Kyla D Brezitski1, Alexander W Goff1, Paige DeBenedittis1,2, Ravi Karra3,4,5,6. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 102152, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 2. Regeneration Next, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 102152, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. ravi.karra@duke.edu. 4. Regeneration Next, Durham, NC, USA. ravi.karra@duke.edu. 5. Department of Pathology, Durham, NC, USA. ravi.karra@duke.edu. 6. Center for Aging, Durham, NC, USA. ravi.karra@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The replenishment of lost or damaged myocardium has the potential to reverse heart failure, making heart regeneration a goal for cardiovascular medicine. Unlike adult mammals, injury to the zebrafish or neonatal mouse heart induces a robust regenerative program with minimal scarring. Recent insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of heart regeneration suggest that the machinery for regeneration is conserved from zebrafish to mammals. Here, we will review conserved mechanisms of heart regeneration and their translational implications. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on studies in zebrafish and neonatal mice, cardiomyocyte proliferation has emerged as a primary strategy for effecting regeneration in the adult mammalian heart. Recent work has revealed pathways for stimulating cardiomyocyte cell cycle reentry; potential developmental barriers for cardiomyocyte proliferation; and the critical role of additional cell types to support heart regeneration. Studies in zebrafish and neonatal mice have established a template for heart regeneration. Continued comparative work has the potential to inform the translation of regenerative biology into therapeutics.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The replenishment of lost or damaged myocardium has the potential to reverse heart failure, making heart regeneration a goal for cardiovascular medicine. Unlike adult mammals, injury to the zebrafish or neonatal mouse heart induces a robust regenerative program with minimal scarring. Recent insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of heart regeneration suggest that the machinery for regeneration is conserved from zebrafish to mammals. Here, we will review conserved mechanisms of heart regeneration and their translational implications. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on studies in zebrafish and neonatal mice, cardiomyocyte proliferation has emerged as a primary strategy for effecting regeneration in the adult mammalian heart. Recent work has revealed pathways for stimulating cardiomyocyte cell cycle reentry; potential developmental barriers for cardiomyocyte proliferation; and the critical role of additional cell types to support heart regeneration. Studies in zebrafish and neonatal mice have established a template for heart regeneration. Continued comparative work has the potential to inform the translation of regenerative biology into therapeutics.
Authors: W E Holmes; M X Sliwkowski; R W Akita; W J Henzel; J Lee; J W Park; D Yansura; N Abadi; H Raab; G D Lewis Journal: Science Date: 1992-05-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas Eschenhagen; Roberto Bolli; Thomas Braun; Loren J Field; Bernd K Fleischmann; Jonas Frisén; Mauro Giacca; Joshua M Hare; Steven Houser; Richard T Lee; Eduardo Marbán; James F Martin; Jeffery D Molkentin; Charles E Murry; Paul R Riley; Pilar Ruiz-Lozano; Hesham A Sadek; Mark A Sussman; Joseph A Hill Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Todd Heallen; Yuka Morikawa; John Leach; Ge Tao; James T Willerson; Randy L Johnson; James F Martin Journal: Development Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Bao N Puente; Wataru Kimura; Shalini A Muralidhar; Jesung Moon; James F Amatruda; Kate L Phelps; David Grinsfelder; Beverly A Rothermel; Rui Chen; Joseph A Garcia; Celio X Santos; SuWannee Thet; Eiichiro Mori; Michael T Kinter; Paul M Rindler; Serena Zacchigna; Shibani Mukherjee; David J Chen; Ahmed I Mahmoud; Mauro Giacca; Peter S Rabinovitch; Asaithamby Aroumougame; Ajay M Shah; Luke I Szweda; Hesham A Sadek Journal: Cell Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Hessel Honkoop; Dennis Em de Bakker; Alla Aharonov; Fabian Kruse; Avraham Shakked; Phong D Nguyen; Cecilia de Heus; Laurence Garric; Mauro J Muraro; Adam Shoffner; Federico Tessadori; Joshua Craiger Peterson; Wendy Noort; Alberto Bertozzi; Gilbert Weidinger; George Posthuma; Dominic Grün; Willem J van der Laarse; Judith Klumperman; Richard T Jaspers; Kenneth D Poss; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Eldad Tzahor; Jeroen Bakkers Journal: Elife Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Myra N Chávez; Rodrigo A Morales; Camila López-Crisosto; Juan Carlos Roa; Miguel L Allende; Sergio Lavandero Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Emily M Nordquist; Punashi Dutta; Karthik M Kodigepalli; Carol Mattern; Michael R McDermott; Aaron J Trask; Stephanie LaHaye; Volkhard Lindner; Joy Lincoln Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Hanjay Wang; Terrence Pong; Oluwatomisin O Obafemi; Haley J Lucian; Joy Aparicio-Valenzuela; Nicholas A Tran; Danielle M Mullis; Stefan Elde; Yuko Tada; Sam W Baker; Caroline Y Wang; Kevin J Cyr; Michael J Paulsen; Yuanjia Zhu; Anson M Lee; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-09