Literature DB >> 33650513

Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of perilunate injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

İlker Çolak1, Güven Bulut1, Halil İbrahim Bekler2, Gültekin Sıtkı Çeçen3, Deniz Gülabi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with perilunate injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
METHODS: Patients who underwent ORIF due to perilunate injuries from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgery was mostly performed using a standard dorsal approach. Each injury was graded as per Mayfield staging. At the final follow-up, pain intensity was evaluated using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Wrist and elbow range of motion, handgrip and pinch strength, Modified Mayo Wrist Scores, and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores were measured. On plain radiographic examination, the scapholunate (SL) angle, SL interval, carpal height, and continuity of Gilula arcs were evaluated. The presence of arthritis was also assessed using the Herzberg classification.
RESULTS: In total, 26 male patients (27 wrists) who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The mean age was 40 years (range: 20-58); the mean follow-up was 45 months (range: 16-96). Most of the injuries were fracture-dislocations (n=20; 71.4%). According to Mayfield staging, 7 wrists were grade 3, and 20 wrists were grade 4. According to Herzberg staging, 11 (40.7%) patients were stage 2a. The mean VAS was 2.3 (range: 0-5) at rest and 3.3 (range: 0-7) during activity. The mean wrist flexion and extension were 50° (range: 21-80°; 73.5% of the unaffected side) and 45.1° (range: 20-74°; 70.9% of the unaffected side), respectively. The mean radial and ulnar deviation were 14.6° (range: 6-25°; 63.6% of the unaffected side) and 22.3° (range: 5-40°; 64.7% of the unaffected side), respectively. Grip and pinch strength were 57.6 kg (range: 15-106; 65.5% of the unaffected side) and 18.6 kg (range: 8-28; 78.2% of the unaffected side), respectively. The mean Mayo score was 63.3 (range: 20-90), and the DASH score was 24.1±25.2. The mean SL angle was 61.6° (range: 40-83). There was 1 wrist with a pathological SL interval, 11 wrists with dorsal intercalated segmental instability, and 3 wrists with fractures of the Gilula arcs. The mean carpal height was within the normal range.
CONCLUSION: In the treatment of perilunate injuries, satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes can be expected from ORIF at mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33650513      PMCID: PMC7932730          DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.19246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  20 in total

1.  Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain.

Authors:  P E Bijur; W Silver; E J Gallagher
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 2.  Perilunate dislocation and perilunate fracture-dislocation.

Authors:  Spencer J Stanbury; John C Elfar
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

Authors:  P L Hudak; P C Amadio; C Bombardier
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Treatment of acute perilunate dislocations: ORIF versus proximal row carpectomy.

Authors:  T Muller; J J Hidalgo Diaz; E Pire; G Prunières; S Facca; P Liverneaux
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgically Managed Perilunate Dislocation: Outcomes After Perilunate Dislocation.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ibrahim Roushdi; Liza Osagie; Sonja Cerovac; Shamim Umarji
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-13

6.  Comparative Outcome Analysis of Arthroscopic-Assisted Versus Open Reduction and Fixation of Trans-scaphoid Perilunate Fracture Dislocations.

Authors:  Won-Taek Oh; Yun-Rak Choi; Ho-Jung Kang; Il-Hyun Koh; Kyung-Han Lim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: a multicenter study.

Authors:  G Herzberg; J J Comtet; R L Linscheid; P C Amadio; W P Cooney; J Stalder
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Carpal dislocations: pathomechanics and progressive perilunar instability.

Authors:  J K Mayfield; R P Johnson; R K Kilcoyne
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Perilunate fracture-dislocations: clinical and radiological results of 21 cases.

Authors:  Thomas Meszaros; Esther Vögelin; Lukas Mathys; Franck Marie Leclère
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Results of Perilunate Dislocations and Perilunate Fracture Dislocations With a Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Elie Krief; Benjamin Appy-Fedida; Vladimir Rotari; Emmanuel David; Patrice Mertl; Catherine Maes-Clavier
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.