| Literature DB >> 33654480 |
M Poongodi1, Mounir Hamdi2, Mohit Malviya3, Ashutosh Sharma4, Gaurav Dhiman5, S Vimal5.
Abstract
Since the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak keeps on spreading all through the world, scientists have been crafting varied technologies mainly focusing on AI for an approach to acknowledge the difficulties of the epidemic. In this current worldwide emergency, the clinical business is searching for new advancements to screen and combat COVID-19 contamination. Strategies used by artificial intelligence can stretch screen the spread of the infection, distinguish highly infected patients, and be compelling in supervising the illness continuously. The artificial intelligence anticipation can further be used for passing dangers by sufficiently dissecting information from past sufferers. International patient support with recommendations for population testing, medical care, notification, and infection control can help fight this deadly virus. We proposed the hybrid deep learning method to diagnose COVID-19. The layered approach is used here to measure the symptom level of the patients and to analyze the patient image data whether he/she is positive with COVID-19. This work utilizes smart AI techniques to predict and diagnose the coronavirus rapidly by the Oura smart ring within 24 h. In the laboratory, a coronavirus rapid test is prepared with the help of a deep learning model using the RNN and CNN algorithms to diagnose the coronavirus rapidly and accurately. The result shows the value 0 or 1. The result 1 indicates the person is affected with coronavirus and the result 0 indicates the person is not affected with coronavirus. X-Ray and CT image classifications are considered here so that the threshold value is utilized for identifying an individual's health condition from the initial stage to a severe stage. Threshold value 0.5 is used to identify coronavirus initial stage condition and 1 is used to identify the coronavirus severe condition of the patient. The proposed methods are utilized for four weighting parameters to reduce both false positive and false negative image classification results for rapid and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; COVID-19; Diagnosis; Drug; Image acquisition; Machine learning
Year: 2021 PMID: 33654480 PMCID: PMC7908947 DOI: 10.1007/s00779-021-01541-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pers Ubiquitous Comput ISSN: 1617-4909 Impact factor: 3.006
Fig. 1Possible symptoms of COVID-19
Fig. 2The Oura smart ring [22]
Fig. 3Social distancing detector [26]
Summary of laboratory testing and medical imaging-based methods for COVID-19 applications [34]
| S.No | Data | Modality | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The patient’s RNA samples are collected from a throat swab and a specific enzyme is added to turn the RNA into two-stranded DNA | RT-PCR | If the patient’s both DNA results are positive, then the person is affected with COVID-19. The result ranges vary from 60–70% to 95–97% |
| 2 | Sputum sample | Molecular point-of-care | Automated type of test results produced within 30 min |
| 3 | Chest image | CT | CT-Based COVID-19 diagnosis results are better than those RT-PCR can offer (80–90%). But those of RT-PCR are on the low side of 60–70%. The problem with CT scan is the radiology person has to clean the scanners in between patients with a high risk of COVID-19 |
| 4 | Chest image | X-Ray | X-Ray results are insensitive compared to those with CT scan. But compared to CT scan, X-ray machines are easier to clean |
| 5 | Chest image | Ultrasound CT | The ultrasound CT scan result is better than the X-ray image. But ultrasound requires closer contact between the physician and the patient which may increase contamination risks for the staff |
| 6 | Chest image | PET-CT | This technique takes more time to diagnose COVID-19 results compared to other methods |
| 7 | Chest image | CT | AI-based CT assessment using deep learning principles to detect COVID-19 on chest CT scans. Gozes et al. report a sensitivity of 98.2%, but an impressive specificity of 92.2% for their deep learning-based thoracic CT algorithm. But the problem is some persons are infected with pneumonia with COVID-19. Alibaba used segmentation and quantification of lung infection regions to differentiate COVID-19–based pneumonia and other pneumonia cases with an accuracy of 96% |
Fig. 4Proposed deep learning methods for diagnosing COVID-19
Fig. 5Prediction and process layer internal process for diagnosing COVID-19
X-Ray image classification result using RNN and CNN for COVID-19 detection
| Threshold | True positive (COVID-19) | False positive (non-COVID-19) | True negative (COVID-19) | False negative (non-COVID-19) | Total number of tested images | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 65 | 41 | 1115 | 85 | 1306 | 43.33 | 96.45 | 90.35 |
| 0.6 | 70 | 36 | 1124 | 76 | 47.94 | 96.89 | 91.42 | |
| 0.7 | 75 | 31 | 1135 | 65 | 53.57 | 97.34 | 92.64 | |
| 0.8 | 79 | 27 | 1148 | 52 | 60.30 | 97.70 | 93.95 | |
| 0.9 | 85 | 21 | 1160 | 40 | 68.00 | 98.22 | 95.32 | |
| 1 | 96 | 10 | 1180 | 20 | 82.75 | 99.15 | 97.70 |
CT scan image classification result using RNN and CNN for COVID-19 detection
| Threshold | True positive (COVID-19) | False positive (non-COVID-19) | True negative (COVID-19) | False negative (non-COVID-19) | Total number of tested images | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 88 | 24 | 1320 | 34 | 1466 | 72.13 | 98.21 | 96.04 |
| 0.6 | 91 | 21 | 1325 | 29 | 75.83 | 98.43 | 96.58 | |
| 0.7 | 96 | 16 | 1330 | 24 | 80.00 | 98.81 | 97.27 | |
| 0.8 | 100 | 12 | 1338 | 16 | 86.20 | 99.11 | 98.09 | |
| 0.9 | 104 | 8 | 1342 | 12 | 89.65 | 99.40 | 98.63 | |
| 1 | 108 | 4 | 1348 | 6 | 94.73 | 99.70 | 99.31 |
Fig. 6X-Ray image COVID-19 detection accuracy (%) with respect to threshold
Fig. 7CT scan image COVID-19 detection accuracy (%) with respect to threshold
Fig. 8Structure of disease (https://twitter.com/SpirosMargaris)
Fig. 9Healthcare framework [41]