Literature DB >> 33651987

Strand-specific ChIP-seq at DNA breaks distinguishes ssDNA versus dsDNA binding and refutes single-stranded nucleosomes.

Martina Peritore1, Karl-Uwe Reusswig1, Susanne C S Bantele1, Tobias Straub2, Boris Pfander3.   

Abstract

In a first step of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination, DNA ends are resected such that single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhangs are generated. ssDNA is specifically bound by RPA and other factors, which constitutes a ssDNA-domain on damaged chromatin. The molecular organization of this ssDNA and the adjacent dsDNA domain is crucial during DSB signaling and repair. However, data regarding the presence of nucleosomes, the most basic chromatin components, in the ssDNA domain have been contradictory. Here, we use site-specific induction of DSBs and chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by strand-specific sequencing to analyze in vivo binding of key DSB repair and signaling proteins to either the ssDNA or dsDNA domain. In the case of nucleosomes, we show that recently proposed ssDNA nucleosomes are not a major, persistent species, but that nucleosome eviction and DNA end resection are intrinsically coupled. These results support a model of separated dsDNA-nucleosome and ssDNA-RPA domains during DSB repair.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  DNA binding; DNA double-stranded breaks; DNA end resection; histone; homologous recombination; nucleosome; nucleosome remodeller; single-stranded DNA

Year:  2021        PMID: 33651987     DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chaperoning histones at the DNA repair dance.

Authors:  Ujani Chakraborty; Zih-Jie Shen; Jessica Tyler
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 2.  DNA end resection during homologous recombination.

Authors:  Robert Gnügge; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  Communication between chromatin and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Priyanka Verma; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  DNA Double Strand Break Repair and Its Control by Nucleosome Remodeling.

Authors:  Leonhard Andreas Karl; Martina Peritore; Lorenzo Galanti; Boris Pfander
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  The regulation of DNA end resection by chromatin response to DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Bo-Ruei Chen; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model System for Eukaryotic Cell Biology, from Cell Cycle Control to DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Laura Vanderwaeren; Rüveyda Dok; Karin Voordeckers; Sandra Nuyts; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  The chromatin remodeler Chd1 supports MRX and Exo1 functions in resection of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Marco Gnugnoli; Erika Casari; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.917

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.