| Literature DB >> 33652511 |
Abstract
Chronic shoulder pain not relieved by either conservative or surgical management is referred to as chronic refractory shoulder pain. This is a retrospective case series where chronic refractory shoulder pain patients were treated either with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) or with pulsed radiofrequency (p-RF) therapy to the suprascapular nerve. Both patients receiving PNS reported 100% pain relief for the first month. At the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, one patient continued to experience 100% relief while the other reported 90% relief. One patient undergoing p-RF experienced about 90% pain relief at both 1- and 3-month intervals and 0% relief at the 6-month interval. The other patient with p-RF experienced 33% relief at 1-month and 0% relief thereafter. No patient reported any complications. The results of previous randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of p-RF administered to the suprascapular nerve were mixed, and there is a lack of published studies on PNS effects. Neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve can be effective for chronic refractory shoulder pain patients. Larger scale randomized controlled trials comparing PNS and p-RF are needed to better understand their respective therapeutic capacity.Entities:
Keywords: Neuromodulation therapy; Peripheral nerve stimulation; Pulsed radiofrequency treatment; Suprascapular Nerve; Shoulder pain
Year: 2021 PMID: 33652511 PMCID: PMC7943385 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2021.00038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Shoulder Elb ISSN: 1226-9344
The process of selecting patients for the retrospective case series
| Inclusion criteria (must qualify every criterion to be included) | Exclusion criteria (will be excluded if meets any criteria) |
|---|---|
| · Patient aged above 18 years | · Patient had neuromodulation of multiple nerves, i.e., both suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve. |
| · Patient was seen by author at the pain clinic. | · Patient had at least one missing Numeric Pain Score and/or a self-reported functional assessment score for the post procedural follow-up visits. |
| · Patient was experiencing shoulder pain for more than 6 months. | |
| · Patient’s shoulder pain didn’t improve with conservative management. | |
| · Patient’s shoulder pain didn’t improve with surgical interventions or patient wasn’t considered a surgical candidate. | |
| · Patients had >50% temporary pain relief with ultrasound guided diagnostic suprascapular nerve blocks prior to their neuromodulation procedures. | |
| · Patient was treated with either pulsed radiofrequency therapy or peripheral nerve stimulation implant of suprascapular nerve by author. | |
| · Patient had followed up visits with author post neuromodulation procedure at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals. |
Clinical summary of all cases
| Variable | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 65 | 45 | 52 | 40 |
| History of shoulder pain (yr) | 5 | 2 | 9 | 20 |
| Diagnosis | Rotator cuff tear and degenerative joint disease | Rotator cuff tear with acromioclavicular joint hypertrophy | Adhesive capsulitis | Subacromial bursitis |
| Baseline self-reported pain NRS | 7 | 9 | 10 | 6 |
| Type of neuromodulation modality | Peripheral nerve stimulation | Pulsed radiofrequency | Peripheral nerve stimulation | Pulsed radiofrequency |
| One-Month self-reported pain NRS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| One-Month self-reported functional improvement from baseline | 80% Improvement | 60% Improvement | 75% Improvement | 20% Improvement |
| Three-Month self-reported pain NRS | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Three-Month self-reported functional improvement from baseline | 70% Improvement | 25% Improvement | 70% Improvement | 0% Improvement |
| Six-Month self-reported pain NRS | 0 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| Six-Month self-reported functional improvement from baseline | 70% Improvement | 0% Improvement | 60% Improvement | 0% Improvement |
NRS: numeric rating scale.
Summary of published randomized controlled trials on p-RF therapy of suprascapular nerve
| First author (year of publication) | Group | Follow-up | Outcome measure | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eyigor (2010) [ | a. Pulsed radiofrequency (p-RF), n=25 | 12 wk | VAS, ROM, SPADI, short-form 36, Beck depression scale questionnaires | p-RF group had significant improvement in VAS at rest at weeks 1 and 4, VAS at movement at week 1, and VAS at night at weeks 1, 4, and 12. |
| b. Intra-articular | p-RF group had significant improvement in SPADI at weeks 1,4, and 12. | |||
| corticosteroid, n=25 | p-RF group had significant improvement in active and passive abduction at weeks 1 and 4. | |||
| Korkmaz (2010) [ | a. p-RF, n=20 | 12 wk | VAS, ROM, SPADI, short-form 36 | p-RF group had significant improvement in SPADI at week 1. |
| b. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation | ||||
| n=20 | ||||
| Gofeld (2013) [ | a. p-RF, n=12 | 6 mo | NRS, LSI, SPADI, CMS | No significant difference between both groups for NRS, SPADI, and CMS |
| b. Nerve block with lidocaine, n=10 | p-RF group had significant improvement in LSI at months 1 and 3. | |||
| Wu (2014) [ | a. p-RF+12-week PT, n=21 | 12 wk | VAS, ROM, SPADI | p-RF group had significant improvement in VAS score, SPADI score, and passive ROM at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. |
| b. 12-week PT, n=21 | ||||
| Ökmen (2017) [ | a. p-RF, n=30 | 6 mo | VAS, SPADI, Nottingham | No significant difference between both groups for any outcome measure |
| b. Photobiomodulation therapy, n=29 | Health Profile score | |||
| Alanbay (2020) [ | a. p-RF, n=15 | 3 mo | VAS, ROM, GAS during upper-body dressing | p-RF group had significant improvement in VAS score and ROM at months 1 and 3. |
| b. Nerve block with lidocaine, n=15 | p-RF group had significant improvement in GAS at month 3. | |||
p-RF: pulsed radiofrequency, VAS: visual analog scale, ROM: range of motion, SPADI: Shoulder Pain Disability index score, NRS: numeric rating scale, LSI: Likert scale index, CMS: Constant-Murley Score, PT: physical therapy, GAS: Goal Attainment Scale.
Summary of published clinical reports and studies on peripheral nerve implant of suprascapular nerve
| First author (year of publication) | Type of study, number of participants | Follow-up | Outcome measure | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elahi (2014) [ | Case report, 1 | 3 mo | Pain score, range of motion | Patient had no pain at rest and had excellent range of motion. |
| Bouche (2017) [ | Retrospective case series, 9 patients with suprascapular implant | Mean, 33.6 mo; median, 27 mo | Quantitative improvement in pain | Mean pain improvement was 70%. At last follow-up, 6 patients had >50% pain improvement. |
| Kurt (2016) [ | Case report, 1 | 9 mo | Pain score, requirement of pain medications | Patient had no pain and had no requirement to take pain medications. |
| Oswald (2019) [ | Prospective case series, 1 patient with suprascapular implant | 3–6 mo | VAS pain score, activity, opioid consumption | Patient had 66.7% improvement in VAS, 80% improvement in activity, and no change in opioid consumption. |
VAS: visual analog scale.