Literature DB >> 33651195

Is advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma a distinct entity from intestinal subtype gastric cancer? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM Registry.

Felipe Alvarez-Manceñido1, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca2, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas3, Virginia Arrazubi4, Raquel Hernandez5, Juana M Cano6, Ana Custodio7, Carles Pericay Pijaume8, Gema Aguado9, Nieves Martínez Lago10, Manuel Sánchez Cánovas11, Diego Cacho Lavin12, Laura Visa13, Alba Martinez-Torron14, Aranzazu Arias-Martinez15, Flora López16, M Luisa Limón17, Rosario Vidal Tocino18, Ana Fernández Montes19, Maria Alsina20, Paola Pimentel21, Pablo Reguera22, Alfonso Martín Carnicero23, Avinash Ramchandani24, Mónica Granja25, Aitor Azkarate26, Marta Martín Richard27, Olbia Serra28, Carolina Hernández Pérez29, Alicia Hurtado30, Aitziber Gil-Negrete31, Tamara Sauri32, Patricia Morales Del Burgo33, Javier Gallego34.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is generally treated similarly to advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ-AC) and gastric (GAC) adenocarcinomas, although GAC clinical trials rarely include EAC. This work sought to compare clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of advanced EAC with those of GEJ-AC and GAC and examine prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants comprised patients with advanced EAC, intestinal GEJ-AC, and GAC treated with platin and fluoropyrimidine (plus trastuzumab when HER2 status was positive). Overall and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression gauged the prognostic value of the AGAMENON model.
RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, 971 participants from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry were recruited at 35 centers. The sample included 67.3% GAC, 13.3% GEJ-AC, and 19.4% EAC. Pulmonary metastases were most common in EAC and peritoneal metastases in GAC. Median PFS and OS were 7.7 (95% CI 7.3-8.0) and 13.9 months (12.9-14.7). There was no difference in PFS or OS between HER2- and HER2+ tumors from the three locations (p > 0.05). Five covariates were found to be prognostic for the entire sample: ECOG-PS, histological grade, number of metastatic sites, NLR, and HER2+ tumors treated with trastuzumab. In EAC, the same variables were prognostic except for grade. The favorable prognosis for HER2+ cancers treated with trastuzumab was homogenous for all three subgroups (p = 0.351) and, after adjusting for the remaining covariates, no evidence supported primary tumor localization as a prognostic factor (p = 0.331).
CONCLUSION: Our study supports the hypothesis that EAC exhibits clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes comparable to intestinal GEJ-AC and GAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced cancer; Chemotherapy; Erbb; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal junction; Lauren type; Prognosis; Survival; Trastuzumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33651195     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01169-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  3 in total

1.  Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

Authors:  Sena Valcarcel; Javier Gallego; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca; Marc Diez; Eva Martínez de Castro; Raquel Hernandez; Virginia Arrazubi; Ana Custodio; Juana María Cano; Ana Fernández Montes; Ismael Macias; Laura Visa; Aitana Calvo; Rosario Vidal Tocino; Nieves Martínez Lago; María Luisa Limón; Mónica Granja; Mireia Gil; Paola Pimentel; Lola Macia-Rivas; Carolina Hernández Pérez; Montserrat Mangas; Alfonso Martín Carnicero; Paula Cerdà; Lucía Gomez Gonzalez; Francisco Garcia Navalon; Mª Dolores Mediano Rambla; Marta Martin Richard; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

Authors:  J Gallego Plazas; A Arias-Martinez; A Lecumberri; E Martínez de Castro; A Custodio; J M Cano; R Hernandez; A F Montes; I Macias; A Pieras-Lopez; M Diez; L Visa; R V Tocino; N Martínez Lago; M L Limón; M Gil; P Pimentel; M Mangas; M Granja; A M Carnicero; C Hernández Pérez; L G Gonzalez; P Jimenez-Fonseca; A Carmona-Bayonas
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 3.  Relationships among microbiota, gastric cancer, and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yuzhen Li; Xiaona Huang; Desheng Tong; Chenyu Jiang; Xiaodan Zhu; Zhipeng Wei; Tingjie Gong; Chunhui Jin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.