Literature DB >> 33657672

Factors Associated with the use of Mechanical Restraint in a Mental Health Hospitalization Unit: 8- Year Retrospective Analysis.

Jose I Pérez-Revuelta1,2, Rocío Torrecilla-Olavarrieta3, Edgar García-Spínola4, Ángela López-Martín1,4, Rafael Guerrero-Vida5, Jose M Mongil-San Juan5, Carmen Rodríguez-Gómez5, Juan M Pascual-Paño5, Francisco González-Sáiz2,4,6, Jose Mª Villagrán-Moreno4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical restraint is a controversial restrictive practice to manage agitation or violent behaviour. Numerous studies have evaluated the factors and organizational changes that influence on mechanical restraint, but only for short time periods. None of those studies have assessed the effects of measures applied within the framework of a long-term plan to reduce the use of mechanical restraint. Given the lack of specific legislation in Spain, more data are required for its proper regulation. AIM/QUESTION: To evaluate the risk factors associated and the impact of specific measures designed to minimize the application of mechanical restraint in an acute mental health unit over an 8-year period and previous observation of 5 years.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study based on a retrospective analysis of mechanical restraint records. We compared admissions requiring ≥ one episode of restraint versus admissions not requiring this coercive measure.
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2014, 412 admissions (12%) required mechanical restraint. The data show that the measures applied in the previous five years had significantly reduced the total hours of restraint per semester. The factors associated with admissions requiring mechanical restraint were: involuntary, unscheduled, and longer admissions. The best predictor of restraint was involuntary admission (OR = 6.37), followed by the diagnosis of personality disorder (OR = 5.01). DISCUSSION: Identification of the factors associated with mechanical restraint would allow for early detection strategies. Our results provide additional evidence on the usefulness of organizational changes to reduce coercive measures, even in a country without specific legislation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Organizational changes, such as staff training and increased family support during admission of episodes of mechanical restraint, can reduce the use of this measure. These measures also give the nursing staff greater responsibility in terms of their role in registering and monitoring the restrictive practice, thus helping to prevent or minimise the use of mechanical restraint. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute Mental Health; Emergency Psychiatry; Risk Assessment; Seclusion and Restraint; Service Management and Planning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33657672     DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  1 in total

1.  Physical Restraint Events in Psychiatric Hospitals in Hong Kong: A Cohort Register Study.

Authors:  Maritta Välimäki; Yuen Ting Joyce Lam; Kirsi Hipp; Po Yee Ivy Cheng; Tony Ng; Glendy Ip; Paul Lee; Teris Cheung; Daniel Bressington; Tella Lantta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.