Literature DB >> 33655566

Low pre-stimulus EEG alpha power amplifies visual awareness but not visual sensitivity.

Christopher S Y Benwell1, Andra Coldea2, Monika Harvey2, Gregor Thut2.   

Abstract

Pre-stimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to the level of awareness of sensory stimuli. More specifically, the power of low-frequency oscillations (primarily in the alpha-band, i.e., 8-14 Hz) prior to stimulus onset is inversely related to measures of subjective performance in visual tasks, such as confidence and visual awareness. Intriguingly, the same EEG signature does not seem to influence objective measures of task performance (i.e., accuracy). We here examined whether this dissociation holds when stringent accuracy measures are used. Previous EEG-studies have employed 2-alternative forced choice (2-AFC) discrimination tasks to link pre-stimulus oscillatory activity to correct/incorrect responses as an index of accuracy/objective performance at the single-trial level. However, 2-AFC tasks do not provide a good estimate of single-trial accuracy, as many of the responses classified as correct will be contaminated by guesses (with the chance correct response rate being 50%). Here instead, we employed a 19-AFC letter identification task to measure accuracy and the subjectively reported level of perceptual awareness on each trial. As the correct guess rate is negligible (~5%), this task provides a purer measure of accuracy. Our results replicate the inverse relationship between pre-stimulus alpha/beta-band power and perceptual awareness ratings in the absence of a link to discrimination accuracy. Pre-stimulus oscillatory phase did not predict either subjective awareness or accuracy. Our results hence confirm a dissociation of the pre-stimulus EEG power-task performance link for subjective versus objective measures of performance, and further substantiate pre-stimulus alpha power as a neural predictor of visual awareness.
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha; oscillations; perceptual awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33655566     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.698


  7 in total

1.  Spontaneous Alpha-Band Oscillations Bias Subjective Contrast Perception.

Authors:  Elio Balestrieri; Niko A Busch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Rhythmic interactions between the mediodorsal thalamus and prefrontal cortex precede human visual perception.

Authors:  Benjamin J Griffiths; Tino Zaehle; Stefan Repplinger; Friedhelm C Schmitt; Jürgen Voges; Simon Hanslmayr; Tobias Staudigl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Effects of Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Alpha-Band on Visual Perception Depend on Deviation From Alpha-Peak Frequency: Faster Relative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alpha-Pace Improves Performance.

Authors:  Andra Coldea; Domenica Veniero; Stephanie Morand; Jelena Trajkovic; Vincenzo Romei; Monika Harvey; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Periodic attention operates faster during more complex visual search.

Authors:  Garance Merholz; Laetitia Grabot; Rufin VanRullen; Laura Dugué
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  From Shorter to Longer Timescales: Converging Integrated Information Theory (IIT) with the Temporo-Spatial Theory of Consciousness (TTC).

Authors:  Georg Northoff; Federico Zilio
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Seeing a Bayesian ghost: Sensorimotor activation leads to an illusory social perception.

Authors:  Elisabeth V C Friedrich; Imme C Zillekens; Anna Lena Biel; Dariusz O'Leary; Eva Victoria Seegenschmiedt; Johannes Singer; Leonhard Schilbach; Paul Sauseng
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-14

7.  Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited.

Authors:  Christian Keitel; Manuela Ruzzoli; Laura Dugué; Niko A Busch; Christopher S Y Benwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.