Literature DB >> 33648486

Knowledge, socio-cognitive perceptions and the practice of hand hygiene and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of UK university students.

Christine Barrett1, Kei Long Cheung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing and hand hygiene have been the primary means of reducing transmission in the absence of effective treatments or vaccines, but understanding of their determinants is limited. This study aimed to investigate knowledge and socio-cognitive perceptions, and their associations with such protective behaviours, in UK university students.
METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of 293 students was undertaken on 13 May 2020. Survey questions addressed demographics, knowledge of the disease and effectiveness of the protective measures, risk perception, socio-cognitive perceptions (e.g. attitude, social support, and self-efficacy), habit, time factors and trust, as well as the hand hygiene and social distancing behaviours. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the strongest associations of potential determinants with behaviour.
RESULTS: Participants reported high levels of social distancing with 88.9% answering "Mostly" or "Always" for every activity, but only 42.0% reporting the same for all hand hygiene activities. Knowledge of the effectiveness of each activity in preventing transmission was high, with 90.7% and 93.5% respectively identifying at least 7 of 8 hand hygiene or 9 of 10 social distancing activities correctly. Habit (β = 0.39, p = 0.001) and time factors (β = 0.28, p = 0.001) were the greatest contributors to unique variance in hand hygiene behaviour, followed by ethnicity (β = - 0.13, p = 0.014) and risk perception (β = 0.13, p = 0.016). For social distancing behaviour, the determinants were self-efficacy (β = 0.25, p < 0.001), perceived advantages (β = 0.15, p = 0.022), trust in policy (β = 0.14, p = 0.026) and gender (β = - 0.14, p = 0.016). Regression models explained 40% hand hygiene and 25% social distancing variance.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that communications about effectiveness of hand hygiene and social distancing behaviours had been effective in terms of knowledge acquisition. However, in the light of likely second waves of COVID-19, attention to maintaining social distancing behaviour and improving hand hygiene behaviour may need to address more difficult areas of changing habits, overcoming time factors and building trust, as well as interventions to increase self-efficacy and address risk perception concerns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 pandemic; Determinants; Hand hygiene; Health behaviours; I-change; Social distancing; University students

Year:  2021        PMID: 33648486     DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10461-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  28 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral reactions to H1N1 during a later stage of the epidemic.

Authors:  Ummügülsüm Gaygisiz; Esma Gaygisiz; Türker Ozkan; Timo Lajunen
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK.

Authors:  G J Rubin; H W W Potts; S Michie
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Comparative age distribution of influenza morbidity and mortality during seasonal influenza epidemics and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Authors:  Magali Lemaitre; Fabrice Carrat
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Examining the knowledge, attitudes and practices of domestic and international university students towards seasonal and pandemic influenza.

Authors:  Holly Seale; Jackie P I Mak; Husna Razee; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Loose Ends in the Epidemiology of the 1918 Pandemic: Explaining the Extreme Mortality Risk in Young Adults.

Authors:  Maarten van Wijhe; Mathias Mølbak Ingholt; Viggo Andreasen; Lone Simonsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during early phase of the H1N1 influenza epidemic.

Authors:  Joseph T F Lau; Sian Griffiths; Kai-Chow Choi; Chunqing Lin
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  The Determinants of Reported Personal and Household Hygiene Behaviour: A Multi-Country Study.

Authors:  Robert Aunger; Katie Greenland; George Ploubidis; Wolf Schmidt; John Oxford; Valerie Curtis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review.

Authors:  Alison Bish; Susan Michie
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-01-28

9.  Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19.

Authors:  Cornelia Betsch; Lothar H Wieler; Katrine Habersaat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Host susceptibility to severe COVID-19 and establishment of a host risk score: findings of 487 cases outside Wuhan.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Xia Yu; Hong Zhao; Hao Wang; Ruihong Zhao; Jifang Sheng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  14 in total

1.  A survey of hand hygiene practices among Indian medical undergraduates.

Authors:  Mangesh Kritya; Arun Kumar Yadav; Gopalakrishnan Shridhar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-10-19

2.  Patterns of social mixing in England changed in line with restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020 to April 2022).

Authors:  Louise E Smith; Henry W W Potts; Richard Amlȏt; Nicola T Fear; Susan Michie; G James Rubin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Electrostatic Spray Disinfection Using Nano-Engineered Solution on Frequently Touched Surfaces in Indoor and Outdoor Environments.

Authors:  Tanya Purwar; Shamya Dey; Osama Zaid Ali Al-Kayyali; Aaron Floyd Zalar; Ali Doosttalab; Luciano Castillo; Victor M Castano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Association of Social-Cognitive Factors with Individual Preventive Behaviors of COVID-19 among a Mixed-Sample of Older Adults from China and Germany.

Authors:  Yanping Duan; Sonia Lippke; Wei Liang; Borui Shang; Franziska Maria Keller; Petra Wagner; Julien Steven Baker; Jiali He
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Legal restrictions and mitigation strategies amongst a disabled population during COVID-19.

Authors:  Tarandeep S Kang; Robin Goodwin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Analyzing Risk Communication, Trust, Risk Perception, Negative Emotions, and Behavioral Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China Using a Structural Equation Model.

Authors:  Junwang Gu; Rong He; Xuanhui Wu; Jing Tao; Wenhui Ye; Chunmei Wu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30

7.  Determining Perceived Self-Efficacy for Preventing Dengue Fever in Two Climatically Diverse Mexican States: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Esther Annan; Aracely Angulo-Molina; Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob; Nolan Kline; Uriel A Lopez-Lemus; Ubydul Haque
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

8.  Understanding the influence of contextual factors and individual social capital on American public mask wearing in response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Feng Hao; Wanyun Shao; Weiwei Huang
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.931

9.  Predicting hand washing, mask wearing and social distancing behaviors among older adults during the covid-19 pandemic: an integrated social cognition model.

Authors:  Yanping Duan; Borui Shang; Wei Liang; Zhihua Lin; Chun Hu; Julien Steven Baker; Yanping Wang; Jiali He
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Testing persuasive messaging to encourage COVID-19 risk reduction.

Authors:  Scott E Bokemper; Gregory A Huber; Erin K James; Alan S Gerber; Saad B Omer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.