Literature DB >> 33649923

An overview of drive systems and sealing types in stirred bioreactors used in biotechnological processes.

Cedric Schirmer1, Rüdiger W Maschke2, Ralf Pörtner3, Dieter Eibl2.   

Abstract

No matter the scale, stirred tank bioreactors are the most commonly used systems in biotechnological production processes. Single-use and reusable systems are supplied by several manufacturers. The type, size, and number of impellers used in these systems have a significant influence on the characteristics and designs of bioreactors. Depending on the desired application, classic shaft-driven systems, bearing-mounted drives, or stirring elements that levitate freely in the vessel may be employed. In systems with drive shafts, process hygiene requirements also affect the type of seal used. For sensitive processes with high hygienic requirements, magnetic-driven stirring systems, which have been the focus of much research in recent years, are recommended. This review provides the reader with an overview of the most common agitation and seal types implemented in stirred bioreactor systems, highlights their advantages and disadvantages, and explains their possible fields of application. Special attention is paid to the development of magnetically driven agitators, which are widely used in reusable systems and are also becoming more and more important in their single-use counterparts.Key Points• Basic design of the most frequently used bioreactor type: the stirred tank bioreactor• Differences in most common seal types in stirred systems and fields of application• Comprehensive overview of commercially available bioreactor seal types• Increased use of magnetically driven agitation systems in single-use bioreactors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Application trends; Bioreactor agitation; Hygienic requirements; Lip seal; Magnetic coupling; Mechanical sealing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33649923      PMCID: PMC7954712          DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11180-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  29 in total

1.  Enhanced growth of Sf-9 cells to a maximum density of 5.2 x 10(7) cells per mL and production of beta-galactosidase at high cell density by fed batch culture.

Authors:  C B Elias; A Zeiser; C Bédard; A A Kamen
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-05-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Overview of bacterial expression systems for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems.

Authors:  Kay Terpe
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  High cell density fed batch and perfusion processes for stable non-viral expression of secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) using insect cells: comparison to a batch Sf-9-BEV system.

Authors:  Barbara Ann Jardin; Johnny Montes; Stephane Lanthier; Rosa Tran; Cynthia Elias
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Sustainable reduction of bioreactor contamination in an industrial fermentation pilot plant.

Authors:  Beth Junker; Michael Lester; James Leporati; John Schmitt; Michael Kovatch; Stan Borysewicz; Waldemar Maciejak; Anna Seeley; Michelle Hesse; Neal Connors; Thomas Brix; Eric Creveling; Peter Salmon
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae - Combining kinetic modeling and optimization techniques points out avenues to effective process design.

Authors:  Johannes Scheiblauer; Stefan Scheiner; Martin Joksch; Barbara Kavsek
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  A novel fed-batch strategy enhances lipid and astaxanthin productivity without compromising biomass of Chromochloris zofingiensis.

Authors:  Han Sun; Yuanyuan Ren; Yongmin Lao; Xiaojie Li; Feng Chen
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Expansion of 3D human induced pluripotent stem cell aggregates in bioreactors: Bioprocess intensification and scaling-up approaches.

Authors:  Bernardo Abecasis; Tiago Aguiar; Émilie Arnault; Rita Costa; Patricia Gomes-Alves; Anders Aspegren; Margarida Serra; Paula M Alves
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Continuous production of ethanol from hexoses and pentoses using immobilized mixed cultures of Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  Pornkamol Unrean; Friedrich Srienc
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review.

Authors:  Siti Hajar Mohd Azhar; Rahmath Abdulla; Siti Azmah Jambo; Hartinie Marbawi; Jualang Azlan Gansau; Ainol Azifa Mohd Faik; Kenneth Francis Rodrigues
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2017-03-06

10.  E. coli HMS174(DE3) is a sustainable alternative to BL21(DE3).

Authors:  Johanna Hausjell; Julia Weissensteiner; Christian Molitor; Heidi Halbwirth; Oliver Spadiut
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Application of bioreactor technology for cell culture-based viral vaccine production: Present status and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhongbiao Fang; Jingting Lyu; Jianhua Li; Chaonan Li; Yuxuan Zhang; Yikai Guo; Ying Wang; Yanjun Zhang; Keda Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-09

2.  Improved Time Resolved KPI and Strain Characterization of Multiple Hosts in Shake Flasks Using Advanced Online Analytics and Data Science.

Authors:  Rüdiger W Maschke; Barbara Pretzner; Gernot T John; Christoph Herwig; Dieter Eibl
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.