Literature DB >> 33655426

A method for detection of inattentional feature blindness.

Aire Raidvee1, Mai Toom2, Jüri Allik2,3.   

Abstract

In ensemble displays, two principal factors determine the precision with which the mean value of some perceptual attribute, such as size and orientation, can be discriminated: inefficiency and representational noise of each element. Inefficiency is mainly caused by biased inference, or by inattentional (feature) blindness (i.e., some elements or their features are not processed). Here, we define inattentional feature blindness as an inability to perceive the value(s) of certain feature(s) of an object while the presence of the object itself may be registered. Separation of the effects of inattentional (feature) blindness and perceptual noise has escaped traditional analytic methods because of their trade-off effects on the slope of the psychometric discrimination function. Here, we propose a method that can separate the effects of inattentional feature blindness from that of the representational noise. The basic idea is to display a set of elements from which only one contains information relevant for solving the task, while all other elements are "dummies" carrying no useful information because they do not differ from the reference. If the single informative element goes unprocessed, the correct answer can only be given by a random guess. The guess rate can be modeled similarly to the lapse rate, traditionally represented by λ. As an illustration, we present evidence that the presence versus lack of inattentional feature blindness in orientation pooling depends on the feature types present in the display.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble perception; Inattentional feature blindness; Lapsing rate; Representational noise

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33655426     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02234-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  21 in total

1.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

2.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Studies of psychophysical methods for measuring visual thresholds.

Authors:  H R BLACKWELL
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1952-09

4.  Lapse resistance in the verbal letter reporting task.

Authors:  Aries Arditi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

Review 7.  Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition.

Authors:  George A Alvarez
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  An almost general theory of mean size perception.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Mai Toom; Aire Raidvee; Kristiina Averin; Kairi Kreegipuu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Obligatory averaging in mean size perception.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Mai Toom; Aire Raidvee; Kristiina Averin; Kairi Kreegipuu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots.

Authors:  A Burgess; H B Barlow
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.