Literature DB >> 33653297

Short-term outcomes and safety of radiotherapy for immediate breast reconstruction with autologous flap transfer following breast-conserving surgery.

Shu-Ling Zhang1, Jun Song1, Yan-Ru Wang1, Yi-Jia Guo1, Jian-Zhu Zhao1, Li Sun1, Le-Tian Huang1, Jie-Tao Ma2, Cheng-Bo Han3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IABR) after partial mastectomy followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in terms of aesthetics, treatment-related complications, and local control are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of IABR after partial mastectomy with or without breast RT, and thus the impact of radiation on autologous flap transfer.
METHOD: A retrospective cohort study involving consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent IABR after partial mastectomy between July 2011 and December 2017 at Shengjing Hospital was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received RT after IABR. We compared aesthetic outcomes and changes in the flap size over the three-dimensional coordinates at various timepoints (pre-RT, 1, 6, and 12 months post-RT), as well as postoperative complications, survival, and recurrence rates between the two groups.
RESULTS: In total, 84 breast cancer patients were enrolled, with 32 patients in the RT group and 52 in the non-RT group. At a median follow-up time of 33.3 months, no significant difference was found in the rate of regional recurrence between the two groups (3.13% vs. 3.85%, P = 1.00), and no local recurrences occurred in either group. At the timepoints pre-RT, 1, and 6 months post-RT (approximately 4, 7, and 12 months after IABR, respectively), 77 (91.7%), 70 (83.3%), and 83 (98.8%) patients, respectively, had achieved very good or good cosmetic outcomes, and only changes in breast skin color at 1 month after RT significantly differed between the RT and non-RT groups, with very good or good cosmetic result rates of 62.5% vs. 96.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant difference in the reduction of flap size was observed at any timepoint between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of postoperative complications including necrosis of the flap, infection, hematoma, or seroma (all P > 0.05). Additionally, no grade 3 or greater RT-associated adverse events occurred during or after RT.
CONCLUSION: RT following IABR provides aesthetically satisfactory results without intolerable adverse complications and may safely be performed in patients who underwent IABR after partial mastectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous flap; Breast cancer; Immediate breast reconstruction; Postoperative radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33653297      PMCID: PMC7923603          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07915-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of local recurrence and distant metastases between breast cancer patients after postmastectomy radiotherapy with and without immediate TRAM flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Chih-Jen Huang; Ming-Feng Hou; Sin-Daw Lin; Hung-Yi Chuang; Ming-Yii Huang; Ou-Yang Fu; Shi-Long Lian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Oncoplastic breast surgery and radiotherapy-Adverse aesthetic outcomes, proposed classification of aesthetic components, and causality attribution.

Authors:  Amit Agrawal
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Autologous fat grafting after breast conserving surgery: Breast imaging changes and patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  A A Juhl; S Redsted; T Engberg Damsgaard
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  The Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Is a Safe and Effective Method of Partial Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander F Mericli; Caroline Szpalski; Mark V Schaverien; Jesse C Selber; David M Adelman; Patrick B Garvey; Mark T Villa; Geoffrey Robb; Donald P Baumann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Postmastectomy radiation therapy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction: integrating perspectives from surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Danielle H Rochlin; Ah-Reum Jeong; Leah Goldberg; Timothy Harris; Kriti Mohan; Stella Seal; Joe Canner; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Latoya E Kuhn; Julie C Lowery; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Saskia W M C Maass; Shaghayegh Bagher; Stefan O P Hofer; Nancy N Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Acute and chronic results of adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy and Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction for breast cancer.

Authors:  Michele Y Halyard; Kathy E McCombs; William W Wong; Edward W Buchel; Barbara A Pockaj; Sujay A Vora; Richard J Gray; Steven E Schild
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique.

Authors:  Albert Losken; Claire S Dugal; Toncred M Styblo; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 10.  Psychosocial Aspects of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Heimes; Kathrin Stewen; Annette Hasenburg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.