Literature DB >> 33654202

Dissociable electrophysiological measures of natural language processing reveal differences in speech comprehension strategy in healthy ageing.

Michael P Broderick1, Giovanni M Di Liberto2, Andrew J Anderson3,4, Adrià Rofes5, Edmund C Lalor6,3,4.   

Abstract

Healthy ageing leads to changes in the brain that impact upon sensory and cognitive processing. It is not fully clear how these changes affect the processing of everyday spoken language. Prediction is thought to play an important role in language comprehension, where information about upcoming words is pre-activated across multiple representational levels. However, evidence from electrophysiology suggests differences in how older and younger adults use context-based predictions, particularly at the level of semantic representation. We investigate these differences during natural speech comprehension by presenting older and younger subjects with continuous, narrative speech while recording their electroencephalogram. We use time-lagged linear regression to test how distinct computational measures of (1) semantic dissimilarity and (2) lexical surprisal are processed in the brains of both groups. Our results reveal dissociable neural correlates of these two measures that suggest differences in how younger and older adults successfully comprehend speech. Specifically, our results suggest that, while younger and older subjects both employ context-based lexical predictions, older subjects are significantly less likely to pre-activate the semantic features relating to upcoming words. Furthermore, across our group of older adults, we show that the weaker the neural signature of this semantic pre-activation mechanism, the lower a subject's semantic verbal fluency score. We interpret these findings as prediction playing a generally reduced role at a semantic level in the brains of older listeners during speech comprehension and that these changes may be part of an overall strategy to successfully comprehend speech with reduced cognitive resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33654202      PMCID: PMC7925601          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84597-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  67 in total

1.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults.

Authors:  Roberto Cabeza; Nicole D Anderson; Jill K Locantore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  At what time is the cocktail party? A late locus of selective attention to natural speech.

Authors:  Alan J Power; John J Foxe; Emma-Jane Forde; Richard B Reilly; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural responses to uninterrupted natural speech can be extracted with precise temporal resolution.

Authors:  Edmund C Lalor; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Neural processing during older adults' comprehension of spoken sentences: age differences in resource allocation and connectivity.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Vanessa Troiani; Arthur Wingfield; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Multiway canonical correlation analysis of brain data.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Dorothée Arzounian; Daniel D E Wong; Jens Hjortkjær; Søren Fuglsang; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai; William W Graves; Lisa L Conant
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  On the Role of Neural Oscillations Across Timescales in Speech and Music Processing.

Authors:  G Nike Gnanateja; Dhatri S Devaraju; Matthias Heyne; Yina M Quique; Kevin R Sitek; Monique C Tardif; Rachel Tessmer; Heather R Dial
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Effects of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Early and Late Cortical Representations of Competing Talkers in Noise.

Authors:  Emina Alickovic; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Lorenz Fiedler; Sébastien Santurette; Hamish Innes-Brown; Carina Graversen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Effects of Age on Cortical Tracking of Word-Level Features of Continuous Competing Speech.

Authors:  Juraj Mesik; Lucia Ray; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Linear Modeling of Neurophysiological Responses to Speech and Other Continuous Stimuli: Methodological Considerations for Applied Research.

Authors:  Michael J Crosse; Nathaniel J Zuk; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Aaron R Nidiffer; Sophie Molholm; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Editorial: Neural Tracking: Closing the Gap Between Neurophysiology and Translational Medicine.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; Jens Hjortkjær; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Age-related deficits in dip-listening evident for isolated sentences but not for spoken stories.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Björn Herrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.