Shao-Wei Chen1,2, Yi-Hsin Chan3, Chia-Pin Lin3, Victor Chien-Chia Wu3, Yu-Ting Cheng3, Dong-Yi Chen3, Shang-Hung Chang2,3, Kuo-Chun Hung3, Pao-Hsien Chu3, An-Hsun Chou4. 1. Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. 2. Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. 3. Department of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Abstract
Importance: The associations between long-term treatment of aortic dissection with various medications and late patient outcomes are poorly understood. Objective: To compare late outcomes after long-term use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or other antihypertensive medications (controls) among patients treated for aortic dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan included 6978 adult patients with a first-ever aortic dissection who survived to hospital discharge during the period between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, and who received during the first 90 days after discharge a prescription for an ACEI, ARB, β-blocker, or at least 1 other antihypertensive medication. Data analysis was conducted from July 2019 to June 2020. Exposure: Long-term use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs, with use of other antihypertensive medications as a control. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, death due to aortic aneurism or dissection, later aortic operation, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, hospital readmission, and new-onset dialysis. Results: Of 6978 total participants, 3492 received a β-blocker, 1729 received an ACEI or ARB, and 1757 received another antihypertension drug. Compared with patients in the other 2 groups, those in the β-blocker group were younger (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [13.9] years vs 68.7 [13.5] years for ACEIs or ARBs and 69.9 [13.8] years for controls) and comprised more male patients (2520 [72.2%] vs 1161 [67.1%] for ACEIs or ARBs and 1224 [69.7%] for controls). The prevalence of medicated hypertension was highest in the ACEI or ARB group (1039 patients [60.1%]), followed by the control group (896 patients [51.0%]), and was lowest in the β-blocker group (1577 patients [45.2%]). Patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection were more likely to be prescribed β-blockers (1134 patients [32.5%]) than an ACEI or ARB (309 patients [17.9%]) or another antihypertension medication (376 patients [21.4%]). After adjusting for multiple propensity scores, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical characteristics among the 3 groups. No differences in the risks for all outcomes were observed between the ACEI or ARB and β-blocker groups. The risk of all-cause hospital readmission was significantly lower in the ACEI or ARB group (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.997) and β-blocker group (subdistribution HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94) than in the control group. Moreover, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ACEI or ARB group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and the β-blocker group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) than in the control group. In addition, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ARB group than in the ACEI group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance: The use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with benefits in the long-term treatment of aortic dissection.
Importance: The associations between long-term treatment of aortic dissection with various medications and late patient outcomes are poorly understood. Objective: To compare late outcomes after long-term use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or other antihypertensive medications (controls) among patients treated for aortic dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan included 6978 adult patients with a first-ever aortic dissection who survived to hospital discharge during the period between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, and who received during the first 90 days after discharge a prescription for an ACEI, ARB, β-blocker, or at least 1 other antihypertensive medication. Data analysis was conducted from July 2019 to June 2020. Exposure: Long-term use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs, with use of other antihypertensive medications as a control. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, death due to aortic aneurism or dissection, later aortic operation, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, hospital readmission, and new-onset dialysis. Results: Of 6978 total participants, 3492 received a β-blocker, 1729 received an ACEI or ARB, and 1757 received another antihypertension drug. Compared with patients in the other 2 groups, those in the β-blocker group were younger (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [13.9] years vs 68.7 [13.5] years for ACEIs or ARBs and 69.9 [13.8] years for controls) and comprised more male patients (2520 [72.2%] vs 1161 [67.1%] for ACEIs or ARBs and 1224 [69.7%] for controls). The prevalence of medicated hypertension was highest in the ACEI or ARB group (1039 patients [60.1%]), followed by the control group (896 patients [51.0%]), and was lowest in the β-blocker group (1577 patients [45.2%]). Patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection were more likely to be prescribed β-blockers (1134 patients [32.5%]) than an ACEI or ARB (309 patients [17.9%]) or another antihypertension medication (376 patients [21.4%]). After adjusting for multiple propensity scores, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical characteristics among the 3 groups. No differences in the risks for all outcomes were observed between the ACEI or ARB and β-blocker groups. The risk of all-cause hospital readmission was significantly lower in the ACEI or ARB group (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.997) and β-blocker group (subdistribution HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94) than in the control group. Moreover, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ACEI or ARB group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and the β-blocker group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) than in the control group. In addition, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ARB group than in the ACEI group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance: The use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with benefits in the long-term treatment of aortic dissection.
Authors: Toru Suzuki; Eric M Isselbacher; Christoph A Nienaber; Reed E Pyeritz; Kim A Eagle; Thomas T Tsai; Jeanna V Cooper; James L Januzzi; Alan C Braverman; Daniel G Montgomery; Rossella Fattori; Linda Pape; Kevin M Harris; Anna Booher; Jae K Oh; Mark Peterson; Vijay S Ramanath; James B Froehlich Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Marieke Dingena Spreeuwenberg; Anna Bartak; Marcel A Croon; Jacques A Hagenaars; Jan J V Busschbach; Helene Andrea; Jos Twisk; Theo Stijnen Journal: Med Care Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Karen A Hicks; James E Tcheng; Biykem Bozkurt; Bernard R Chaitman; Donald E Cutlip; Andrew Farb; Gregg C Fonarow; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Michael R Jaff; Judith H Lichtman; Marian C Limacher; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Roxana Mehran; Steven E Nissen; Eric E Smith; Shari L Targum Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-12-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H Nagashima; Y Sakomura; Y Aoka; K Uto; M Ogawa; S Aomi; H Koyanagi; N Ishizuka; M Naruse; M Kawana; H Kasanuki Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Fatini; G Pratesi; F Sofi; F Gensini; E Sticchi; B Lari; R Pulli; W Dorigo; L Azas; C Pratesi; G F Gensini; R Abbate Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Peter Matt; Jennifer Habashi; Thierry Carrel; Duke E Cameron; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Harry C Dietz Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Michael Mullen; Xu Yu Jin; Anne Child; A Graham Stuart; Matthew Dodd; José Antonio Aragon-Martin; David Gaze; Anatoli Kiotsekoglou; Li Yuan; Jiangting Hu; Claire Foley; Laura Van Dyck; Rosemary Knight; Tim Clayton; Lorna Swan; John D R Thomson; Guliz Erdem; David Crossman; Marcus Flather Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matheus F R A Oliveira; Walter E M Rocha; Julia D Soares; Victor M F S L'Armée; Mayara P G Martins; Aloísio M Rocha; Audes D M Feitosa; Ricardo C Lima; Pedro P M Oliveira; Lindemberg M Silveira-Filho; Otavio R Coelho-Filho; José R Matos-Souza; Orlando Petrucci; Andrei C Sposito; Wilson Nadruz Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-01-21
Authors: Maroun Chedid; Hasan-Daniel Kaidbay; Stijn Wigerinck; Yaman Mkhaimer; Byron Smith; Dalia Zubidat; Imranjot Sekhon; Reddy Prajwal; Parikshit Duriseti; Naim Issa; Ziad M Zoghby; Christian Hanna; Sarah R Senum; Peter C Harris; LaTonya J Hickson; Vicente E Torres; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Fouad T Chebib Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2022-06-11