Literature DB >> 33654166

Machine learning-based prediction model using clinico-pathologic factors for papillary thyroid carcinoma recurrence.

Young Min Park1, Byung-Joo Lee2.   

Abstract

This study analyzed the prognostic significance of clinico-pathologic factors, including the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) and lymph node ratio (LNR), in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and attempted to construct a disease recurrence prediction model using machine learning techniques. We retrospectively analyzed clinico-pathologic data from 1040 patients diagnosed with PTC between 2003 and 2009. We analyzed clinico-pathologic factors related to recurrence through logistic regression analysis. Among the factors that we included, only sex and tumor size were significantly correlated with disease recurrence. Parameters such as age, sex, tumor size, tumor multiplicity, ETE, ENE, pT, pN, ipsilateral central LN metastasis, contralateral central LNs metastasis, number of metastatic LNs, and LNR were input for construction of a machine learning prediction model. The performance of five machine learning models related to recurrence prediction was compared based on accuracy. The Decision Tree model showed the best accuracy at 95%, and the lightGBM and stacking model together showed 93% accuracy. Among those factors mentioned above, LNR and contralateral LN metastasis were used as important features in all machine learning prediction models. We confirmed that all machine learning prediction models showed an accuracy of 90% or more for predicting disease recurrence in PTC. LNR and contralateral LN metastasis were used as important features for constructing a robust machine learning prediction model. In the future, we have a plan to perform large-scale multicenter clinical studies to improve the performance of our prediction models and verify their clinical effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33654166      PMCID: PMC7925610          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84504-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  34 in total

1.  A novel classification system for patients with PTC: addition of the new variables of large (3 cm or greater) nodal metastases and reclassification during the follow-up period.

Authors:  Iwao Sugitani; Nobukatsu Kasai; Yoshihide Fujimoto; Akio Yanagisawa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Transfer learning for classification of cardiovascular tissues in histological images.

Authors:  Claudia Mazo; Jose Bernal; Maria Trujillo; Enrique Alegre
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What is new and what has changed?

Authors:  Bryan R Haugen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Lymph node ratio of the central compartment is a significant predictor for locoregional recurrence after prophylactic central neck dissection in patients with thyroid papillary carcinoma.

Authors:  In Sun Ryu; Chan Il Song; Seung-Ho Choi; Jong-Lyel Roh; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Iain J Nixon; Deborah Kuk; Volkert Wreesmann; Luc Morris; Frank L Palmer; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Bhuvanesh Singh; R Michael Tuttle; Ashok R Shaha; Mithat Gönen; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Association of BRAF V600E mutation with poor clinicopathological outcomes in 500 consecutive cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Cristiana Lupi; Riccardo Giannini; Clara Ugolini; Agnese Proietti; Piero Berti; Michele Minuto; Gabriele Materazzi; Rossella Elisei; Massimo Santoro; Paolo Miccoli; Fulvio Basolo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  A Meta-analysis of Central Lymph Node Metastasis for Predicting Lateral Involvement in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiabin Lan; Wei Sun; Hao Zhang; Wenwu Dong; Zhihong Wang; Ting Zhang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 9.  Update on differentiated thyroid cancer staging.

Authors:  Denise P Momesso; R Michael Tuttle
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.741

10.  Association between BRAF V600E mutation and mortality in patients with papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Mingzhao Xing; Ali S Alzahrani; Kathryn A Carson; David Viola; Rossella Elisei; Bela Bendlova; Linwah Yip; Caterina Mian; Federica Vianello; R Michael Tuttle; Eyal Robenshtok; James A Fagin; Efisio Puxeddu; Laura Fugazzola; Agnieszka Czarniecka; Barbara Jarzab; Christine J O'Neill; Mark S Sywak; Alfred K Lam; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre; Pilar Santisteban; Hirotaka Nakayama; Ralph P Tufano; Sara I Pai; Martha A Zeiger; William H Westra; Douglas P Clark; Roderick Clifton-Bligh; David Sidransky; Paul W Ladenson; Vlasta Sykorova
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Construction of Novel Gene Signature-Based Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Combining Random Forest With Artificial Neural Network.

Authors:  Yanze Wu; Hui Chen; Lei Li; Liuping Zhang; Kai Dai; Tong Wen; Jingtian Peng; Xiaoping Peng; Zeqi Zheng; Ting Jiang; Wenjun Xiong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Deep learning methods may not outperform other machine learning methods on analyzing genomic studies.

Authors:  Yao Dong; Shaoze Zhou; Li Xing; Yumeng Chen; Ziyu Ren; Yongfeng Dong; Xuekui Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.772

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.