Cajsa Björndell1,2,3, Åsa Premberg3,4. 1. Närhälsan Brämaregården Health Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden. 2. Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Research and Development Primary Health Care, Research and Development Centre Gothenburg and Södra Bohuslän, Gothenburg, Sweden. 4. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' experiences of video consultation with new patients visiting a publicly owned virtual primary care clinic. DESIGN: In this qualitative study, data were collected from semi-structured individual interviews and analysed by systematic text condensation. SETTING: A publicly owned virtual primary care clinic in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Ten primary care physicians working at the clinic. RESULTS: Connecting with a patient over video could be either straightforward or deficient, depending on communication and the patient's condition. Clinical experience, communication skills, and involving patients throughout the consultation and examination were crucial for assessments over video where patients were guided to perform self-examination. The flexibility of work and the regulated assignment online were positive for the physicians' work situation and wellbeing. Providing video consultation within the same organisation as the patient's regular health centre was considered to facilitate patient care and safety. Video consultation was considered suitable for some diagnoses and for some patients not able to reach a primary healthcare centre, though doubts were expressed about the healthcare and social benefits of this virtual care service. CONCLUSION: For the physicians, video consultation induced changes in the basis for assessment of primary care patients. The limitations on informational exchange demanded an extended form of patient involvement founded upon consultation skills, clinical experience and new skills for virtual examination. Combining virtual care with traditional general practice has the potential to reduce the workload for the individual physician and ensure medical competence in virtual primary care. Video consultation experienced suitable in some situations, but easy access to it expressed problematic in terms of medical prioritisation in healthcare.KEY POINTSVideo consultation is suitable for primary care visits for some patients, but physicians' experiences of this are rarely studied. •Clinical experience and consultation skills are important for video assessment of primary care patients which involves physician-guided patient self-examination.•Video consultation facilitates care in some situations and could benefit from the provider being connected to patient's regular health centre.•Virtual care offers a flexible way of working but challenges healthcare prioritisation from the primary care physician's perspective.
OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' experiences of video consultation with new patients visiting a publicly owned virtual primary care clinic. DESIGN: In this qualitative study, data were collected from semi-structured individual interviews and analysed by systematic text condensation. SETTING: A publicly owned virtual primary care clinic in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Ten primary care physicians working at the clinic. RESULTS: Connecting with a patient over video could be either straightforward or deficient, depending on communication and the patient's condition. Clinical experience, communication skills, and involving patients throughout the consultation and examination were crucial for assessments over video where patients were guided to perform self-examination. The flexibility of work and the regulated assignment online were positive for the physicians' work situation and wellbeing. Providing video consultation within the same organisation as the patient's regular health centre was considered to facilitate patient care and safety. Video consultation was considered suitable for some diagnoses and for some patients not able to reach a primary healthcare centre, though doubts were expressed about the healthcare and social benefits of this virtual care service. CONCLUSION: For the physicians, video consultation induced changes in the basis for assessment of primary care patients. The limitations on informational exchange demanded an extended form of patient involvement founded upon consultation skills, clinical experience and new skills for virtual examination. Combining virtual care with traditional general practice has the potential to reduce the workload for the individual physician and ensure medical competence in virtual primary care. Video consultation experienced suitable in some situations, but easy access to it expressed problematic in terms of medical prioritisation in healthcare.KEY POINTSVideo consultation is suitable for primary care visits for some patients, but physicians' experiences of this are rarely studied. •Clinical experience and consultation skills are important for video assessment of primary care patients which involves physician-guided patient self-examination.•Video consultation facilitates care in some situations and could benefit from the provider being connected to patient's regular health centre.•Virtual care offers a flexible way of working but challenges healthcare prioritisation from the primary care physician's perspective.
Entities:
Keywords:
Primary health care; consultation process; general practise; qualitative research; telemedicine; video consultation; virtual care
Authors: Björn Ekman; Hans Thulesius; Jens Wilkens; Anna Lindgren; Olof Cronberg; Eva Arvidsson Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Rhea E Powell; Jeffrey M Henstenburg; Grace Cooper; Judd E Hollander; Kristin L Rising Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Victoria Hammersley; Eddie Donaghy; Richard Parker; Hannah McNeilly; Helen Atherton; Annemieke Bikker; John Campbell; Brian McKinstry Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jedrek Wosik; Marat Fudim; Blake Cameron; Ziad F Gellad; Alex Cho; Donna Phinney; Simon Curtis; Matthew Roman; Eric G Poon; Jeffrey Ferranti; Jason N Katz; James Tcheng Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Timothy Callaghan; Carly McCord; David Washburn; Kirby Goidel; Cason Schmit; Tasmiah Nuzhath; Abigail Spiegelman; Julia Scobee Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Hanna Glock; Veronica Milos Nymberg; Beata Borgström Bolmsjö; Jonas Holm; Susanna Calling; Moa Wolff; Miriam Pikkemaat Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2021-12-01