Umberto Bracale1, Mauro Podda2, Simone Castiglioni3,4, Roberto Peltrini3, Alberto Sartori5, Alberto Arezzo6, Francesco Corcione3, Ferdinando Agresta7. 1. Department of General Surgery and Specialties, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy. umbertobracale@gmail.com. 2. Department of Emergency Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Di Monserrato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. 3. Department of General Surgery and Specialties, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy. 4. Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy. 5. Department of General, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Castelfranco and Montebelluna Hospitals, Treviso, Italy. 6. Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy. 7. Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Vittorio Veneto, ULSS 2, Marca Trevigiana, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The spread of the SARS-CoV2 virus, which causes COVID-19 disease, profoundly impacted the surgical community. Recommendations have been published to manage patients needing surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey, under the aegis of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, aims to analyze how Italian surgeons have changed their practice during the pandemic. METHODS: The authors designed an online survey that was circulated for completion to the Italian departments of general surgery registered in the Italian Ministry of Health database in December 2020. Questions were divided into three sections: hospital organization, screening policies, and safety profile of the surgical operation. The investigation periods were divided into the Italian pandemic phases I (March-May 2020), II (June-September 2020), and III (October-December 2020). RESULTS: Of 447 invited departments, 226 answered the survey. Most hospitals were treating both COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. The reduction in effective beds dedicated to surgical activity was significant, affecting 59% of the responding units. 12.4% of the respondents in phase I, 2.6% in phase II, and 7.7% in phase III reported that their surgical unit had been closed. 51.4%, 23.5%, and 47.8% of the respondents had at least one colleague reassigned to non-surgical COVID-19 activities during the three phases. There has been a reduction in elective (> 200 procedures: 2.1%, 20.6% and 9.9% in the three phases, respectively) and emergency (< 20 procedures: 43.3%, 27.1%, 36.5% in the three phases, respectively) surgical activity. The use of laparoscopy also had a setback in phase I (25.8% performed less than 20% of elective procedures through laparoscopy). 60.6% of the respondents used a smoke evacuation device during laparoscopy in phase I, 61.6% in phase II, and 64.2% in phase III. Almost all responders (82.8% vs. 93.2% vs. 92.7%) in each analyzed period did not modify or reduce the use of high-energy devices. CONCLUSION: This survey offers three faithful snapshots of how the surgical community has reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic during its three phases. The significant reduction in surgical activity indicates that better health policies and more evidence-based guidelines are needed to make up for lost time and surgery not performed during the pandemic.
BACKGROUND: The spread of the SARS-CoV2 virus, which causes COVID-19 disease, profoundly impacted the surgical community. Recommendations have been published to manage patients needing surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey, under the aegis of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, aims to analyze how Italian surgeons have changed their practice during the pandemic. METHODS: The authors designed an online survey that was circulated for completion to the Italian departments of general surgery registered in the Italian Ministry of Health database in December 2020. Questions were divided into three sections: hospital organization, screening policies, and safety profile of the surgical operation. The investigation periods were divided into the Italian pandemic phases I (March-May 2020), II (June-September 2020), and III (October-December 2020). RESULTS: Of 447 invited departments, 226 answered the survey. Most hospitals were treating both COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. The reduction in effective beds dedicated to surgical activity was significant, affecting 59% of the responding units. 12.4% of the respondents in phase I, 2.6% in phase II, and 7.7% in phase III reported that their surgical unit had been closed. 51.4%, 23.5%, and 47.8% of the respondents had at least one colleague reassigned to non-surgical COVID-19 activities during the three phases. There has been a reduction in elective (> 200 procedures: 2.1%, 20.6% and 9.9% in the three phases, respectively) and emergency (< 20 procedures: 43.3%, 27.1%, 36.5% in the three phases, respectively) surgical activity. The use of laparoscopy also had a setback in phase I (25.8% performed less than 20% of elective procedures through laparoscopy). 60.6% of the respondents used a smoke evacuation device during laparoscopy in phase I, 61.6% in phase II, and 64.2% in phase III. Almost all responders (82.8% vs. 93.2% vs. 92.7%) in each analyzed period did not modify or reduce the use of high-energy devices. CONCLUSION: This survey offers three faithful snapshots of how the surgical community has reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic during its three phases. The significant reduction in surgical activity indicates that better health policies and more evidence-based guidelines are needed to make up for lost time and surgery not performed during the pandemic.
Authors: Giulio A Santoro; Ugo Grossi; Sthela Murad-Regadas; Joseph W Nunoo-Mensah; Anders Mellgren; Gian Luca Di Tanna; Gaetano Gallo; Charles Tsang; Steven D Wexner Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Marco Milone; Francesco Maria Carrano; Emina Letić; Andreas Shamiyeh; Antonello Forgione; Bang Wool Eom; Beat P Müller-Stich; Carmen Balagué Ponz; Christos Kontovounisios; Daniel Preda; Dejan Ignjatovic; Elisa Cassinotti; Eugenia Yiannakopoulou; George Theodoropoulos; Gil Faria; Luca Morelli; Marguerite Gorter-Stam; Sheraz Markar; Thanjakumar Arulampalam; Therese Velthoven; Stavros A Antoniou; Nader K Francis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Alberto Arezzo; Nader Francis; Yoav Mintz; Michel Adamina; Stavros A Antoniou; Nicole Bouvy; Catalin Copaescu; Nicolò de Manzini; Nicola Di Lorenzo; Salvador Morales-Conde; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel; Dorin Popa; Diana Tait; Cenydd Thomas; Susan Nimmo; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Andrea Pietrabissa Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Antonio Giuliani; Pasquale Avella; Anna Lucia Segreto; Maria Lucia Izzo; Antonio Buondonno; Mariagrazia Coluzzi; Micaela Cappuccio; Maria Chiara Brunese; Roberto Vaschetti; Andrea Scacchi; Germano Guerra; Bruno Amato; Fulvio Calise; Aldo Rocca Journal: Front Surg Date: 2021-12-21
Authors: Antonio Buondonno; Pasquale Avella; Micaela Cappuccio; Andrea Scacchi; Roberto Vaschetti; Giancarlo Di Marzo; Pietro Maida; Claudio Luciani; Bruno Amato; Maria Chiara Brunese; Daniela Esposito; Lucio Selvaggi; Germano Guerra; Aldo Rocca Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-03-24
Authors: Ugo Grossi; Gaetano Gallo; Monica Ortenzi; Marco Piccino; Nick Salimian; Mario Guerrieri; Giuseppe Sammarco; Carla Felice; Giulio Aniello Santoro; Salomone Di Saverio; Gian Luca Di Tanna; Giacomo Zanus Journal: Health Sci Rev (Oxf) Date: 2022-03-10
Authors: Daisy Elliott; Cynthia Ochieng; Marcus Jepson; Natalie S Blencowe; Kerry Nl Avery; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Sian Cousins; Anni Skilton; Peter Hutchinson; David Jayne; Martin Birchall; Jane M Blazeby; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 2.692