| Literature DB >> 33657984 |
Dhia Joseph Chackalackal1, Ahmed Asa'Ad Al-Aghbari1, Su Yeon Jang2, Tatiana Rivera Ramirez1, Jose Vincent3, Anand Joshi4, Megha Raj Banjara5, Peter Asaga6, Rocio Cardenas Sanchez7,8, Maria Angelica Carrillo1,8, Juan Manuel Villa1, Sonia Diaz Monsalve1, Axel Kroeger1.
Abstract
During the Covid-19 pandemic, rich countries employed lockdown and physical distancing policies for transmission control. However, the question still remains whether these measures are also suitable in countries with a fragile economy, which rests mainly on the informal sector. The impacts of lockdown measures in disadvantaged population strata in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were reviewed using i) 93 media reports and ii) 17 published scientific papers. This review showed that those who suffered the most from the lockdown were migrants, workers in the large informal sector, small businesses, slum dwellers, women and elderly, revealing the social, cultural and economic inequalities of societies. Financial and food support for the poor was inadequate and sometimes mismanaged. In the better organized societies, the resilience was stronger (South Korea, Kerala/India) but here also the poor had to suffer the most. It is strongly recommended that outbreak response strategies should particularly focus on the poor and vulnerable population.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; corona virus; low- and middle-income countries; socio-economic impact
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33657984 PMCID: PMC8079077 DOI: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1878446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Glob Health ISSN: 2047-7724 Impact factor: 2.894