms of RCVS are lacking. Case presentation: Here, we describe the case of a 55 year-old woman who died from complications of RCVS and reviewed patients with fatal outcome reported in the literature. In our patient, the first episode of neurological deterioration was preceded by an increase of cerebral blood flow velocities assessed with transcranial Doppler. A fatal evolution could not be prevented despite therapeutic escalation consisting of multiple non-invasive and invasive treatments including cervical sympathetic bloc and continuous arterial infusion of nimodipine at the site of severe vasoconstriction. Conclusion: This case and the review of literature illustrate the challenges in the management of patients with severe RCVS. We describe here how monitoring of cerebral blood flow might help anticipate clinical worsening at the beginning of the disease and propose novel invasive and non-invasive therapeutic strategies based on monitoring of neurophysiological parameters.