Janos Geli1, Massimo Capoccia2, Dirk M Maybauer3, Marc O Maybauer3,4,5,6. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 59562Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Aortic and Cardiac Surgery, 156726Royal Brompton Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany. 4. Department of Anaesthesia, 105551Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom. 5. Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 6. Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Advanced Critical Care, Integris Baptist Medical Centre, Oklahoma City, and Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heparin is the widely used anti-coagulation strategy for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and acquired anti-thrombin (AT) deficiency preclude the use of heparin requiring utilization of an alternative anticoagulant agent. Direct thrombin inhibitors are being proposed as potential alternatives with argatroban as one of the main agents. We aimed to review the evidence with regard to safety and efficacy of argatroban as a potential definitive alternative to heparin in the adult patient population undergoing ECMO support. METHODS: A web-based systematic literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed) and Embase from inception until June 18, 2020. RESULTS: The search identified 13 publications relevant to the target (4 cohort studies and 9 case series). Case reports and case series with less than 3 cases were not included in the qualitative synthesis. The aggregate number of argatroban treated patients on ECMO was n = 307. In the majority of studies argatroban was used as a continuous infusion without loading dose. Starting doses on ECMO varied between 0.05 and 2 μg/kg/min and were titrated to achieve the chosen therapeutic target range. The activated partial thormboplastin time (aPTT) was the anticoagulation parameter used for monitoring purposes in most studies, whereas some utilized the activated clotting time (ACT). Optimal therapeutic targets varied between 43-70 and 60-100 seconds for aPTT and between 150-210 and 180-230 seconds for ACT. Bleeding and thromboembolic complication rates were comparable to patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH). CONCLUSIONS: Argatroban infusion rates and anticoagulation target ranges showed substantial variations. The rational for divergent dosing and monitoring approaches are discussed in this paper. Argatroban appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in patients requiring ECMO. To definitively establish its safety, efficacy and ideal dosing strategy, larger prospective studies on well-defined patient populations are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Heparin is the widely used anti-coagulation strategy for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and acquired anti-thrombin (AT) deficiency preclude the use of heparin requiring utilization of an alternative anticoagulant agent. Direct thrombin inhibitors are being proposed as potential alternatives with argatroban as one of the main agents. We aimed to review the evidence with regard to safety and efficacy of argatroban as a potential definitive alternative to heparin in the adult patient population undergoing ECMO support. METHODS: A web-based systematic literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed) and Embase from inception until June 18, 2020. RESULTS: The search identified 13 publications relevant to the target (4 cohort studies and 9 case series). Case reports and case series with less than 3 cases were not included in the qualitative synthesis. The aggregate number of argatroban treated patients on ECMO was n = 307. In the majority of studies argatroban was used as a continuous infusion without loading dose. Starting doses on ECMO varied between 0.05 and 2 μg/kg/min and were titrated to achieve the chosen therapeutic target range. The activated partial thormboplastin time (aPTT) was the anticoagulation parameter used for monitoring purposes in most studies, whereas some utilized the activated clotting time (ACT). Optimal therapeutic targets varied between 43-70 and 60-100 seconds for aPTT and between 150-210 and 180-230 seconds for ACT. Bleeding and thromboembolic complication rates were comparable to patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH). CONCLUSIONS: Argatroban infusion rates and anticoagulation target ranges showed substantial variations. The rational for divergent dosing and monitoring approaches are discussed in this paper. Argatroban appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in patients requiring ECMO. To definitively establish its safety, efficacy and ideal dosing strategy, larger prospective studies on well-defined patient populations are warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
DTI; ECMO; direct thrombin inhibitor; extra-corporeal life support; heparin
Authors: Michael Fabbro; Prakash A Patel; Reney A Henderson; Daniel Bolliger; Kenichi A Tanaka; Michael A Mazzeffi Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Mirjam Bachler; Lars M Asmis; Jürgen Koscielny; Thomas Lang; Hartmuth Nowak; Patrick Paulus; Jens-Christian Schewe; Christian von Heymann; Dietmar Fries Journal: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 1.061
Authors: René M'Pembele; Sebastian Roth; Aljoscha Metzger; Anthony Nucaro; Alexandra Stroda; Amin Polzin; Markus W Hollmann; Giovanna Lurati Buse; Ragnar Huhn Journal: Thromb J Date: 2022-07-28