Literature DB >> 33658559

Bayesian Optimization of Bose-Einstein Condensates.

Tamil Arasan Bakthavatchalam1, Suriyadeepan Ramamoorthy2, Malaikannan Sankarasubbu2, Radha Ramaswamy3, Vijayalakshmi Sethuraman4.   

Abstract

Machine Learning methods are emerging as faster and efficient alternatives to numerical simulation techniques. The field of Scientific Computing has started adopting these data-driven approaches to faithfully model physical phenomena using scattered, noisy observations from coarse-grained grid-based simulations. In this paper, we investigate data-driven modelling of Bose-Einstein Condensates (BECs). In particular, we use Gaussian Processes (GPs) to model the ground state wave function of BECs as a function of scattering parameters from the dimensionless Gross Pitaveskii Equation (GPE). Experimental results illustrate the ability of GPs to accurately reproduce ground state wave functions using a limited number of data points from simulations. Consistent performance across different configurations of BECs, namely Scalar and Vectorial BECs generated under different potentials, including harmonic, double well and optical lattice potentials pronounces the versatility of our method. Comparison with existing data-driven models indicates that our model achieves similar accuracy with only a small fraction ([Formula: see text]th) of data points used by existing methods, in addition to modelling uncertainty from data. When used as a simulator post-training, our model generates ground state wave functions [Formula: see text] faster than Trotter Suzuki, a numerical approximation technique that uses Imaginary time evolution. Our method is quite general; with minor changes it can be applied to similar quantum many-body problems.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33658559      PMCID: PMC7930139          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84336-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication.

Authors:  Herbert Jaeger; Harald Haas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  In Silico Labeling: Predicting Fluorescent Labels in Unlabeled Images.

Authors:  Eric M Christiansen; Samuel J Yang; D Michael Ando; Ashkan Javaherian; Gaia Skibinski; Scott Lipnick; Elliot Mount; Alison O'Neil; Kevan Shah; Alicia K Lee; Piyush Goyal; William Fedus; Ryan Poplin; Andre Esteva; Marc Berndl; Lee L Rubin; Philip Nelson; Steven Finkbeiner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Superhuman AI for multiplayer poker.

Authors:  Noam Brown; Tuomas Sandholm
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carleo; Matthias Troyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Xun Gao; Lu-Ming Duan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Constructing exact representations of quantum many-body systems with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carleo; Yusuke Nomura; Masatoshi Imada
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Generation of Bose-Einstein Condensates' Ground State Through Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xiao Liang; Huan Zhang; Sheng Liu; Yan Li; Yong-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.