Literature DB >> 33652598

Chitosan-Human Bone Composite Granulates for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Piotr Kowalczyk1,2, Rafał Podgórski1, Michał Wojasiński1, Grzegorz Gut3, Witold Bojar4, Tomasz Ciach1,2.   

Abstract

The search for the perfect bone graft material is an important topic in material science and medicine. Despite human bone being the ideal material, due to its composition, morphology, and familiarity with cells, autografts are widely considered demanding and cause additional stress to the patient because of bone harvesting. However, human bone from tissue banks can be used to prepare materials in eligible form for transplantation. Without proteins and fats, the bone becomes a non-immunogenic matrix for human cells to repopulate in the place of implantation. To repair bone losses, the granulate form of the material is easy to apply and forms an interconnected porous structure. A granulate composed of β-tricalcium phosphate, pulverized human bone, and chitosan-a potent biopolymer applied in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and biotechnology-has been developed. A commercial encapsulator was used to obtain granulate, using chitosan gelation upon pH increase. The granulate has been proven in vitro to be non-cytotoxic, suitable for MG63 cell growth on its surface, and increasing alkaline phosphatase activity, an important biological marker of bone tissue growth. Moreover, the granulate is suitable for thermal sterilization without losing its form-increasing its convenience for application in surgery for guided bone regeneration in case of minor or non-load bearing voids in bone tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allografts; cell scaffolds; chitosan; guided bone regeneration; thermal sterilization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33652598      PMCID: PMC7956611          DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  42 in total

Review 1.  Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes.

Authors:  Christopher G Finkemeier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Preparation and microstructure analysis of chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites.

Authors:  I Yamaguchi; K Tokuchi; H Fukuzaki; Y Koyama; K Takakuda; H Monma; J Tanaka
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-04

3.  Biologically and chemically optimized composites of carbonated apatite and polyglycolide as bone substitution materials.

Authors:  W Linhart; F Peters; W Lehmann; K Schwarz; A F Schilling; M Amling; J M Rueger; M Epple
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-02

4.  Patient specific implants for jawbone reconstruction after tumor resection.

Authors:  Roman Major; Piotr Kowalczyk; Marcin Surmiak; Ilona Łojszczyk; Rafał Podgórski; Paulina Trzaskowska; Tomasz Ciach; Guenter Russmueller; Katarzyna Kasperkiewicz; Łukasz Major; Robert Jabłoński; Jacek Kropiwnicki; Juergen M Lackner
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 5.  Autograft, Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Paul Baldwin; Deborah J Li; Darryl A Auston; Hassan S Mir; Richard S Yoon; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Formation and preclinical evaluation of a new alloplastic injectable bone substitute material.

Authors:  Witold Bojar; Martyna Kucharska; Grzegorz Bubak; Tomasz Ciach; Łukasz Koperski; Zenon Jastrzębski; Beata M Gruber; Jolanta Krzysztoń-Russjan; Jadwiga Marczewska; Elżbieta L Anuszewska; Ewa Drozd; Tomasz Brynk
Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.073

7.  Biocomposite scaffolds for bone regeneration: Role of chitosan and hydroxyapatite within poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate on mechanical properties and in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Sai Zhang; Molamma P Prabhakaran; Xiaohong Qin; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Impact of the uremic milieu on the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Diana Lanza; Alessandra F Perna; Adriana Oliva; Raymond Vanholder; Anneleen Pletinck; Salvatore Guastafierro; Annarita Di Nunzio; Carmela Vigorito; Giovambattista Capasso; Vera Jankowski; Joachim Jankowski; Diego Ingrosso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Polymer-Ceramic Composite Scaffolds: The Effect of Hydroxyapatite and β-tri-Calcium Phosphate.

Authors:  Boyang Huang; Guilherme Caetano; Cian Vyas; Jonny James Blaker; Carl Diver; Paulo Bártolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  New Prospects in Nano Phased Co-substituted Hydroxyapatite Enrolled in Polymeric Nanofiber Mats for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Kareem E Mosaad; Kamel R Shoueir; Ahmed H Saied; Montasser M Dewidar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Suitability of Chitosan Scaffolds with Carbon Nanotubes for Bone Defects Treated with Photobiomodulation.

Authors:  Samantha Ketelyn Silva; Ana Maria Guzzi Plepis; Virginia da Conceição Amaro Martins; Marilia Marta Horn; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Rogerio Leone Buchaim; André Antônio Pelegrine; Vinícius Rodrigues Silva; Mateus Hissashi Matsumoto Kudo; José Francisco Rebello Fernandes; Fabricio Montenegro Nazari; Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Small extracellular vesicles isolation and separation: Current techniques, pending questions and clinical applications.

Authors:  Yuanwang Jia; Li Yu; Tieliang Ma; Wenrong Xu; Hui Qian; Yaoxiang Sun; Hui Shi
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 11.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.