Dominik Jens Elias Waibel1,2, Sayedali Shetab Boushehri1,2,3, Carsten Marr4. 1. Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. 2. School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephan, Germany. 3. Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany. 4. Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. carsten.marr@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep learning contributes to uncovering molecular and cellular processes with highly performant algorithms. Convolutional neural networks have become the state-of-the-art tool to provide accurate and fast image data processing. However, published algorithms mostly solve only one specific problem and they typically require a considerable coding effort and machine learning background for their application. RESULTS: We have thus developed InstantDL, a deep learning pipeline for four common image processing tasks: semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, pixel-wise regression and classification. InstantDL enables researchers with a basic computational background to apply debugged and benchmarked state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms to their own data with minimal effort. To make the pipeline robust, we have automated and standardized workflows and extensively tested it in different scenarios. Moreover, it allows assessing the uncertainty of predictions. We have benchmarked InstantDL on seven publicly available datasets achieving competitive performance without any parameter tuning. For customization of the pipeline to specific tasks, all code is easily accessible and well documented. CONCLUSIONS: With InstantDL, we hope to empower biomedical researchers to conduct reproducible image processing with a convenient and easy-to-use pipeline.
BACKGROUND: Deep learning contributes to uncovering molecular and cellular processes with highly performant algorithms. Convolutional neural networks have become the state-of-the-art tool to provide accurate and fast image data processing. However, published algorithms mostly solve only one specific problem and they typically require a considerable coding effort and machine learning background for their application. RESULTS: We have thus developed InstantDL, a deep learning pipeline for four common image processing tasks: semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, pixel-wise regression and classification. InstantDL enables researchers with a basic computational background to apply debugged and benchmarked state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms to their own data with minimal effort. To make the pipeline robust, we have automated and standardized workflows and extensively tested it in different scenarios. Moreover, it allows assessing the uncertainty of predictions. We have benchmarked InstantDL on seven publicly available datasets achieving competitive performance without any parameter tuning. For customization of the pipeline to specific tasks, all code is easily accessible and well documented. CONCLUSIONS: With InstantDL, we hope to empower biomedical researchers to conduct reproducible image processing with a convenient and easy-to-use pipeline.
Authors: Eric M Christiansen; Samuel J Yang; D Michael Ando; Ashkan Javaherian; Gaia Skibinski; Scott Lipnick; Elliot Mount; Alison O'Neil; Kevan Shah; Alicia K Lee; Piyush Goyal; William Fedus; Ryan Poplin; Andre Esteva; Marc Berndl; Lee L Rubin; Philip Nelson; Steven Finkbeiner Journal: Cell Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Philipp Tschandl; Noel Codella; Bengü Nisa Akay; Giuseppe Argenziano; Ralph P Braun; Horacio Cabo; David Gutman; Allan Halpern; Brian Helba; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Aimilios Lallas; Jan Lapins; Caterina Longo; Josep Malvehy; Michael A Marchetti; Ashfaq Marghoob; Scott Menzies; Amanda Oakley; John Paoli; Susana Puig; Christoph Rinner; Cliff Rosendahl; Alon Scope; Christoph Sinz; H Peter Soyer; Luc Thomas; Iris Zalaudek; Harald Kittler Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Juan C Caicedo; Jonathan Roth; Allen Goodman; Tim Becker; Kyle W Karhohs; Matthieu Broisin; Csaba Molnar; Claire McQuin; Shantanu Singh; Fabian J Theis; Anne E Carpenter Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Juan C Caicedo; Allen Goodman; Kyle W Karhohs; Beth A Cimini; Jeanelle Ackerman; Marzieh Haghighi; CherKeng Heng; Tim Becker; Minh Doan; Claire McQuin; Mohammad Rohban; Shantanu Singh; Anne E Carpenter Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Scott Mayer McKinney; Marcin Sieniek; Varun Godbole; Jonathan Godwin; Natasha Antropova; Hutan Ashrafian; Trevor Back; Mary Chesus; Greg S Corrado; Ara Darzi; Mozziyar Etemadi; Florencia Garcia-Vicente; Fiona J Gilbert; Mark Halling-Brown; Demis Hassabis; Sunny Jansen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Christopher J Kelly; Dominic King; Joseph R Ledsam; David Melnick; Hormuz Mostofi; Lily Peng; Joshua Jay Reicher; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Richard Sidebottom; Mustafa Suleyman; Daniel Tse; Kenneth C Young; Jeffrey De Fauw; Shravya Shetty Journal: Nature Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 49.962