Laurie E Powell1, Jeff Gau, Ann Glang, John D Corrigan, Meghan Ramirez, Jody Slocumb. 1. The Center on Brain Injury Research and Training, University of Oregon, Eugene (Drs Powell and Glang, Mr Gau, and Mss Ramirez and Slocumb); and Ohio Valley Center for Brain Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Corrigan).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the online, self-guided, interactive Staff TBI Skill Builder training program for paraprofessional staff. DESIGN: A within-subjects, nonexperimental evaluation involving 79 paraprofessionals and professionals working across a range of settings. Participants completed a pretest (T1), a posttest immediately upon program completion (T2), and follow-up (T3) 60 days after program completion. MEASURES: (1) Knowledge of basic traumatic brain injury facts; (2) knowledge application; (3) self-efficacy in responding to text-based application scenarios; (4) self-report of skill utilization and effectiveness; and (5) program satisfaction (ease-of-use and usefulness). RESULTS: Participants demonstrated high levels of knowledge, knowledge application, and self-efficacy at pretest. Despite the high pretest levels, participants showed significant improvements in knowledge application (d = 0.50) after using the program. Nonsignificant gains in knowledge (d = 0.13) and self-efficacy (d = 0.02) were found. The use of selected skills significantly increased from posttest to follow-up. Participants reported high program satisfaction; 99% of the participants indicated that they would recommend the program to others. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the feasibility of providing interactive, online training for paraprofessionals serving adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the online, self-guided, interactive Staff TBI Skill Builder training program for paraprofessional staff. DESIGN: A within-subjects, nonexperimental evaluation involving 79 paraprofessionals and professionals working across a range of settings. Participants completed a pretest (T1), a posttest immediately upon program completion (T2), and follow-up (T3) 60 days after program completion. MEASURES: (1) Knowledge of basic traumatic brain injury facts; (2) knowledge application; (3) self-efficacy in responding to text-based application scenarios; (4) self-report of skill utilization and effectiveness; and (5) program satisfaction (ease-of-use and usefulness). RESULTS: Participants demonstrated high levels of knowledge, knowledge application, and self-efficacy at pretest. Despite the high pretest levels, participants showed significant improvements in knowledge application (d = 0.50) after using the program. Nonsignificant gains in knowledge (d = 0.13) and self-efficacy (d = 0.02) were found. The use of selected skills significantly increased from posttest to follow-up. Participants reported high program satisfaction; 99% of the participants indicated that they would recommend the program to others. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the feasibility of providing interactive, online training for paraprofessionals serving adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.
Authors: David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori Journal: Acad Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ann E Glang; Melissa McCart; Jody Slocumb; Jeff M Gau; Susan C Davies; Doug Gomez; Laura Beck Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Larah van der Meer; Tamyra Matthews; Emily Ogilvie; Alice Berry; Hannah Waddington; Susan Balandin; Mark F O'Reilly; Giulio Lancioni; Jeff Sigafoos Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 2.408