Literature DB >> 33658274

Evaluating the Antimicrobial Properties of Commercial Hand Sanitizers.

M Chojnacki1, C Dobrotka1, R Osborn1, W Johnson2, M Young1, B Meyer1, E Laskey1, R A F Wozniak2, S Dewhurst1, P M Dunman3.   

Abstract

Hand sanitizers have been developed as a convenient means to decontaminate an individual's hands of bacterial pathogens in situations in which soap and water are not available. Yet to our knowledge, no study has compared the antibacterial efficacy of a large collection of hand sanitizers. Using zone of growth inhibition and kill curve assays, we assessed the performance of 46 commercially available hand sanitizers that were obtained from national chain big-box stores, gasoline stations, pharmacies, and boutiques for antibacterial activity toward prototypical Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacterial pathogens. Results revealed substantial variability in the efficacy of many sanitizers evaluated. Formulations following World Health Organization-recommended ingredients (80% ethanol or 75% isopropyl alcohol) or those including benzalkonium chloride as the active principal ingredient displayed excellent antibacterial activity, whereas others exhibited modest or poor activity in the assays performed. Results also revealed that E. coli was generally more susceptible to most sanitizers in comparison to S. aureus and that there was significant strain-to-strain variability in hand sanitizer antimicrobial efficacy regardless of the organism evaluated. Further, tests of a subset of hand sanitizers toward severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) revealed no direct correlation between antibacterial and antiviral performance, with all ethyl alcohol formulations performing equally well and displaying improved activity in comparison to benzalkonium chloride-containing sanitizer. Taken together, these results indicate that there is likely to be substantial variability in the antimicrobial performance of commercially available hand sanitizers, particularly toward bacterial pathogens, and a need to evaluate the efficacy of sanitizers under development.IMPORTANCE In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hand hygiene has taken on a prominent role in efforts to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission and infection, which has led to a radical increase in the number and types of hand sanitizers manufactured to meet public demand. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated or compared the antimicrobial performance of hand sanitizers that are being produced under COVID-19 emergency authorization. Tests of 46 commercially available hand sanitizers purchased from national chain brick-and-mortar stores revealed considerable variability in their antibacterial performance toward two bacterial pathogens of immediate health care concern, S. aureus and E. coli Expanded testing of a subset of hand sanitizers revealed no direct correlation between antibacterial performance of individual sanitizers and their activity toward SARS-CoV-2. These results indicate that as the pandemic subsides, there will be a need to validate the antimicrobial efficacy of sanitizers being produced.
Copyright © 2021 Chojnacki et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; SARS-CoV-2; Staphylococcus aureus; hand sanitizer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33658274     DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00062-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mSphere        ISSN: 2379-5042            Impact factor:   4.389


  6 in total

1.  Rhamnolipid Nano-Micelles versus Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer: A Comparative Study for Antibacterial Activity against Hospital-Acquired Infections and Toxicity Concerns.

Authors:  Yasmin Abo-Zeid; Marwa Reda Bakkar; Gehad E Elkhouly; Nermeen R Raya; Dalia Zaafar
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  A preliminary evaluation of chemical interaction between sanitizing products and silk.

Authors:  Benedetta Favaro; Eleonora Balliana; Federica Rigoni; Elisabetta Zendri
Journal:  J Cult Herit       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.229

3.  Assessment of disinfectant efficacy in reducing microbial growth.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alajlan; Lenah E Mukhtar; Adnan S Almussallam; Abdullah M Alnuqaydan; Nasser S Albakiri; Turki F Almutari; Khalid M Bin Shehail; Fahad S Aldawsari; Sulaiman M Alajel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers: Does Gelling Agent Really Matter?

Authors:  Ivana d'Angelo; Romina Provenzano; Ettore Florio; Chiara Pagliuca; Giuseppe Mantova; Elena Scaglione; Mariateresa Vitiello; Roberta Colicchio; Paola Salvatore; Francesca Ungaro; Fabiana Quaglia; Agnese Miro
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Rapid-killing efficacy substantiates the antiseptic property of the synergistic combination of carvacrol and nerol against nosocomial pathogens.

Authors:  Thirupathi Kasthuri; Thirukannamangai Krishnan Swetha; James Prabhanand Bhaskar; Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.667

6.  Evaluation of quality and antimicrobial efficacy of locally manufactured alcohol-based hand sanitizers marketed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Muluken Nigatu Selam; Bruck Messele Habte; Tesfa Marew; Molalegne Bitew; Tigist Getachew; Solomon Getachew; Atlaw Abate; Mequanint Mitiku; Motlalepula Matsabisa; Gebremariam Birhanu
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 6.454

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.