Literature DB >> 33652888

Alloplastic Bone Substitutes for Periodontal and Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: Current Status and Prospects.

Shunsuke Fukuba1, Munehiro Okada1, Kohei Nohara1, Takanori Iwata1.   

Abstract

Various bone graft products are commercially available worldwide. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the appropriate bone graft products in different clinical situations. This review is intended to summarize bone graft products, especially alloplastic bone substitutes that are available in multiple countries. It also provides dental clinicians with detailed and accurate information concerning these products. Furthermore, it discusses the prospects of alloplastic bone substitutes based on an analysis of the current market status, as well as a comparison of trends among countries. In this review, we focus on alloplastic bone substitutes approved in the United States, Japan, and Korea for use in periodontal and bone regeneration. According to the Food and Drug Administration database, 87 alloplastic bone graft products have been approved in the United States since 1996. According to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency database, 10 alloplastic bone graft products have been approved in Japan since 2004. According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare database, 36 alloplastic bone graft products have been approved in Korea since 1980. The approved products are mainly hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and biphasic calcium phosphate. The formulations of the products differed among countries. The development of new alloplastic bone products has been remarkable. In the near future, alloplastic bone substitutes with safety and standardized quality may be the first choice instead of autologous bone; they may offer new osteoconductive and osteoinductive products with easier handling form and an adequate resorption rate, which can be used with growth factors and/or cell transplantation. Careful selection of alloplastic bone graft products is necessary to achieve predictable outcomes according to each clinical situation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alloplastic bone substitutes; bone graft materials; guided bone regeneration; peri-implantitis; periodontal regeneration; synthetic graft

Year:  2021        PMID: 33652888      PMCID: PMC7956697          DOI: 10.3390/ma14051096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  78 in total

1.  3D-printed Bioresorbable Scaffold for Periodontal Repair.

Authors:  G Rasperini; S P Pilipchuk; C L Flanagan; C H Park; G Pagni; S J Hollister; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  C M Kelly; R M Wilkins; S Gitelis; C Hartjen; J T Watson; P T Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Wound models for periodontal and bone regeneration: the role of biologic research.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Iain L C Chapple; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 4.  Biomaterials for promoting periodontal regeneration in human intrabony defects: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Dimitris Nikolidakis; George Nikou; Aleksandar Ivanovic; Iain L C Chapple; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

5.  A comparison of three calcium phosphate-based space fillers in sinus elevation: a study in rabbits.

Authors:  France Lambert; Angelique Leonard; Geoffrey Lecloux; Sophie Sourice; Paul Pilet; Eric Rompen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Luca Cordaro; Dieter D Bosshardt; Piermario Palattella; Walter Rao; Giuseppe Serino; Matteo Chiapasco
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Alveolar ridge preservation with the socket-plug technique utilizing an alloplastic putty bone substitute or a particulate xenograft: a histological pilot study.

Authors:  Lanka Mahesh; Narayan Venkataraman; Sagrika Shukla; Hari Prasad; Georgios A Kotsakis
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects: an evidence-based treatment approach.

Authors:  P Cortellini; G M Bowers
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Bone Regeneration Capability of 3D Printed Ceramic Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang; Seok-Jin Hong; Hyo-Geun Choi; Sun-Ju Byeon; Ho-Kyung Lim; Sung-Min Chung; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  3D-Printed Ceramic Bone Scaffolds with Variable Pore Architectures.

Authors:  Ho-Kyung Lim; Seok-Jin Hong; Sun-Ju Byeon; Sung-Min Chung; Sung-Woon On; Byoung-Eun Yang; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Polyphenol-Enriched Composite Bone Regeneration Materials: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Kamila Checinska; Maciej Checinski; Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska; Maciej Sikora; Dariusz Chlubek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Frequency of Bone Augmentation Materials Use in a General Dental Practice.

Authors:  Ruxandra Elena Caracaş; Horia Octavian Manolea; Ioana Mitruţ; Andrei Mihai Caracaş; Alex Ioan Sălan; Maria Alexandra Drăghici; Ana Maria Rîcă
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2021-09-30

3.  Modified Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of a Bioglass-Based Composite for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Marcos José da Silva; Wellington Alves; Carlos Frederico de Oliveira Graeff; Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-12-03

4.  The Effect of Low-Temperature Thermal Processing on Bovine Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes, toward Bone Cell Interaction and Differentiation.

Authors:  Gemma Claire Porter; Dina Abdelmoneim; Kai Chun Li; Warwick John Duncan; Dawn Elizabeth Coates
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Polymer-Based Bone Substitutes in Periodontal Infrabony Defects: A Systematic Evaluation of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Florin Onisor; Simion Bran; Ileana Mitre; Alexandru Mester; Andrada Voina-Tonea; Gabriel Armencea; Mihaela Baciut
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Effects of collagen membranes and bone substitute differ in periodontal ligament cell microtissues and monolayers.

Authors:  Klara Janjić; Hermann Agis; Andreas Moritz; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Oleh Andrukhov
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 4.494

Review 7.  Periodontal Bifunctional Biomaterials: Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Qiuxia Huang; Xin Huang; Lisha Gu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.