Literature DB >> 33649485

The effects of acarbose therapy on reductions of myocardial infarction and all-cause death in T2DM during 10-year multifactorial interventions (The Beijing Community Diabetes Study 24).

Xue-Lian Zhang1, Shen-Yuan Yuan2, Gang Wan3, Ming-Xia Yuan4, Guang-Ran Yang1, Han-Jing Fu1, Liang-Xiang Zhu1, Jian-Dong Zhang5, Yu-Ling Li6, Da-Yong Gao7, Xue-Li Cui8, Zi-Ming Wang9, Rong-Rong Xie1, Ying-Jun Chen10.   

Abstract

To investigate the potential benefits of acarbose therapy on cardiovascular events (CVD) in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in an urban community over 10-year follow-up. The study population of Beijing Community Diabetes Study (BCDS) were type 2 diabetes (T2DM) living in 21 communities in Beijing. All patients received comprehensive intervention in accordance with the Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of diabetes. Professors in endocrinology from top tier hospitals regularly visited the communities for consultations, which was a feature of this study. A total of 1797 T2DM in BCDS study had complete screening data, including blood glucose, blood pressure, lipid profiles and acarbose continuous therapy. After 10-year follow-up, the risks of CVD outcomes were assessed according to whether patients had received acarbose therapy or not. All patients were followed-up to assess the long-term effects of the multifactorial interventions. At baseline, compared with the acarbose therapy free in T2DM, there was no significant difference in achieving the joint target control in patients with acarbose therapy. From the beginning of 8th year follow-up, the joint target control rate in patients with acarbose therapy was significantly higher than that of acarbose therapy free. During the 10-year follow-up, a total of 446 endpoint events occurred, including all-cause death, cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events. The incidences of myocardial infarction (from the 4th year of follow-up) and all-cause death (from the 2nd year of follow-up) in patients who received acarbose therapy were significantly lower than that of acarbose therapy free respectively. In Cox multivariate analyses, there were significant differences in incidences of myocardial infarction and all-cause death between afore two groups during the 10-year follow-up, and the adjusted HRs were 0.50 and 0.52, respectively. After multifactorial interventions, T2DM with acarbose therapy revealed significant reductions of myocardial infarction and all-cause death. The long-term effects of with acarbose therapy on improving joint target control might be one of the main reasons of myocardial infarction and all-cause death reduction.Trial Registration: ChiCTR-TRC-13003978, ChiCTR-OOC-15006090.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33649485      PMCID: PMC7921127          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84015-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

1.  Effect of acarbose administration on plasma concentrations of zinc and copper in patients with NIDDM.

Authors:  Y M Song; M D Chen; W H Sheu
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Effects of acarbose versus glibenclamide on glycemic excursion and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by metformin: a 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison.

Authors:  Jun-Sing Wang; Shi-Dou Lin; Wen-Jane Lee; Shih-Li Su; I-Te Lee; Shih-Te Tu; Yao-Hsien Tseng; Shih-Yi Lin; Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies.

Authors:  M Hanefeld; M Cagatay; T Petrowitsch; D Neuser; D Petzinna; M Rupp
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Current and future directions of cardiovascular risk prediction.

Authors:  Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Neck circumference as an effective measure for identifying cardio-metabolic syndrome: a comparison with waist circumference.

Authors:  Yuqi Luo; Xiaojing Ma; Yun Shen; Yiting Xu; Qin Xiong; Xueli Zhang; Yunfeng Xiao; Yuqian Bao; Weiping Jia
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Importance of intensive blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes: Mechanisms, treatments and current guidelines.

Authors:  Michel Marre
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  Contribution of postprandial glucose to excess hyperglycaemia in Asian type 2 diabetic patients using continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  J-S Wang; S-T Tu; I-T Lee; S-D Lin; S-Y Lin; S-L Su; W-J Lee; Wayne H-H Sheu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.876

8.  10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rury R Holman; Sanjoy K Paul; M Angelyn Bethel; David R Matthews; H Andrew W Neil
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Post-challenge hyperglycaemia is associated with premature death and macrovascular complications.

Authors:  Q Qiao; J Tuomilehto; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Factors That Influence Pancreatic Beta Cell Function and Insulin Resistance in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Sub-Analysis of the MARCH Trial.

Authors:  Yan Duan; Jia Liu; Yuan Xu; Ning Yang; Wenying Yang; Guang Wang
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.945

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acarbose is again on the stage.

Authors:  Mustafa Altay
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 2.  Molecular inhibition of RAS signalling to target ageing and age-related health.

Authors:  Mihails Laskovs; Linda Partridge; Cathy Slack
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.732

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.