Literature DB >> 33652631

A Comparison Study of the Caecum Microbial Profiles, Productivity and Production Quality of Broiler Chickens Fed Supplements Based on Medium Chain Fatty and Organic Acids.

Agila Dauksiene1,2, Modestas Ruzauskas2,3, Romas Gruzauskas4, Paulina Zavistanaviciute1,5, Vytaute Starkute1,5, Vita Lele1,5, Dovile Klupsaite1, Jolita Klementaviciute1, Elena Bartkiene1,5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of medium chain fatty acids (MCFAs) and organic acids (OAs) supplements on the caecum microbial profiles, productivity and production quality characteristics of broiler chickens (BCs). BC (900 chicks) were attributed to three groups: (i) control; (ii) MCFAs group (BCs fed with feed supplemented with MCFAs); (iii) OAs group (BCs fed with feed supplemented with OAs). Broilers were slaughtered at the end of the trial (42 days old), and the caecum microbial profiles, productivity and production quality characteristics were analysed. Supplementation with OAs resulted in a more appropriate environment in the caecum for beneficial microorganisms than with a diet supplemented with MCFAs. This was supported by data on the presence of higher amounts and an increased species variety of probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) in the caecum of birds. The above-mentioned changes of the caecum microbiota led to significantly higher villus height (p = 0.003) of the OAs broiler group and significantly lower crypt depth (p = 0.037). Notwithstanding the significant increase of acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric, and valeric acids that were established in caecum samples from the MCFAs group, better parameters of broiler production performance (higher body weight and lower mortality) and carcass traits (higher both thigh and shin muscles with skin and bone weight; both shin muscles without skin and bone weight; abdominal fat yield) were found in the OAs-treated group. For chemical, physical and technological characteristics of breast meat samples, increased yellowness and water holding capacity by 14.7% and 2.3%, respectively, were found in MCFAs group samples. A more appropriate environment in the caecum for beneficial microorganisms could be obtained when BCs were fed with OAs supplement, comparing to MCFAs, and these positive changes were associated with higher efficiency of poultry production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caecum microbial profiles; microbiome; poultry; production quality; productivity characteristics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33652631      PMCID: PMC7996795          DOI: 10.3390/ani11030610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  61 in total

Review 1.  Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Habib Ur Rehman; Wilfried Vahjen; Wageha A Awad; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Bacteroides barnesiae sp. nov., Bacteroides salanitronis sp. nov. and Bacteroides gallinarum sp. nov., isolated from chicken caecum.

Authors:  Pham Thi Ngoc Lan; Mitsuo Sakamoto; Shinji Sakata; Yoshimi Benno
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Immunomodulation in gut-associated lymphoid tissue of neonatal chicks by immunobiotic diets.

Authors:  K Sato; K Takahashi; M Tohno; Y Miura; T Kamada; S Ikegami; H Kitazawa
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effect of enzyme supplementation and acidification of diets on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broiler chicks.

Authors:  T Ao; A H Cantor; A J Pescatore; M J Ford; J L Pierce; K A Dawson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Growth requirements and fermentation products of Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. nov., comb. nov.

Authors:  Sylvia H Duncan; Georgina L Hold; Hermie J M Harmsen; Colin S Stewart; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Butyrate enhances disease resistance of chickens by inducing antimicrobial host defense peptide gene expression.

Authors:  Lakshmi T Sunkara; Mallika Achanta; Nicole B Schreiber; Yugendar R Bommineni; Gan Dai; Weiyu Jiang; Susan Lamont; Hyun S Lillehoj; Ali Beker; Robert G Teeter; Guolong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Chicken Caecal Microbiome Modifications Induced by Campylobacter jejuni Colonization and by a Non-Antibiotic Feed Additive.

Authors:  Alexandre Thibodeau; Philippe Fravalo; Étienne Yergeau; Julie Arsenault; Ludovic Lahaye; Ann Letellier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Shaping the Metabolism of Intestinal Bacteroides Population through Diet to Improve Human Health.

Authors:  David Rios-Covian; Nuria Salazar; Miguel Gueimonde; Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The interplay between Campylobacter and Helicobacter species and other gastrointestinal microbiota of commercial broiler chickens.

Authors:  Nadeem O Kaakoush; Nidhi Sodhi; Jeremy W Chenu; Julian M Cox; Stephen M Riordan; Hazel M Mitchell
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.181

10.  Influence of Diet and Postmortem Ageing on Oxidative Stability of Lipids, Myoglobin and Myofibrillar Proteins and Quality Attributes of Gluteus Medius Muscle in Goats.

Authors:  Kazeem Dauda Adeyemi; Rafiat Morolayo Shittu; Azad Behnan Sabow; Mahdi Ebrahimi; Awis Qurni Sazili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Short and Medium Chain Fatty Acids and Their Derivatives as a Natural Strategy in the Control of Necrotic Enteritis and Microbial Homeostasis in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Gomez-Osorio; Veronica Yepes-Medina; Anne Ballou; Manuela Parini; Roselina Angel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-14

2.  In vitro Modeling of Chicken Cecal Microbiota Ecology and Metabolism Using the PolyFermS Platform.

Authors:  Paul Tetteh Asare; Anna Greppi; Alessia Pennacchia; Katharina Brenig; Annelies Geirnaert; Clarissa Schwab; Roger Stephan; Christophe Lacroix
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Feeding Bacillus subtilis ATCC19659 to Broiler Chickens Enhances Growth Performance and Immune Function by Modulating Intestinal Morphology and Cecum Microbiota.

Authors:  Taha M Mohamed; Weizhong Sun; Gifty Z Bumbie; Abdelmotaleb A Elokil; Khaled Abuelezz Fouad Mohammed; Rao Zebin; Ping Hu; Liuting Wu; Zhiru Tang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  An Investigation of the Effect of Water Additives on Broiler Growth and the Caecal Microbiota at Harvest.

Authors:  Genevieve Greene; Leonard Koolman; Paul Whyte; Catherine M Burgess; Helen Lynch; Aidan Coffey; Brigid Lucey; Lisa O'Connor; Declan Bolton
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 5.  Overview of the Use of Probiotics in Poultry Production.

Authors:  Katarzyna Krysiak; Damian Konkol; Mariusz Korczyński
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.