Literature DB >> 33657635

A Perioperative Care Display for Understanding High Acuity Patients.

Laurie Lovett Novak1, Jonathan Wanderer2, David A Owens3, Daniel Fabbri1, Julian Z Genkins4, Thomas A Lasko1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The data visualization literature asserts that the details of the optimal data display must be tailored to the specific task, the background of the user, and the characteristics of the data. The general organizing principle of a concept-oriented display is known to be useful for many tasks and data types.
OBJECTIVES: In this project, we used general principles of data visualization and a co-design process to produce a clinical display tailored to a specific cognitive task, chosen from the anesthesia domain, but with clear generalizability to other clinical tasks. To support the work of the anesthesia-in-charge (AIC) our task was, for a given day, to depict the acuity level and complexity of each patient in the collection of those that will be operated on the following day. The AIC uses this information to optimally allocate anesthesia staff and providers across operating rooms.
METHODS: We used a co-design process to collaborate with participants who work in the AIC role. We conducted two in-depth interviews with AICs and engaged them in subsequent input on iterative design solutions.
RESULTS: Through a co-design process, we found (1) the need to carefully match the level of detail in the display to the level required by the clinical task, (2) the impedance caused by irrelevant information on the screen such as icons relevant only to other tasks, and (3) the desire for a specific but optional trajectory of increasingly detailed textual summaries.
CONCLUSION: This study reports a real-world clinical informatics development project that engaged users as co-designers. Our process led to the user-preferred design of a single binary flag to identify the subset of patients needing further investigation, and then a trajectory of increasingly detailed, text-based abstractions for each patient that can be displayed when more information is needed. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33657635      PMCID: PMC7929715          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  17 in total

1.  Summarization of clinical information: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Joshua C Feblowitz; Adam Wright; Hardeep Singh; Lipika Samal; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Novel displays of patient information in critical care settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosalie G Waller; Melanie C Wright; Noa Segall; Paige Nesbitt; Thomas Reese; Damian Borbolla; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Clinical Data Visualization: The Current State and Future Needs.

Authors:  Jonathan P Wanderer; Sara E Nelson; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Shelby Monahan; Soojin Park
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data.

Authors:  David T Bauer; Stephanie Guerlain; Patrick J Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Context-based electronic health record: toward patient specific healthcare.

Authors:  William Hsu; Ricky K Taira; Suzie El-Saden; Hooshang Kangarloo; Alex A T Bui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2012-03

6.  User-Centered Clinical Display Design Issues for Inpatient Providers.

Authors:  Thomas A Lasko; David A Owens; Daniel Fabbri; Jonathan P Wanderer; Julian Z Genkins; Laurie L Novak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 7.  Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivian L West; David Borland; W Ed Hammond
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Omar Hasan; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Presentation of clinical laboratory results: an experimental comparison of four visualization techniques.

Authors:  Torbjørn Torsvik; Børge Lillebo; Gustav Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Evidence-based design and evaluation of a whole genome sequencing clinical report for the reference microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Anamaria Crisan; Geoffrey McKee; Tamara Munzner; Jennifer L Gardy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.