Literature DB >> 33649007

Fertility and pregnancy outcome in gestational trophoblastic disease.

Ulrika Joneborg1, Leonoor Coopmans2, Nienke van Trommel2, Michael Seckl3, Christianne A R Lok2.   

Abstract

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of existing literature and current knowledge on fertility rates and reproductive outcomes after gestational trophoblastic disease. A systematic literature search was performed to retrieve all available studies on fertility rates and reproductive outcomes after hydatidiform mole pregnancy, low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, high- and ultra-high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, and the rare placental site trophoblastic tumor and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor forms of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. The effects of single-agent chemotherapy, multi-agent including high-dose chemotherapy, and immunotherapy on fertility, pregnancy wish, and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated and summarized. After treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, most, but not all, women want to achieve another pregnancy. Age and extent of therapy determine if there is a risk of loss of fertility. Single-agent treatment does not affect fertility and subsequent pregnancy outcome. Miscarriage occurs more often in women who conceive within 6 months of follow-up after chemotherapy. Multi-agent chemotherapy hastens the natural menopause by three years and commonly induces a temporary amenorrhea, but in young women rarely causes permanent ovarian failure or infertility. Subsequent pregnancies have a high chance of ending with live healthy babies. In contrast, high-dose chemotherapy typically induces permanent amenorrhea, and no pregnancies have been reported after high-dose chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Immunotherapy is promising and may give better outcomes than multiple schedules of chemotherapy or even high-dose chemotherapy. The first pregnancy after immunotherapy has recently been described. Data on fertility-sparing treatment in placental site trophoblastic tumor and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor are still scarce, and this option should be offered with caution. In general, patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia may be reassured about their future fertility and pregnancy outcome. Detailed registration of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia is still indispensable to obtain more complete data to better inform patients in the future. © IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gestational trophoblastic disease; hydatidiform mole; neoplastic; placental site; pregnancy complications; trophoblastic neoplasms; trophoblastic tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33649007     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  3 in total

1.  Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Mingliang Ji; Shiyang Jiang; Jun Zhao; Xirun Wan; Fengzhi Feng; Tong Ren; Junjun Yang; Yang Xiang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 9.075

2.  Concurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and large uterine fibroid in a nullipara - Case report.

Authors:  Ruswana Anwar; Kevin Dominique Tjandraprawira; Budi Irawan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Association between gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) history and clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.

Authors:  Xinyu Cai; Mei Zhang; Chenyang Huang; Yue Jiang; Jidong Zhou; Manlin Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Na Kong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.211

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.