Literature DB >> 33652864

Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in Patients with Stroke.

Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín1, Mª José Crisostomo2, Mª Piedad Sánchez-Martínez3, Francesc Medina-Mirapeix3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the responsiveness of the 5STS test among stroke patients and to estimate the MCIDs (minimal clinically important differences) for different severity levels of community ambulation and stages of recovery. The 5STS and comparator instruments (gait speed and Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC)) were evaluated at baseline. These measures were repeated at 4 (Stage 1) and 8 weeks (Stage 2), together with the Global Rating of Change (GROC). The MCIDs were calculated with two anchor-based methods using the GROC as the external criterion. Responsiveness to change for the 5STS was estimated analyzing the correlation with changes in the two comparator instruments and their capacity to discriminate improvement. For the 5STS test, while the MCIDs of the limited community ambulators were similar in the two stages (around 3 s), those of the household ambulators decreased from 1.9 s to 0.72 s. Spearman's rho coefficients showed an acceptable correlation between changes in 5STS and changes for both the FAC and gait speed changes in both stages of recovery. Our study revealed that the 5STS is responsive to functional changes in patients with stroke and that their degree of severity and stage of recovery influence the MCID values of the 5STS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5STS; FAC; MCID; gait speed; responsiveness; severity level; stages; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33652864      PMCID: PMC7967692          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  29 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Steven D Glassman; David W Polly; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; E M Simonsick; L Ferrucci; R J Glynn; L F Berkman; D G Blazer; P A Scherr; R B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-03

3.  Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults.

Authors:  Subashan Perera; Samir H Mody; Richard C Woodman; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

Authors:  Raymond W J G Ostelo; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Sit-and-reach test can predict mobility of patients recovering from acute stroke.

Authors:  Yuk Lan Tsang; Margaret Kit Mak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Dirk L Knol; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Lex M Bouter; Henrica Cw de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Five times sit-to-stand following stroke: Relationship with strength and balance.

Authors:  Benjamin F Mentiplay; Ross A Clark; Kelly J Bower; Gavin Williams; Yong-Hao Pua
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Low gait speed is associated with low physical activity and high sedentary time following stroke.

Authors:  Natalie A Fini; Julie Bernhardt; Anne E Holland
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Tensiomyographical responsiveness to peripheral fatigue in quadriceps femoris.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín; Francesc Medina-Mirapeix; José Casaña-Granell; José A García-Vidal; Carmen Lillo-Navarro; Josep C Benítez-Martínez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Responsiveness of the ten-metre walk test, Step Test and Motor Assessment Scale in inpatient care after stroke.

Authors:  Katharine Scrivener; Karl Schurr; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.