Literature DB >> 33653330

Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal dromedary camel tarsus.

Zakriya Ali Al Mohamad1, Usama Hagag2, Mohamed Gomaa Tawfiek3, Ayman El Nahas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most versatile and informative imaging modality for the diagnosis of locomotor injuries in many animal species; however, veterinary literature describing the MRI of the dromedary camel tarsus is lacking. Our purpose was to describe and compare the MRI images of twelve cadaveric tarsi, examined in a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner, with their corresponding anatomical gross sections. Turbo spin-echo (TSE) T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), proton density-weighted (PD), and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences were obtained in 3 planes. Tarsi were sectioned in sagittal, dorsal, and transverse planes. MRI images from different sequences and planes were described and compared with the anatomical sections.
RESULTS: The soft and osseous tissues of the dromedary camel tarsus could be clearly defined on MRI images and corresponded extensively with the gross anatomic sections. The obtained MRI images enabled comprehensive assessment of the anatomic relationships among the osseous and soft tissues of the camel tarsus. Several structure were evaluated that cannot be imaged using radiography or ultrasonography, including the transverse inter-tarsal ligaments, the talocalcaneal ligament, the short dorsal ligament, branches of the short medial and lateral collateral ligaments and the tarsometatarsal ligaments. Specific anatomical features regarding the dromedary camel tarsus were identified, including the fused second and third tarsal bone, an additional bundle of the short medial collateral ligament connecting the talus and metatarsus and the medial and lateral limbs of the long plantar ligament.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI images provided a thorough evaluation of the normal dromedary camel tarsus. Information provided in the current study is expected to serve as a basis for interpretation in clinical situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Camel; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tarsus

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33653330      PMCID: PMC7923829          DOI: 10.1186/s12917-021-02811-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Vet Res        ISSN: 1746-6148            Impact factor:   2.741


  17 in total

1.  Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine tarsus: normal anatomy.

Authors:  M A Blaik; R R Hanson; S A Kincaid; J T Hathcock; J A Hudson; D K Baird
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 2.  Diagnostic imaging of the equine tarsal region using radiography and ultrasonography. Part 1: the soft tissues.

Authors:  Katrien Vanderperren; Els Raes; Michel Hoegaerts; Jimmy H Saunders
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.688

3.  Chemical restraint, anesthesia, and analgesia for camelids.

Authors:  Eric J Abrahamsen
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the tarsal joint at the trot.

Authors:  J L Lanovaz; S Khumsap; H M Clayton; J A Stick; J Brown
Journal:  Equine Vet J Suppl       Date:  2002-09

5.  Correlation of magnetic resonance images with anatomic features of the equine tarsus.

Authors:  Rafael Latorre; Alberto Arencibia; Francisco Gil; Miguel Rivero; Robert W Henry; Gregorio Ramírez; Jose M Váquez
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Computed tomography and cross-sectional anatomy of the normal dromedary camel tarsus (one humped camel).

Authors:  U Hagag; W Brehm; R O Ramadan; A Al Mubarak; A El Nahas; K Gerlach
Journal:  Anat Histol Embryol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 1.114

7.  The arthroscopic and ultrasonographic boundaries of the equine femorotibial joints.

Authors:  M F Barrett; D D Frisbie; C W McIlwraith; N M Werpy
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Effect of ultrasound beam angle on equine articular cartilage thickness measurement.

Authors:  P Y Barthez; R J Bais; J C M Vernooij
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.363

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot: 15 horses.

Authors:  S Dyson; R Murray; M Schramme; M Branch
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and gross anatomy of the canine tarsus.

Authors:  Kirsten J Deruddere; Marjorie E Milne; Kane M Wilson; Sam R Snelling
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.495

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Normal Testes and Epididymis Besides Angiography of Testicular Artery in Dromedary Camel.

Authors:  Ramadan Sary; Karim Khalil; Ramya A Sindi; Ragab H Mohamed; Hassan A Hussein; Refaat A Eid; Haney Samir; Mohammed M Alkahtani; Ayman A Swelum; Ahmed E Ahmed
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.