BACKGROUND: COVID-19 physical distancing measures can potentially increase the likelihood of mental disorders. It is unknown whether these measures are associated with depression and anxiety. OBJECTIVES: To investigate meta-analytic global levels of depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic and how the implementation of mitigation strategies (i.e. public transportation closures, stay-at-home orders, etc.) impacted such disorders. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, BIOSIS Citation Index, Current Content Connect, PsycINFO, CINAHL, medRxiv, and PsyArXiv databases for depression and anxiety prevalences; Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker for the containment and closure policies indexes; Global Burden of Disease Study for previous levels of depression and anxiety. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Original studies conducted during COVID-19 pandemic, which assessed categorical depression and anxiety, using PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales (cutoff ⩾10). PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: General population, healthcare providers, students, and patients. National physical distancing measures. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: In total, 226 638 individuals were assessed within the 60 included studies. Global prevalence of both depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic was 24.0% and 21.3%, respectively. There were differences in the prevalence of both anxiety and depression reported across regions and countries. Asia (17.6% and 17.9%), and China (16.2% and 15.5%) especially, had the lowest prevalence of both disorders. Regarding the impact of mitigation strategies on mental health, only public transportation closures increased the prevalence of anxiety, especially in Europe. LIMITATIONS: Country-level data on physical distancing measures and previous anxiety/depression may not necessarily reflect local (i.e. city-specific) contexts. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Mental health concerns should not be viewed only as a delayed consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also as a concurrent epidemic. Our data provide support for policy-makers to consider real-time enhanced mental health services, and increase initiatives to foster positive mental health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 physical distancing measures can potentially increase the likelihood of mental disorders. It is unknown whether these measures are associated with depression and anxiety. OBJECTIVES: To investigate meta-analytic global levels of depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic and how the implementation of mitigation strategies (i.e. public transportation closures, stay-at-home orders, etc.) impacted such disorders. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, BIOSIS Citation Index, Current Content Connect, PsycINFO, CINAHL, medRxiv, and PsyArXiv databases for depression and anxiety prevalences; Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker for the containment and closure policies indexes; Global Burden of Disease Study for previous levels of depression and anxiety. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Original studies conducted during COVID-19 pandemic, which assessed categorical depression and anxiety, using PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales (cutoff ⩾10). PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: General population, healthcare providers, students, and patients. National physical distancing measures. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: In total, 226 638 individuals were assessed within the 60 included studies. Global prevalence of both depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic was 24.0% and 21.3%, respectively. There were differences in the prevalence of both anxiety and depression reported across regions and countries. Asia (17.6% and 17.9%), and China (16.2% and 15.5%) especially, had the lowest prevalence of both disorders. Regarding the impact of mitigation strategies on mental health, only public transportation closures increased the prevalence of anxiety, especially in Europe. LIMITATIONS: Country-level data on physical distancing measures and previous anxiety/depression may not necessarily reflect local (i.e. city-specific) contexts. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Mental health concerns should not be viewed only as a delayed consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also as a concurrent epidemic. Our data provide support for policy-makers to consider real-time enhanced mental health services, and increase initiatives to foster positive mental health outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anxiety; COVID-19; depression; public transport; social isolation
Authors: Sarah J Dow-Fleisner; Cherisse L Seaton; Eric Li; Katrina Plamondon; Nelly Oelke; Donna Kurtz; Charlotte Jones; Leanne M Currie; Barb Pesut; Khalad Hasan; Kathy L Rush Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Bahar Tunçgenç; Martha Newson; Justin Sulik; Yi Zhao; Guillaume Dezecache; Ophelia Deroy; Marwa El Zein Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Laila Skogstad; Inger Schou-Bredal; Tore Bonsaksen; Trond Heir; Øivind Ekeberg; Tine Grimholt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Felipe Ornell; Wyllians Vendramini Borelli; Daniela Benzano; Jaqueline Bohrer Schuch; Helena Ferreira Moura; Anne Orgler Sordi; Felix Henrique Paim Kessler; Juliana Nichterwitz Scherer; Lisia von Diemen Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2021-09-03
Authors: Abid Hassan; M D Iftekhar Ali; Rifat Ahammed; Sami Bourouis; Mohammad Monirujjaman Khan Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan; Olanrewaju Ibigbami; Maha El Tantawi; Brandon Brown; Nourhan M Aly; Oliver Ezechi; Giuliana Florencia Abeldaño; Eshrat Ara; Martin Amogre Ayanore; Passent Ellakany; Balgis Gaffar; Nuraldeen Maher Al-Khanati; Ifeoma Idigbe; Anthonia Omotola Ishabiyi; Mohammed Jafer; Abeedha Tu-Allah Khan; Zumama Khalid; Folake Barakat Lawal; Joanne Lusher; Ntombifuthi P Nzimande; Bamidele Emmanuel Osamika; Mir Faeq Ali Quadri; Mark Roque; Ala'a B Al-Tammemi; Muhammad Abrar Yousaf; Jorma I Virtanen; Roberto Ariel Abeldaño Zuñiga; Joseph Chukwudi Okeibunor; Annie Lu Nguyen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 3.390