Matthew Halliday1, Deanna Mill1, Jacinta Johnson2, Kenneth Lee3. 1. Division of Pharmacy, School of Allied Health. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, M315, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. 2. Division of Pharmacy, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South, Australia; SA Pharmacy, SA Health, Adelaide, Australia. 3. Division of Pharmacy, School of Allied Health. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, M315, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. Electronic address: Kenneth.Lee@uwa.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Focus group discussions typically involve face-to-face facilitation. There is growing interest in utilising digital technologies to facilitate aspects of focus group research. To date, no study in the pharmacy profession has comprehensively described and evaluated a fully virtual process to focus group research, from recruitment to reimbursement. OBJECTIVE(S): This study aims to describe an entirely online approach to: recruiting for and facilitating virtual focus group discussions, and reimbursement of participants within the pharmacy profession. Specifically, our objectives were to identify 1) the dropout rate, 2) the geographic diversity of focus group participants, and 3) the occurrence of technological issues. METHOD: Traditional face-to-face focus group recruitment and facilitation methods were adapted, pre-tested, and conducted using online platforms for advertising, participant expressions of interest, participant consent, focus group facilitation, and participant reimbursement. Populations of interest included community pharmacists, specialty practice pharmacists, hospital pharmacists, and pharmacy assistants and technicians across Australia. RESULTS: Of the 153 potential participants who either completed an expression of interest to participate (135/153) or agreed to participate after direct contact (18/153), 59 confirmed that they would attend the focus group discussion (39%); 49 of the 59 (dropout rate: 17%) participated in one of eight focus groups. Collectively, there was representation from all States and Territories in Australia, as well as representation in each of the populations of interest. Three of 49 participants (6%) experienced minor technological issues during the process; no participant encountered major technological issues that precluded successful participation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that an entirely online approach to focus group methodology is possible, has the potential to recruit demographically and geographically-diverse participants with low dropout rates, and can be successfully conducted with minimal technological issues. Despite the recent COVID-19 pandemic making physical focus group facilitation untenable, this fully-online approach enables research to be completed uninterrupted.
BACKGROUND: Focus group discussions typically involve face-to-face facilitation. There is growing interest in utilising digital technologies to facilitate aspects of focus group research. To date, no study in the pharmacy profession has comprehensively described and evaluated a fully virtual process to focus group research, from recruitment to reimbursement. OBJECTIVE(S): This study aims to describe an entirely online approach to: recruiting for and facilitating virtual focus group discussions, and reimbursement of participants within the pharmacy profession. Specifically, our objectives were to identify 1) the dropout rate, 2) the geographic diversity of focus group participants, and 3) the occurrence of technological issues. METHOD: Traditional face-to-face focus group recruitment and facilitation methods were adapted, pre-tested, and conducted using online platforms for advertising, participant expressions of interest, participant consent, focus group facilitation, and participant reimbursement. Populations of interest included community pharmacists, specialty practice pharmacists, hospital pharmacists, and pharmacy assistants and technicians across Australia. RESULTS: Of the 153 potential participants who either completed an expression of interest to participate (135/153) or agreed to participate after direct contact (18/153), 59 confirmed that they would attend the focus group discussion (39%); 49 of the 59 (dropout rate: 17%) participated in one of eight focus groups. Collectively, there was representation from all States and Territories in Australia, as well as representation in each of the populations of interest. Three of 49 participants (6%) experienced minor technological issues during the process; no participant encountered major technological issues that precluded successful participation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that an entirely online approach to focus group methodology is possible, has the potential to recruit demographically and geographically-diverse participants with low dropout rates, and can be successfully conducted with minimal technological issues. Despite the recent COVID-19 pandemic making physical focus group facilitation untenable, this fully-online approach enables research to be completed uninterrupted.
Authors: Carolin C Hoeflich; Anna Wang; Ayodeji Otufowora; Linda B Cottler; Catherine W Striley Journal: Curr Opin Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.787
Authors: Carl A Maida; Marvin Marcus; Di Xiong; Paula Ortega-Verdugo; Elizabeth Agredano; Yilan Huang; Linyu Zhou; Steve Y Lee; Jie Shen; Ron D Hays; James J Crall; Honghu Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Lotte Timmermans; Ine Huybrechts; Peter Decat; Veerle Foulon; Ann Van Hecke; Mieke Vermandere; Birgitte Schoenmakers Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-03-25
Authors: Yanaina Chavez-Ugalde; Zoi Toumpakari; Martin White; Frank De Vocht; Russell Jago Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-03-27 Impact factor: 4.615