I Seiwerth1, S Schilde2,3, C Wenzel2, T Rahne2, S K Plontke2. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. Ingmar.seiwerth@uk-halle.de. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. 3. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Implantation of the Bonebridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), an active semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system, involves the risk of impression or a lesion in intracranial structures, such as the dura or sigmoid sinus. Therefore, determining the optimal implant position requires careful preoperative radiological planning. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the possibilities for preoperative radiological planning for the Bonebridge implantation and to evaluate their indications and feasibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database for all studies with preoperative planning or implant placement as the primary endpoint or that secondarily mention preoperative planning. RESULTS: Of 558 studies, 49 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In 18 studies, preoperative planning and floating mass transducer (FMT) placement were the primary endpoints, whereas in 31 studies, preoperative planning was described secondarily. CONCLUSION: There are both freely available and commercial tools involving different time commitments for preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning and intraoperative transfer. Preoperative 3D planning can increase the safety of Bonebridge implantation.
BACKGROUND: Implantation of the Bonebridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), an active semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system, involves the risk of impression or a lesion in intracranial structures, such as the dura or sigmoid sinus. Therefore, determining the optimal implant position requires careful preoperative radiological planning. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the possibilities for preoperative radiological planning for the Bonebridge implantation and to evaluate their indications and feasibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database for all studies with preoperative planning or implant placement as the primary endpoint or that secondarily mention preoperative planning. RESULTS: Of 558 studies, 49 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In 18 studies, preoperative planning and floating mass transducer (FMT) placement were the primary endpoints, whereas in 31 studies, preoperative planning was described secondarily. CONCLUSION: There are both freely available and commercial tools involving different time commitments for preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning and intraoperative transfer. Preoperative 3D planning can increase the safety of Bonebridge implantation.
Authors: P Canzi; S Marconi; M Manfrin; M Magnetto; C Carelli; A M Simoncelli; D Fresa; M Beltrame; F Auricchio; M Benazzo Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.124