| Literature DB >> 33650154 |
Charles Tai-Chieh Wan1,2, Rémy Richard Jacquemond3,4, Yet-Ming Chiang1,5, Kitty Nijmeijer3,4, Fikile R Brushett1,2, Antoni Forner-Cuenca3.
Abstract
Porous carbonaceous electrodes are performance-defining components in redox flow batteries (RFBs), where their properties impact the efficiency, cost, and durability of the system. The overarching challenge is to simultaneously fulfill multiple seemingly contradictory requirements-i.e., high surface area, low pressure drop, and facile mass transport-without sacrificing scalability or manufacturability. Here, non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) is proposed as a versatile method to synthesize tunable porous structures suitable for use as RFB electrodes. The variation of the relative concentration of scaffold-forming polyacrylonitrile to pore-forming poly(vinylpyrrolidone) is demonstrated to result in electrodes with distinct microstructure and porosity. Tomographic microscopy, porosimetry, and spectroscopy are used to characterize the 3D structure and surface chemistry. Flow cell studies with two common redox species (i.e., all-vanadium and Fe2+/3+ ) reveal that the novel electrodes can outperform traditional carbon fiber electrodes. It is posited that the bimodal porous structure, with interconnected large (>50 µm) macrovoids in the through-plane direction and smaller (<5 µm) pores throughout, provides a favorable balance between offsetting traits. Although nascent, the NIPS synthesis approach has the potential to serve as a technology platform for the development of porous electrodes specifically designed to enable electrochemical flow technologies.Entities:
Keywords: energy storage; phase separation; porous electrodes; redox flow batteries
Year: 2021 PMID: 33650154 PMCID: PMC9290313 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202006716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Mater ISSN: 0935-9648 Impact factor: 32.086
Figure 1.Concept for NIPS-fabricated porous electrodes integrated into a RFB. a) RFB powered by phase separated electrodes connected to electric grid and intermittent renewable energy sources. Inset view: SEM top view of SGL29AA (left) and SEM cross section of PSP-2:3 (right). b) Schematic representation of the different steps involved in the production of flat sheet carbonized materials using phase separation. c) Optical photographs of the phase separated materials at different stages of the preparation process. Left: after drying (≈1.1 mm thick), middle: after thermal stabilization (≈1 mm thick), right: after carbonization (≈0.7 mm thick). d) The use of NIPS with easily controllable parameter to create varieties of porous microstructures. Bottom panel right: Illustration of the different classes of microstructures obtained by NIPS.
Figure 2.Microstructural and surface chemistry characterization. a) SEM images of PSP-1:1 (red), PSP-3:4 (blue), and PSP-2:3 (green). b) 3D reconstruction of PSP-2:3 captured by X-ray tomography (top) with cross-sectional views in the XZ, YZ, and XY-planes (bottom). XTMs of all three PSP materials can be found in Figure S5 (Supporting Information). c) Pore size distribution extracted from mercury intrusion porosimetry. Only the microvoids regions (pore diameter < 100 μm) could be resolved, as the macrovoids of the PSP electrodes were not quantifiable owing to the limitations of MIP. d) Raman spectroscopy. e) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Physical parameters extracted from the microstructural and surface chemistry analysis can be found in Tables S1 and S2 (Supporting Information).
Figure 3.In situ single electrolyte performance. a) Schematic of iron chloride single electrolyte setup with a single reservoir. b) Polarization curves at 5 cm s−1 for SGL 29AA, PSP-1:1, PSP-3:4, and PSP-2:3. c) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy at 5 cm s−1 for SGL 29AA, PSP-1:1, PSP-3:4, and PSP-2:3. Solid lines are fitted using the equivalent circuit shown in the inset. d) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for PSP-2:3 at four different flow rates (0.5, 1.5, 5, and 10 cm s−1). Solid lines are fitted using the equivalent circuit shown in the inset. e) Capacitance measurements to determine electrochemically accessible surface area in 2 m HCl supporting electrolyte at a flow rate of 5 cm s−1 and 20 mV s−1 scan rate. A full range of scan rates can be found in Figure S11 (Supporting Information). Pressure drop with water as the fluid using a f) flow-through flow field (FTFF) and g) interdigitated flow field (IDFF) for SGL29AA and PSP materials. Symbols are the data points, whereas lines are the fits using the Darcy–Forchheimer equation; values are summarized in Table S6 (Supporting Information).
Figure 4.Full cell vanadium redox flow battery polarization and impedance. The electrolyte was 1.5 m V in 2.6 m H2SO4 supporting electrolyte. The linear velocity was 10 cm s−1. a) Discharge polarization with power density curves and b) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for SGL 29AA (black circles) and PSP-2:3 (green triangles).