Literature DB >> 33657995

Public perceptions, individual characteristics, and preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in six countries: a cross-sectional study.

Ryosuke Fujii1, Kensuke Suzuki2, Junichiro Niimi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public perceptions and personal characteristics are heterogeneous between countries and subgroups, which may have different impacts on health-protective behaviors during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To assess whether self-reported perceptions of COVID-19 and personal characteristics are associated with protective behaviors among general adults and to compare patterns in six different countries.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study uses the secondary data collected through an online survey between 15 and 23 April 2020 across six countries (China, Italy, Japan, Korea, the UK, and the USA). A total of 5945 adults aged 18 years or older were eligible for our analysis. A logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of three recommended behaviors (wearing a mask, handwashing, and avoiding social gatherings).
RESULTS: In most countries except for China, the participants who perceived wearing a mask as being extremely effective to curtail the pandemic were more likely to wear a mask (OR, 95%CI: Italy: 4.14, 2.08-8.02; Japan: 3.59, 1.75-7.30; Korea: 7.89, 1.91-31.63: UK: 9.23, 5.14-17.31; USA: 4.81, 2.61-8.92). Those who perceived that handwashing was extremely effective had higher ORs of this preventive behavior (OR, 95%CI: Italy: 16.39, 3.56-70.18; Japan: 12.24, 4.03-37.35; Korea: 12.41, 2.02-76.39; UK: 18.04, 2.60-152.78; USA: 10.56, 2.21-44.32). The participants who perceived avoiding social gathering as being extremely effective to curtail the pandemic were more likely to take this type of preventive behavior (OR, 95%CI: China: 3.79, 1.28-10.23; Korea: 6.18, 1.77-20.60; UK: 4.45, 1.63-11.63; USA: 4.34, 1.84-9.95). The associations between personal characteristics, living environment, psychological status, and preventive behaviors varied across different countries. Individuals who changed their behavior because of recommendations from doctors/public health officials were more likely to take preventive behaviors in many countries.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that higher perceived effectiveness may be a common factor to encourage preventive behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These results may provide a better understanding of the homogeneity and heterogeneity of factors related to preventive behaviors and improve public health policies in various countries and groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avoiding social gatherings; COVID-19; Handwashing; Preventive behavior; Public perception; Wearing a mask

Year:  2021        PMID: 33657995      PMCID: PMC7928175          DOI: 10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med        ISSN: 1342-078X            Impact factor:   3.674


  23 in total

1.  An outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome: predictors of health behaviors and effect of community prevention measures in Hong Kong, China.

Authors:  Catherine S K Tang; Chi-yan Wong
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Stigmatization of newly emerging infectious diseases: AIDS and SARS.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Sandro Galea; Melissa Tracy; Susan Tross; David Vlahov
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A tale of two cities: community psychobehavioral surveillance and related impact on outbreak control in Hong Kong and Singapore during the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic.

Authors:  Gabriel M Leung; Stella Quah; Lai-Ming Ho; Sai-Yin Ho; Anthony J Hedley; Hin-Peng Lee; Tai-Hing Lam
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Income and health behaviours. Evidence from monitoring surveys among Finnish adults.

Authors:  M Laaksonen; R Prättälä; V Helasoja; A Uutela; E Lahelma
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62.

Authors:  J T F Lau; X Yang; H Tsui; J H Kim
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  The challenges of modeling and forecasting the spread of COVID-19.

Authors:  Andrea L Bertozzi; Elisa Franco; George Mohler; Martin B Short; Daniel Sledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.

Authors:  Nicholas G Davies; Adam J Kucharski; Rosalind M Eggo; Amy Gimma; W John Edmunds
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2020-06-02

8.  Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Michael S Wolf; Marina Serper; Lauren Opsasnick; Rachel M O'Conor; Laura Curtis; Julia Yoshino Benavente; Guisselle Wismer; Stephanie Batio; Morgan Eifler; Pauline Zheng; Andrea Russell; Marina Arvanitis; Daniela Ladner; Mary Kwasny; Stephen D Persell; Theresa Rowe; Jeffrey A Linder; Stacy C Bailey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy.

Authors:  Giulia Giordano; Franco Blanchini; Raffaele Bruno; Patrizio Colaneri; Alessandro Di Filippo; Angela Di Matteo; Marta Colaneri
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 87.241

10.  Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Chen Shen; Nan Xia; Wei Song; Mengzhen Fan; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Types of Perception Toward Quarantine Measures among Patients Infected with COVID-19].

Authors:  Geun Myun Kim; Jung Un Lee; Hae Kyung Jung; Soo Gyung Nam; So Hyeong Sim; Soo Jung Chang
Journal:  J Korean Acad Nurs       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.984

2.  An internet-based cross-sectional study on infection control practices and drug use for COVID-19 prevention in Nigerian adults.

Authors:  Adedoyin Oyeyimika Ogunyemi; Adedunni Wumi Olusanya; Adesina Paul Arikawe; Oluwarotimi Bolaji Olopade; Uyiekpen Ima-Edomwonyi; Roland Oluwapelumi Ojo
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  A longitudinal study of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in a random sample of the general population in Hiroshima in 2020.

Authors:  Aya Sugiyama; Fumie Okada; Kanon Abe; Hirohito Imada; Serge Ouoba; Bunthen E; Md Razeen Ashraf Hussain; Masayuki Ohisa; Ko Ko; Shintaro Nagashima; Tomoyuki Akita; Shinichi Yamazaki; Michiya Yokozaki; Eisaku Kishita; Junko Tanaka
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.395

4.  Development of a rating scale for measuring resistance to persuasive health messages.

Authors:  Machi Suka; Takashi Shimazaki; Takashi Yamauchi; Hiroyuki Yanagisawa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.395

5.  Infection preventive behaviors and its association with perceived threat and perceived social factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea: 2020 community health survey.

Authors:  Woo In Hyun; Yoon Hee Son; Sun Ok Jung
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Assessing Knowledge, Preventive Practices, and Depression Among Chinese International Students and Local Korean Students in South Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Xiaoxu Jiang; Bo Zhao; Eun Woo Nam; Fanlei Kong
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.