Literature DB >> 33657114

Early versus deferred anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma in patients admitted for COVID-19: A randomized phase II clinical trial.

María Elvira Balcells1, Luis Rojas2,3, Nicole Le Corre4,5, Constanza Martínez-Valdebenito4,5, María Elena Ceballos1, Marcela Ferrés4,5, Mayling Chang6, Cecilia Vizcaya4, Sebastián Mondaca6, Álvaro Huete7, Ricardo Castro8, Mauricio Sarmiento6, Luis Villarroel9, Alejandra Pizarro1, Patricio Ross2, Jaime Santander10, Bárbara Lara11, Marcela Ferrada12, Sergio Vargas-Salas6, Carolina Beltrán-Pavez13,14, Ricardo Soto-Rifo13,14, Fernando Valiente-Echeverría13,14, Christian Caglevic15, Mauricio Mahave15, Carolina Selman15, Raimundo Gazitúa15, José Luis Briones15, Franz Villarroel-Espindola15,16, Carlos Balmaceda17, Manuel A Espinoza9, Jaime Pereira6, Bruno Nervi6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma (CP), despite limited evidence on its efficacy, is being widely used as a compassionate therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early CP therapy in COVID-19 progression. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: The study was an open-label, single-center randomized clinical trial performed in an academic medical center in Santiago, Chile, from May 10, 2020, to July 18, 2020, with final follow-up until August 17, 2020. The trial included patients hospitalized within the first 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset, presenting risk factors for illness progression and not on mechanical ventilation. The intervention consisted of immediate CP (early plasma group) versus no CP unless developing prespecified criteria of deterioration (deferred plasma group). Additional standard treatment was allowed in both arms. The primary outcome was a composite of mechanical ventilation, hospitalization for >14 days, or death. The key secondary outcomes included time to respiratory failure, days of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, mortality at 30 days, and SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR clearance rate. Of 58 randomized patients (mean age, 65.8 years; 50% male), 57 (98.3%) completed the trial. A total of 13 (43.3%) participants from the deferred group received plasma based on clinical aggravation. We failed to find benefit in the primary outcome (32.1% versus 33.3%, odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.32-2.84, p > 0.999) in the early versus deferred CP group. The in-hospital mortality rate was 17.9% versus 6.7% (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.54-17.17 p = 0.246), mechanical ventilation 17.9% versus 6.7% (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.54-17.17, p = 0.246), and prolonged hospitalization 21.4% versus 30.0% (OR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.19-2.10, p = 0.554) in the early versus deferred CP group, respectively. The viral clearance rate on day 3 (26% versus 8%, p = 0.204) and day 7 (38% versus 19%, p = 0.374) did not differ between groups. Two patients experienced serious adverse events within 6 hours after plasma transfusion. The main limitation of this study is the lack of statistical power to detect a smaller but clinically relevant therapeutic effect of CP, as well as not having confirmed neutralizing antibodies in donor before plasma infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we failed to find evidence of benefit in mortality, length of hospitalization, or mechanical ventilation requirement by immediate addition of CP therapy in the early stages of COVID-19 compared to its use only in case of patient deterioration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04375098.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33657114     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Med        ISSN: 1549-1277            Impact factor:   11.069


  31 in total

1.  Results of the CAPSID randomized trial for high-dose convalescent plasma in patients with severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Sixten Körper; Manfred Weiss; Daniel Zickler; Thomas Wiesmann; Kai Zacharowski; Victor M Corman; Beate Grüner; Lucas Ernst; Peter Spieth; Philipp M Lepper; Martin Bentz; Sebastian Zinn; Gregor Paul; Johannes Kalbhenn; Matthias M Dollinger; Peter Rosenberger; Thomas Kirschning; Thomas Thiele; Thomas Appl; Benjamin Mayer; Michael Schmidt; Christian Drosten; Hinnerk Wulf; Jan Matthias Kruse; Bettina Jungwirth; Erhard Seifried; Hubert Schrezenmeier
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhangcheng Fei; Zhongsheng Chen; Xi Du; Haijun Cao; Changqing Li
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.040

3.  A multicenter randomized open-label clinical trial for convalescent plasma in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Authors:  Cristina Avendaño-Solá; Antonio Ramos-Martínez; Elena Muñez-Rubio; Belen Ruiz-Antorán; Rosa Malo de Molina; Ferran Torres; Ana Fernández-Cruz; Jorge Calderón-Parra; Concepcion Payares-Herrera; Alberto Díaz de Santiago; Irene Romera-Martínez; Ilduara Pintos; Jaime Lora-Tamayo; Mikel Mancheño-Losa; Maria L Paciello; A L Martínez-González; Julia Vidán-Estévez; Maria J Nuñez-Orantos; Maria Isabel Saez-Serrano; Maria L Porras-Leal; Maria C Jarilla-Fernández; Paula Villares; Jaime Pérez de Oteyza; Ascension Ramos-Garrido; Lydia Blanco; Maria E Madrigal-Sánchez; Martin Rubio-Batllés; Ana Velasco-Iglesias; José R Paño-Pardo; J A Moreno-Chulilla; Eduardo Muñiz-Díaz; Inmaculada Casas-Flecha; Mayte Pérez-Olmeda; Javier García-Pérez; Jose Alcamí; Jose L Bueno; Rafael F Duarte
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy: hit fast, hit hard!

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Massimo Franchini
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.996

5.  Effect of time and titer in convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19.

Authors:  Paola de Candia; Francesco Prattichizzo; Silvia Garavelli; Rosalba La Grotta; Annunziata De Rosa; Agostina Pontarelli; Roberto Parrella; Antonio Ceriello; Giuseppe Matarese
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-22

6.  Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.

Authors:  Vanessa Piechotta; Claire Iannizzi; Khai Li Chai; Sarah J Valk; Catherine Kimber; Elena Dorando; Ina Monsef; Erica M Wood; Abigail A Lamikanra; David J Roberts; Zoe McQuilten; Cynthia So-Osman; Lise J Estcourt; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 7.  Plasma therapy: a passive resistance against the deadliest.

Authors:  Anita Hansda; Debarati Biswas; Aishwarya Bhatta; Nishant Chakravorty; Gayatri Mukherjee
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 8.  Development of Evidence-Based COVID-19 Management Guidelines for Local Context: The Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Sarah Nadeem; Salima Saleem Aamdani; Bushra Ayub; Nashia Ali Rizvi; Fatima Safi Arslan; Russell Seth Martins; Maria Khan; Syed Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Glob Health Epidemiol Genom       Date:  2022-04-20

9.  Early administration of COVID-19 convalescent plasma with high titer antibody content by live viral neutralization assay is associated with modest clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Artur Belov; Yin Huang; Carlos H Villa; Barbee I Whitaker; Richard Forshee; Steven A Anderson; Anne Eder; Nicole Verdun; Michael J Joyner; Scott R Wright; Rickey E Carter; Deborah T Hung; Mary Homer; Corey Hoffman; Michael Lauer; Peter Marks
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 13.265

10.  Role of red blood cell distribution width, as a prognostic indicator in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Soumya Sarkar; Sundara Kannan; Puneet Khanna; Akhil Kant Singh
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 11.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.