| Literature DB >> 33652525 |
Fan Sun1, Xiu Li1, Yan Wang1, Fan Wang1, Haojie Ge1, Zhiming Pan1, Yaohui Xu2, Yanhong Wang1, Xin'an Jiao1, Xiang Chen3.
Abstract
Pullorum is a chicken-specific systemic disease caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Pullorum (S. Pullorum). This study was carried out to provide basic data for understanding the trends of S. Pullorum. A total of 652 S. Pullorum isolates collected in China during 1962-2019 were examined. Overall, 525 (80.5%) isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic; 280 (42.9%) isolates resisted 3 or more classes of antibiotics and showed an increasing trend until 2015 and then decreased significantly. The most common multidrug-resistant pattern was ampicillin-tetracycline-nalidixic acid (13.6%). After 2008, 6 classes of antibiotic-resistant strains began to appear, and they have been prevalent ever since. In 2014, a strain resistant to 7 antibiotics (ampicillin-cefazolin-streptomycin-tetracycline-sulphonamides-nalidixic acid-nitrofurantoin) was isolated. The highest antimicrobial resistance was observed for nalidixic acid (71.9%), and the lowest was found for cefotaxime, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, fosfomycin, and polymyxin (0%). Our findings monitored the prevalence of the resistance of S. Pullorum during the past half-century in China. Continued surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and the rational use of antimicrobials is necessary and important to control the rapid increase in antimicrobial resistance in S. Pullorum.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Pullorum; antimicrobial susceptibility; chicken; resistance trend
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33652525 PMCID: PMC7936142 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Characteristics of antimicrobial resistance of S. Pullorum isolates in terms of years.
| Antimicrobial agent | Antimicrobial | No. of resistant isolates (%) | Total (%) | Sen's slope estimate | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1962–1979 (n = 63) | 1980–1999 (n = 57) | 2000–2009 (n = 200) | 2010–2014 (n = 243) | 2015–2019 (n = 89) | 652 | Q (95% CI) | |||||
| Penicillins | AMP | 0 | 9 (15.8) | 22 (11.0) | 116 (47.7) | 35 (39.3) | 182 (27.9) | <0.001 | 10.93 (10.39 to 11.46) | 128 | 512 |
| Cephems | CFZ | 0 | 1 (1.8) | 8 (4.0) | 35 (14.4) | 11 (12.4) | 55 (8.4) | <0.001 | 3.72 (3.58 to 3.86) | 2 | 4 |
| CTX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0.25 | 1 | |
| Carbapenems | MEM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0.03 | 0.0625 |
| Monobactams | ATM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.1) | 1 (0.2) | <0.001 | 0.24 (0.22 to 0.26) | 0.25 | 4 |
| Aminoglycosides | AMK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0.5 | 1 |
| GEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0.25 | 1 | |
| STR | 3 (4.8) | 8 (14.0) | 6 (3.0) | 11 (4.5) | 0 | 28 (4.3) | <0.001 | −2.01 (−2.23 to −1.79) | 8 | 16 | |
| Tetracyclines | TET | 4 (6.3) | 10 (17.5) | 81 (40.5) | 128 (52.7) | 28 (31.5) | 251 (38.5) | <0.001 | 7.76 (7.07 to 8.45) | 4 | 256 |
| Sulphonamides | SXT | 0 | 3 (5.3) | 77 (38.5) | 111 (45.7) | 18 (20.2) | 209 (32.1) | <0.001 | 7.13 (6.28 to 7.98) | 2/38 | 64/1216 |
| Quinolones and fluoroquinolone | NAL | 2 (3.2) | 1 (1.8) | 155 (77.5) | 239 (98.3) | 72 (80.9) | 469 (71.9) | <0.001 | 24.11 (22.84 to 25.37) | 256 | >512 |
| CIP | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 2 (0.3) | <0.001 | 0.03 (0.01 to 0.04) | 0.25 | 0.5 | |
| Amyl alcohols | CHL | 1 (1.6) | 2 (3.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 0 | 4 (0.6) | <0.001 | −0.67 (−0.72 to −0.62) | 4 | 4 |
| FFC | 1 (1.6) | 2 (3.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (0.5) | <0.001 | −0.66 (−0.72 to −0.60) | 4 | 4 | |
| Nitrofurans | NIT | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.41) | 0 | 2 (0.3) | <0.001 | 0.03 (0.01 to 0.04) | 32 | 64 |
| Quinoxaline | OLA | 0 | 5 (8.8) | 25 (12.5) | 4 (1.6) | 0 | 4 (0.6) | <0.001 | −1.00 (−1.30 to −0.71) | 16 | 64 |
| Lipopeptides | CL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 4 | 128 |
| Fosfomycin | FOS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0.5 | 1 |
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; ATM, aztreonam; AMK, amikacin; CFZ, cefazolin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CL, polymyxin; CTX, cefotaxime; FFC, florfenicol; FOS, fosfomycin; GEN, gentamicin; MEM, meropenem; NAL, nalidixic acid; NIT, nitrofurantoin; OLA, olaquindox; STR, streptomycin; SXT, sulphonamides; TET, tetracycline; Q, magnitude of annual percentage increase or decrease.
Figure 1Antimicrobial resistance rate among S. Pullorum isolates collected from chickens in China during 1962–2019. Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; AMK, amikacin; ATM, aztreonam; CFZ, cefazolin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CL, polymyxin; CTX, cefotaxime; FFC, florfenicol; FOS, fosfomycin; GEN, gentamicin; MEM, meropenem; NAL, nalidixic acid; NIT, nitrofurantoin; OLA, olaquindox; STR, streptomycin; SXT, sulphonamides; TET, tetracycline.
Figure 2Multidrug resistance of S. Pullorum isolates collected from chickens in China between 1962 and 2019. Numbers “0” to “7” and the corresponding shadings indicate that isolates are resistant to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 antimicrobial agents, respectively.
Multidrug-resistant patterns of 652 S.Pullorum isolates collected from chickens in China from 1962 to 2019.
| Year | No. of resistant drugs | Multidrug-resistant pattern | No. of isolates | Resistant rates (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960–1979 (n = 63) | 3 | STR–TET–NAL | 1 | 1.6 |
| 4 | STR–TET–NAL–OLA | 1 | 1.6 | |
| 1980–1999 (n = 57) | 3 | AMP–STR–TET | 4 | 7.0 |
| AMP–TET–OLA | 1 | 1.8 | ||
| TET–CHL–FFC | 1 | 1.8 | ||
| 4 | AMP–STR–TET–NIT | 2 | 3.5 | |
| 5 | AMP–STR–NAL–CHL–FFC | 1 | 1.8 | |
| 2000–2009 (n = 200) | 3 | TET–SXT–NAL | 1 | 0.5 |
| SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.5 | ||
| TET–SXT–OLA | 1 | 0.5 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–SXT | 2 | 1.0 | ||
| AMP–TET–SXT | 4 | 2.0 | ||
| 4 | TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.5 | |
| 5 | AMP–TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 2 | 1.0 | |
| 6 | AMP–STR–TET–SXT–CHL–NIT | 1 | 0.5 | |
| 2010–2014 (n = 243) | 3 | TET–SXT–NAL | 29 | 11.9 |
| AMP–CFZ–NAL | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–TET | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–TET–NAL | 18 | 7.4 | ||
| AMP–SXT–NAL | 16 | 6.6 | ||
| AMP–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| TET–NAL–OLA | 2 | 0.8 | ||
| STR–SXT–NAL | 4 | 1.6 | ||
| SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| STR–TET–NAL | 2 | 0.8 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–NAL | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| 4 | AMP–CFZ–TET–NAL | 18 | 7.4 | |
| AMP–TET–SXT–NAL | 8 | 3.3 | ||
| AMP–TET–NAL–OLA | 2 | 0.8 | ||
| AMP–SXT–NAL–OLA | 5 | 2.1 | ||
| AMP–TET–SXT–NAL | 9 | 3.7 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–SXT–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–SXT–NAL | 2 | 0.8 | ||
| STR–TET–SXT–NAL | 5 | 2.1 | ||
| TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 3 | 1.6 | ||
| ATM–TET–SXT–NAL | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| 5 | AMP–CFZ–TET–SXT–NAL | 3 | 1.2 | |
| AMP–CFZ–TET–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–TET-–SXT–NAL–NIT | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| STR–TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 2 | 0.8 | ||
| AMP–STR–TET–SXT–NAL | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–TET–SXT–NAL | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| 6 | AMP–CFZ–TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 2 | 0.8 | |
| AMP–STR–TET–SXT–NAL–NIT | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| AMP–STR–SXT–NAL–NIT–OLA | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| 7 | AMP–CFZ–STR–TET–SXT–NAL–NIT | 1 | 0.4 | |
| 2015–2019 (n = 89) | 3 | TET–SXT–NAL | 6 | 9.1 |
| AMP–CFZ–NAL | 1 | 1.1 | ||
| AMP–TET–NAL | 9 | 13.6 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–NAL | 2 | 2.2 | ||
| SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 1.5 | ||
| 4 | AMP–CFZ–SXT–NAL | 1 | 1.5 | |
| AMP–ATM–NAL–OLA | 1 | 1.5 | ||
| AMP–SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 1.5 | ||
| AMP–CFZ–TET–NAL | 2 | 2.2 | ||
| CFZ–TET–SXT–OLA | 1 | 1.5 | ||
| TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 3 | 3.4 | ||
| 5 | AMP–CFZ–SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 1.5 | |
| AMP–CFZ–TET–SXT–NAL | 2 | 2.2 | ||
| 6 | AMP–CFZ–TET–SXT–NAL–OLA | 1 | 1.5 | |
| Total | 62 |
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; ATM, aztreonam; CFZ, cefazolin; CHL, chloramphenicol; FFC, florfenicol; NAL, nalidixic acid; NIT, nitrofurantoin; OLA, olaquindox; STR, streptomycin; SXT, sulphonamides; TET, tetracycline.