Rifat Özmen1, Muhammet Bozguney2, Ali İhsan Tekin2, Tamer Eroglu3, Aydin Tuncay1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Erciyes Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Kayseri, Turkey. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kayseri Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Kayseri, Turkey. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ömer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with hyperlactatemia, which leads to adverse clinical outcomes. No study has examined the effect of different clamping techniques on postoperative hyperlactatemia (PHL). Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of two different techniques on PHL and the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent isolated CPB either with single clamp technique (SCT, n=47) or double clamp technique (DCT, n=53). Demographic and preoperative laboratory data, as well as operative features and arterial blood lactate levels at the onset and at the end of CPB, were collected from patient charts. RESULTS: Blood lactate levels collected at the end of CPB did not differ significantly between groups whereas intraoperative lactate increased significantly in both groups (P<0.005). PHL developed in 16 patients (32%). There was no meaningful difference in SCT and DCT in this regard. Left internal mammary artery was used more frequently in the DCT group than in the SCT group. While the cross-clamp time was significantly longer in the SCT group, there was no difference regarding CPB time. Among postoperative complications, only the incidence of stroke was significantly higher in the DCT group than in the SCT group (10.6% vs. 0%, P=0.020). CPB time, cross-clamp time and numbers of proximal saphenous graft and distal anastomosis showed a significant positive correlation with the postoperative lactate level. In the regression analysis, CPB time emerged as the only independent predictor of PHL (OR 1.04, CI 95% 1.01-1.07, P=0.011). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in postoperative blood lactate levels between SCT and DCT groups.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with hyperlactatemia, which leads to adverse clinical outcomes. No study has examined the effect of different clamping techniques on postoperative hyperlactatemia (PHL). Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of two different techniques on PHL and the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent isolated CPB either with single clamp technique (SCT, n=47) or double clamp technique (DCT, n=53). Demographic and preoperative laboratory data, as well as operative features and arterial blood lactate levels at the onset and at the end of CPB, were collected from patient charts. RESULTS: Blood lactate levels collected at the end of CPB did not differ significantly between groups whereas intraoperative lactate increased significantly in both groups (P<0.005). PHL developed in 16 patients (32%). There was no meaningful difference in SCT and DCT in this regard. Left internal mammary artery was used more frequently in the DCT group than in the SCT group. While the cross-clamp time was significantly longer in the SCT group, there was no difference regarding CPB time. Among postoperative complications, only the incidence of stroke was significantly higher in the DCT group than in the SCT group (10.6% vs. 0%, P=0.020). CPB time, cross-clamp time and numbers of proximal saphenous graft and distal anastomosis showed a significant positive correlation with the postoperative lactate level. In the regression analysis, CPB time emerged as the only independent predictor of PHL (OR 1.04, CI 95% 1.01-1.07, P=0.011). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in postoperative blood lactate levels between SCT and DCT groups.
Authors: John C Tsang; Jean-Francois Morin; Christo I Tchervenkov; Robert W Platt; John Sampalis; Dominique Shum-Tim Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.620
Authors: Hrvoje Gasparovic; Marko Borojevic; Branko Malojcic; Kristina Gasparovic; Bojan Biocina Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: R W Kim; D C Mariconda; G Tellides; G S Kopf; M L Dewar; Z Lin; J A Elefteriades Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Meena Kalyanaraman; William M DeCampli; Andrew I Campbell; Utpal Bhalala; Terry G Harmon; Penelope Sandiford; Claire K McMahon; Shirah Shore; Timothy S Yeh Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Stuart J Head; Jochen Börgermann; Ruben L J Osnabrugge; Teresa M Kieser; Volkmar Falk; David P Taggart; John D Puskas; Jan F Gummert; Arie Pieter Kappetein Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Chun Shing Kwok; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Phyo K Myint; Azfar Zaman; Colin Berry; Bernard Keavney; Jim Nolan; Peter F Ludman; Mark A de Belder; Iain Buchan; Mamas A Mamas Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 29.983