Literature DB >> 33648588

A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework.

M Bird1, M McGillion2, E M Chambers3, J Dix4, C J Fajardo5, M Gilmour6, K Levesque2, A Lim7, S Mierdel5, C Ouellette2, A N Polanski8, S V Reaume3,9, C Whitmore2, N Carter2.   

Abstract

Background Continual improvements to health systems, products, and services are necessary for improvements in health. However, many of these improvements are not incorporated into everyday practice. When designing new health systems, products, and services, involving members of the healthcare community and the public with personal healthcare experience can help to make sure that improvements will be useful and relevant to others like them. Methods Together with healthcare workers and family members with healthcare experience, we developed and applied a step-by-step guide to involving those with personal experience in the design of health system improvements. Results Our guide has three phases- 'Pre-Design', 'Co-Design', and 'Post-Design'. This paper describes each of these phases and illustrates how we applied them to our own project, which is to use virtual healthcare methods to improve care for children with chronic healthcare conditions and their families. In our own work, we found that healthcare workers and family members with personal healthcare experiences were able to use their knowledge and creativity to help us imagine how to improve care for children with chronic healthcare conditions and their families. We have created action items from these family member- and healthcare worker-identified needs, which we will use to shape our virtual healthcare system. Conclusions This paper may be useful for those seeking to involve members of the healthcare community and the public in the creation of better healthcare systems, products, and services. Background Challenges with the adoption, scale, and spread of health innovations represent significant gaps in the evidence-to-practice cycle. In the health innovation design process, a lack of attention paid to the needs of end-users, and subsequent tailoring of innovations to meet these needs, is a possible reason for this deficit. In the creative field of health innovation, which includes the design of healthcare products, systems (governance and organization mechanisms), and services (delivery mechanisms), a framework for both soliciting the needs of end-users and translating these needs into the design of health innovations is needed. Methods To address this gap, our team developed and applied a seven-step methodological framework, called A Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation. This framework was developed by an interdisciplinary team that included patient partners. Results This manuscript contributes a framework and applied exemplar for those seeking to engage end-users in the creative process of healthcare innovation. Through the stages of 'Pre-Design', 'Co-Design', and 'Post-Design', we were able to harness the creative insights of end-users, drawing on their experiences to shape a future state of care. Using an expository example of our own work, the DigiComp Kids project, we illustrate the application of each stage of the Framework. Conclusions A Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation provides healthcare innovators, applied health science researchers, clinicians, and quality improvement specialists with a guide to eliciting and incorporating the viewpoints of end-users while distilling practical considerations for healthcare innovation and design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-design; End-user engagement; Healthcare innovation; Patient and public involvement

Year:  2021        PMID: 33648588     DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Involv Engagem        ISSN: 2056-7529


  2 in total

1.  Workplace violence in healthcare: strategies for advocacy.

Authors:  AnnMarie Papa; Jeanne Venella
Journal:  Online J Issues Nurs       Date:  2013-01-31

2.  Persona-scenario exercise for codesigning primary care interventions.

Authors:  Ruta Valaitis; Jennifer Longaphy; Kalpana Nair; Gina Agarwal; Lauren Griffith; Monika Kastner; Doug Oliver; Jenny Ploeg; Sharon Straus; Lisa Dolovich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  User Requirements for Comanaged Digital Health and Care: Review.

Authors:  Chaloner Chute; Tara French; Sneha Raman; Jay Bradley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 7.076

2.  Ethical by Design: Engaging the Community to Co-design a Digital Health Ecosystem to Improve Overdose Prevention Efforts Among Highly Vulnerable People Who Use Drugs.

Authors:  Kasey R Claborn; Suzannah Creech; Quanisha Whittfield; Ruben Parra-Cardona; Andrea Daugherty; Justin Benzer
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Play the Pain: A Digital Strategy for Play-Oriented Research and Action.

Authors:  Najmeh Khalili-Mahani; Eileen Holowka; Sandra Woods; Rilla Khaled; Mathieu Roy; Myrna Lashley; Tristan Glatard; Janis Timm-Bottos; Albert Dahan; Marieke Niesters; Richard B Hovey; Bart Simon; Laurence J Kirmayer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Development of an Evidence-Informed and Codesigned Model of Support for Children of Parents With a Mental Illness- "It Takes a Village" Approach.

Authors:  Melinda Goodyear; Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss; Annette Bauer; Hanna Christiansen; Martina Glatz-Grugger; Jean Lillian Paul
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Toward equity-oriented cancer care: a Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) protocol to promote equitable access to lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Ambreen Sayani; Jackie Manthorne; Erika Nicholson; Gary Bloch; Janet A Parsons; Stephen W Hwang; Bikila Amenu; Howard Freedman; Marlene Rathbone; Tara Jeji; Nadine Wathen; Annette J Browne; Colleen Varcoe; Aisha Lofters
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 6.  A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations.

Authors:  Tania Pearce; Myfanwy Maple; Sarah Wayland; Kathy McKay; Alan Woodward; Anna Brooks; Anthony Shakeshaft
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Process Evaluation of a Comprehensive Intervention for the Early Detection and Prevention of Oral Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Ibtisam Moafa; Mohammed Jafer; Bart Van Den Borne; Ciska Hoving
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 8.  Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Baines; Hannah Bradwell; Katie Edwards; Sebastian Stevens; Samantha Prime; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Miles Sibley; Arunangsu Chatterjee
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  A Novel Hospital-to-Home System for Children With Medical Complexities: Usability Testing Study.

Authors:  Marissa Bird; Nancy Carter; Audrey Lim; Nadia Kazmie; Cindy Fajardo; Shannon Reaume; Michael H McGillion
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-08-12

10.  COVID-19 pandemic experiences of parents caring for children with oesophageal atresia/tracheo-oesophageal fistula.

Authors:  Alexandra Stewart; Christina H Smith; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi; Jo Wray
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.