Literature DB >> 33650691

Comparative poisson clinical trials of multiple experimental treatments vs a single control using the negative multinomial distribution.

Joseph A Chiarappa1, Donald R Hoover2.   

Abstract

This paper introduces a method which conditions on the number of events that occur in the control group to determine rejection regions and power for comparative Poisson trials with multiple experimental treatment arms that are each compared to one control arm. This leads to the negative multinomial as the statistical distribution used for testing. For one experimental treatment and one control with curtailed sampling, this is equivalent to Gail's (1974) approach. We provide formulas to calculate exact one-sided overall Type I error and pointwise power for tests of treatment superiority and inferiority (vs the control). Tables of trial design parameters for combinations of one-sided overall Type I error = 0.05, 0.01 and pointwise power = 0.90, 0.80 are provided. Curtailment approaches are presented to stop follow-up of experimental treatment arms or to stop the study entirely once the final outcomes for each arm are known.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; comparative Poisson; negative multinomial; treatment inferiority; treatment superiority

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33650691      PMCID: PMC8991471          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  7 in total

1.  Allocation of subjects to test null relative risks smaller than one.

Authors:  D R Hoover; W C Blackwelder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Subject allocation and study curtailment for fixed event comparative Poisson trials.

Authors:  Donald R Hoover
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Unidirectional multiple comparisons of Poisson rates.

Authors:  S Suissa; R Salmi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Curtailed binomial sampling procedures for clinical trials with paired data.

Authors:  N Herrmann; T H Szatrowski
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1985-03

Review 5.  Avoiding bias in trials in which allocation ratio is varied.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Key concepts of clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Craig A Umscheid; David J Margolis; Craig E Grossman
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Establishing a data monitoring committee for clinical trials.

Authors:  Julia Y Lin; Ying Lu
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.